similar to: PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme"

2017 Aug 11
0
PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme
Dear Dennis, Your question assumes that people know both SAS PROC MIXED and R nlme. Only a limited number of people do. Add the mathematical formulation of the model. That will increase the number of people that can help you. Adding the number of levels in each categorical variable and the number of observation per group is useful too. Best regards, ir. Thierry Onkelinx Instituut voor natuur-
2017 Aug 11
2
PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme
Hi Robert: Thanks for your response, as well. I'm sorry. As you've discovered, I made some capitalization errors when posting my R code. The actual R code does use "lme", "data", and "random". The dataframe is indeed named "emiss" and each item in the formula is a column in the dataframe. I used the following R code to read in the
2017 Aug 11
0
PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme
On 8/10/2017 8:34 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum wrote: > -- snip -- I don't have real help, but I'll remind you that R is case sensitive, and it looks like that will be at least one problem in the solution your are working on below: lme not LME data not DATA random = RANDOM > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The R code I've devised for the
2017 Aug 11
0
PROC MIXED RANDOM equivalence in R nlme
> On Aug 11, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Dennis F. Kahlbaum <kbomb at umich.edu> wrote: > > Hi Robert: > > Thanks for your response, as well. > > I'm sorry. As you've discovered, I made some capitalization errors when posting my R code. The actual R code does use "lme", "data", and "random". > > The dataframe is indeed named
2005 Jun 27
2
simplifying the code
dear list: I need help to achieve a simpler code to complete a task I'm performing. here is an example: dat<-expand.grid(a=seq(1,5),b=seq(1000,1005)) I want to add a new column dat$c in that: t1<-ifelse(dat$a==1&dat$b==1001,1001,0) t2<-ifelse(dat$a==2&dat$b==1002,1001,0) t3<-ifelse(dat$a==3&dat$b==1003,1001,0) t4<-ifelse(dat$a==1&dat$b==1002,1002,0)
2009 Mar 18
1
Reading a file line by line - separating lines VS separating columns
Hello all. I wish to read a large data set into R. My current issue is in getting the data so that R would be able to access it. Using read.table won't work since the data is over 1GB in size (and I am using windows XP), so my plan was to read the file chunk by chunk and each time move it into bigmemory (I'll play with that when the time will come, maybe ff is better ?!). I encountered
2010 Jan 12
1
parsing protocol of states
Dear R-users, actually i try to parse some state protocols for my work. i an easy stetting the code below works fine, if states are reached only once. in harder settings it could be possible that one state gets visited more times. in this case for me its interesting to see how much waiting time lies between to states on the whole. by the way i didn't use R as a parsing tool so far, so
2012 Aug 29
4
Sorting of columns of a matrix
Dear all, Please suggest me how can I do it. I have a matrix which look like following: x1 x2 x3 t1 .01 0.3 0 t2 0 0.1 0.01 t3 0 .01 .01 t4 0 0 t5 5 0 0 t6 0 0 0 t7 0 0 0 t8 0 0 0 t9 0.6 0 0 t10 0 0 0.66 t11 0 0.6 0.11 t12 0 0.4 0 I want to sort decreasing order in each column based on rows. and then to display only those rows which has a value. The expected out put matrix will
2010 Mar 10
1
PCA
Hello, I am trying to complete a PCA on a set of standardized ring widths from 8 different sites (T10, T9, T8, T7, T6, T5, T3, and T2). The following is a small portion of my data: T10 T9 T8 T7 T6 T5 T3 T2 1.33738 0.92669 0.91146 0.98922 0.9308 0.88201 0.92287 0.91775 0.82181 1.05319 0.92908 0.97971 0.95165 0.98029 1.14048 0.77803 0.88294 0.96413 0.90893 0.87957 0.9961 0.74926 0.71394 0.70877
2017 Jul 07
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ? http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector describes how to define a store instruction. -Eli On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote: > Please correct me i m stuck at this point. > > On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"
2011 Aug 13
1
Own R function doubt
Hi to all the people again, I was writting a simply function in R, and wish to collect the results in a excel file. The work goes as follows, Ciervos<-function(K1, K0, A, R,M,Pi,Hembras) {B<-(K1-K0)/A T1<-(R*Pi*Hembras-M*Pi+B)/(Pi-M*Pi+R*Pi*Hembras) P1<-Pi-B R1<-P1*Hembras*R M1<-P1*M T2<-(R1-M1+B)/(P1-M1+R1) P2<-P1-B R2<-P2*Hembras*R M2<-P2*M
2012 Nov 18
1
Best prediction to use to use for basic problem?
I have a rather basic set of data. It is simply a variable that can be 0, 1 or 2 and its value over a series of time t0 - t9 like so: y: 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 1 x: t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 I need to predict what the value of y will be at t10 through t13. As you can see its rather basic. I am rather new to solving these types of problems so I am looking for some good straight forward things
2018 Mar 09
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
Hi, I have a problem that dbg_value nodes are not transferred when integer DAG nodes are promoted. For example, an i32 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion,
2018 Mar 13
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
Thanks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my
2024 Jan 14
1
Fwd: Strange results : bootrstrp CIs
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:59:16 -0500 Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> > My guess is that one of the bootstrap samples had a different > selection of countries, so factor(Country) had different levels, and > that would really mess things up. > > You'll need to decide how to handle that: If you are trying to > estimate the coefficient for
2018 Mar 09
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
+ Adrian, Joshua + Jonas, since he contributed the transferDbgValues change in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger > On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Se Jong Oh via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a problem that dbg_value nodes are not transferred when integer DAG nodes are promoted. For example, an i32 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by
2024 Jan 14
1
Fwd: Strange results : bootrstrp CIs
On 13/01/2024 8:58 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:59:16 -0500 > Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >> My guess is that one of the bootstrap samples had a different >> selection of countries, so factor(Country) had different levels, and >> that would really mess things up. >> >> You'll
2005 Aug 17
1
resampling Question
hi, sorry for a possibly naive question but I am a bit of a beginner in R programming... I wrote a function which simulates some data and performs two different kinds of analyses on it. as an output I get the statistics for the two analyses (t-values). Now I would like to have an other function which reruns my first function say a 1000 times and attaches the resulting statistics in a data.frame
2018 Mar 14
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
Hi Jonas, Thanks for taking a look! It makes linear-dbg-value.ll pass for my target by producing DEBUG_VALUEs correctly. I also tried a simple function with few operations and confirmed DEBUG_VALUEs which are not produced without trasferDbgValues in SetPromotedInteger. Thanks, Sejong From: jdevlieghere at apple.com <jdevlieghere at apple.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 4:07 AM To: Se
2016 Dec 14
2
Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.4
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:22:41PM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:12:21PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, The Doctor wrote: > > > > > Got you. Will run make tests. So far running on > > > FreeBSD 11.0 using openssl 1.0.2 current > > > > Thanks! > > Point of concern > > run test sftp-perm.sh