Dear All,
Thanks for all your replied but still I don't know how to install from 1.0.7
to 1.2.14. What should I consider to keep the same configuration during or after
upgrade?
It is the first time I am trying to upgrade my Dovecot.
Thank a lot for your help
--- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at
dovecot.org> wrote:
From: dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org>
Subject: dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Date: Friday, 1 October, 2010, 15:25
Send dovecot mailing list submissions to
??? dovecot at dovecot.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
??? http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
??? dovecot-request at dovecot.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
??? dovecot-owner at dovecot.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dovecot digest..."
Today's Topics:
???1. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Noel Butler)
???2. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (Noel Butler)
???3. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry)
???4. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Jerry)
???5. Re: how to upgrade dovecot (fakessh)
???6. Re: Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ?? (Stan Hoeppner)
???7. v1 ok, v2 not (Alberto)
???8. Re: Possible bug with proxy in 2.0.4 (Ed W)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000
From: Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ??
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <1285936645.21841.19.camel at tardis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:20 +0200, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> All true, but there is a current 1.2.14 out there which should probably
> be preferred ove a two-and-a-half year old 1.0.15.
> Jakob
>
Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of
using source packages and will insist on using a? several yo version
because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides,? the 1.2 branch
is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only oifferes 1.0.x,
well, that says a? lot about distro X/Y, we all know who X 'n Y are,
without mentioning names :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-smile.png
Type: image/png
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/d1d05ea2/attachment-0001.png
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:40:41 +1000
From: Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] how to upgrade dovecot
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <1285936841.21841.23.camel at tardis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:32 +0100, arif khwaja wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest
version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it please.
>
>
use the source, luke :)???from the website
I suggest using 1.2.14, expect a couple teething problems depending on your
setup for the 1.0 to 1.2
changes in the config, but as to how you need it built, depends on how you are
using it now.
.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-smile.png
Type: image/png
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/19bf35d4/attachment-0001.png
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:53:58 -0400
From: Jerry <dovecot.user at seibercom.net>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ??
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <20101001085358.6c8c3922 at scorpio>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:32:39 +1000
Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> articulated:
> really? wow how things must have changed in recent years, they used to
> be so, well, debian like, but not quite as bad :)
Touch?. The FreeBSD developers do have a bug up their ass regarding GPL
licenses which has effectively slowed down the introduction of some new
(better) software into the base system. This has reportedly led to
sporadic problems with some newer applications being released into the
FreeBSD ports system.
All things considered though, they usually maintain software that is
relatively up-to-date; i.e., Postfix for example. The developers version
is always available and current in the ports system. Most other major
applications follow that general protocol. New releases of Dovecot are
always available, usually only a few days after being released. This
2.x version is not the norm though. It is, as you so clearly stated, a
BETA version. I would like to see FreeBSED release it clearly marked as
a BETA or DEVELOPERS version, aka "USE AT ON RISK". Doing so would
allow it to receive more extensive testing while warning potential
users of the risks involved.
I would comment on Debian; however, I don't want to start a flame war.
--
Jerry ?
Dovecot.user at seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:59:03 -0400
From: Jerry <dovecot.user at seibercom.net>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ??
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <20101001085903.71a54c37 at scorpio>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000
Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> articulated:
> Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of
> using source packages and will insist on using a? several yo version
> because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides,? the 1.2
> branch is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only
> oifferes 1.0.x, well, that says a? lot about distro X/Y, we all know
> who X 'n Y are, without mentioning names :)
Seriously, the weekend is upon use. Nothing like a good flame war over
whose OS is superior.
--
Jerry ?
Dovecot.user at seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:11:02 +0200
From: fakessh <fakessh at fakessh.eu>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] how to upgrade dovecot
To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
Message-ID: <201010011511.08456.fakessh at fakessh.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Le vendredi 1 octobre 2010 14:40, Noel Butler a ?crit?:> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:32 +0100, arif khwaja wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest
> > version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it
> > please.
>
> use the source, luke :)???from the website
>
> I suggest using 1.2.14, expect a couple teething problems depending on your
> setup for the 1.0 to 1.2 changes in the config, but as to how you need it
> built, depends on how you are using it now.
>
> .
I describe the procedure for migrating from 1.2.13 to 2.0.0 on my blog
i quote dovecot -n for 1.2.11 and i quote dovecot -n for 2.0.0
http://fakessh.eu/?p=150
http://fakessh.eu/
sign my blog if you desire
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20101001/8ab7ec2c/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:35:54 -0500
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan at hardwarefreak.com>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v0.99.13-3 upgrade to 1.0.15-2 ??
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <4CA5E3BA.5050809 at hardwarefreak.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Jerry put forth on 10/1/2010 7:59 AM:> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:37:25 +1000
> Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> articulated:
>
>> Indeed, but some people who use certain distros are scared shitless of
>> using source packages and will insist on using a? several yo version
>> because thats all <insert distro X or Y here> provides,? the 1.2
>> branch is rock solid stable and time proven, if distro X/Y only
>> oifferes 1.0.x, well, that says a? lot about distro X/Y, we all know
>> who X 'n Y are, without mentioning names :)
>
> Seriously, the weekend is upon use. Nothing like a good flame war over
> whose OS is superior.
I've never understood the OS flame war mentality.? Each OS has its
strengths and its weaknesses.? You pick your OS poison based on the
strengths you desire, and live with the warts.? Every OS has warts, some
more than others, but they all have 'em.
--
Stan
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:09:35 +0200
From: Alberto <alberto.fhd at gmail.com>
Subject: [Dovecot] v1 ok, v2 not
To: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID:
??? <AANLkTim0mxqoyicSBUxgTrCNbnDPWxgPpC5nWFOONDb5 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
hello everybody!
This's my very first post in dovecot. I'm installing a new server for
backup
site, with qmail + vpopmail 5.4.32 + dovecot.
Production server, more or less outdated, runs with Couier Imap, but
everybody know the history..
I've been fighting for several days...And no luck with version 2.0.4, 2.0.3
neither.
My first asumption was to review things thousand of times due to newbie
condition...
This morning I've tried version 1.2.14 and voila! , it works perfectly!
The error log with version 2 was the famous unkown user one:
dovecot: auth: vpopmail(test4 at adomain.com,10.206.16.10): unknown user
test4 user worked perfectly with pop3...
Just FYI, is this can help.
Regards!
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:25:22 +0100
From: Ed W <lists at wildgooses.com>
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Possible bug with proxy in 2.0.4
To: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>
Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org
Message-ID: <4CA5EF52.5040503 at wildgooses.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
? On 30/09/2010 18:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 08:08 +0100, Ed W wrote:
>>> CRAM-MD5 doesn't work directly with proxying. It can't
work, by CRAM-MD5 design. The only way to make it work is if your passdb lookup
returns a password, either the user's actual password in plaintext or some
master password, that the backends accepts with plaintext authentication.
>> I'm not quite sure I understand the nuances of that?
>>
>> Yes I do have a passdb (on the remote machine) which returns a plain
>> password.? Actually since it's DB driven I have already returned
all the
>> information needed to auth the user on the proxying machine
>>
>> The password query is the same on both sides and it looks like:
>>
>> password_query = SELECT NULLIF(mail_host, '%l') as proxy,
>> NULLIF(mail_host, '%l') as host, \
>>? ? ???email as user, password, \
> Add: ..., password, password as pass, ..
>
>
Aha - this is the master login stuff.? That does kind of make sense.?
Quite subtle mind
Thanks for replying
Ed W
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dovecot mailing list
dovecot at dovecot.org
http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot
End of dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3
**************************************
