similar to: doveadm: Fatal: open(/dev/tty)

Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating the jail with `ezjail-admin update -i` I created a 'ports build' jail `ezjail-admin

Hello, I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with quotas on those filesystems, etc) I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs action? If not, I'll start ignoring them. Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]: [2024/11/11 19:00:45.852391, 0] ../../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log) Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]:

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with > quotas on those filesystems, etc) > > I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs > action? If not, I'll start ignoring them. > > Nov 11 19:00:45 tm samba-dcerpcd[7373]: [2024/11/11

On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with >> quotas on those filesystems, etc) >> >> I'm seeing these entries in my logs. Is this something which needs >> action? If not, I'll start

I'm planning to deploy a personal dovecot IMAP server (i.e. I am the only user) in a FreeBSD jail. At present, I have IMAP deployed on the same host as one of my mail servers, which is running Postfix. I do like Postfix, but it seems to be a bit overkill for this particular situation. All my incoming MX are provided by Google. They handle the incoming mail and forward to my private MX,

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Thu Apr 16 2015 21:31:30 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > On 16 Apr 2015, at 04:45, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com>

Hi, I've got a problem with booting zfs-on-root FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE. I'm getting: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool klawisz gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool klawisz Machine is VM running under KVM on Proxmox 2.3-13. VM has 8 GB of RAM, 400 GB of local storage with SCSI Controller type: Default (lsi). I'm not sure what I did to

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Bartosz wrote: > Dear All, > > Could you please recommend me a UPS with 100% support of the ondelay parameter and NUT compatibility? > > 850 or 1000 VA > > I have the EATON 5E850iUSBDIN UPS and it does not support this parameter so I would like to buy another UPS that for sure will support it. > > Thank you, > Bart Can you tell

I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki entry yesterday. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL The entry: submission inet n - - - - smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, at 7:35 PM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > I just started shopping for my replacements: > >> I like batteries from RaionGroup.com or batterywholesale.com. > > Here is some free coincidental trivia. > > I was a sysadmin for the server behind batterywholesale.com for about > 10

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > On 19/11/24 02:27, Dan Langille via samba wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Dan Langille via samba wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm using samba416-4.16.11 on FreeBSD 14.1 (on ZFS, in a jail, with >>> quotas on those filesystems, etc) >>> >>> I'm seeing these

On 11/18/2024 6:18 PM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, at 7:35 PM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >> I just started shopping for my replacements: >> >>> I like batteries from RaionGroup.com or batterywholesale.com. >> >> Here is some free coincidental

Hello, I had an idea last week: why shut everything off (in my basement) when the power goes off (and run time goes below X minutes)? My idea: shutdown the big stuff first (two servers) leaving the little stuff (switches, wireless, gateway) running for a while longer. I might get another 30 minutes of internet that way. Let me watch a bit more streaming?. I?m convinced that idea is achievable

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote: I just started shopping for my replacements: > I like batteries from RaionGroup.com or batterywholesale.com. Here is some free coincidental trivia. I was a sysadmin for the server behind batterywholesale.com for about 10 years. It was part time work. The couple behind the company have since sold the business and retired. I'm still

On 21/11/24 14:11, Dan Langille wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote: >> On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> Hope that helps. >> >> Not much unfortunately. >> >> Running this: >> >> net cache list >> >> will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with >> real

This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

Interesting. Something similar came up in late May. Look for "[Nut-upsuser] Synthesize low batt (LB) fron SNMP UPS which does not support this?? Is there an archive of this list? I an?t find it. I?d been trying to figure out how to do that itself, but then found some code in drivers/dstate.c that looked like it would work, but someone else replied that they?d tried it and it didn?t work. But

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > On 20/11/24 11:55, Dan Langille wrote: > >> Hope that helps. > > Not much unfortunately. > > Running this: > > net cache list > > will tell you what the cache thinks it contains. If it is filled with > real things, it could indicate where they're coming from. If it fails or > shows a cache

I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains nothing of value. # zpool status pool: storage state: ONLINE status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.

With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems: