similar to: nesting htbs

I''m not an expert, but I can tell you that when traffic shaping on a router, you can just shape egress both ways and not mess with imq. My script is at http://www.stardotstar.org/?page_id=63 The basis are the following 2 lines where UPDEV is ppp0 and DOWNDEV is eth0 in your case. tc qdisc add dev ${UPDEV} root handle 1: htb default 100 r2q 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DOWNDEV} root handle 1:

ive got problems with my network (120 people) ive got big pings (300ms)m whereas there are normally about 19ms. i do not know if my qos is proper (fast i mean). www.tdi.pozman.pl/fir2 - my qos www.tdi.pozman.pl/rules - my firewall can sb tell me if do it ok ? -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl |

how can i get rid of that ?? i do del roots before scripting. -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl | *Serwery,administracja,webapps - www.ProAdmin.com.pl | *Fingerprint:43E21CC46DAFD2F754E91547D59B39F56AAA4B5F

ok i gave up. can sb point me docs on how design proper qos rules ? about differences between them and the usage (which for wifi, which for ISPs which for homenet) ill read and do it -- *Dariusz ''tdi'' Dwornikowski | Gentoo | admin at pozman.pl | *[JID]:tdi@gentoo.pl|[gg]:2266034|[IRC]:#gentoo-pl@freenode | *[MAIL]:tdi@pozman.pl|[WWW]:www.tdi.pozman.pl |

Hi all, This is probably not the right place for this question, but maybe someone can help me out. I am trying to setup a VPN between two private addresses, using iproute2 (which is my only excuse for mailing this list). The setup is as below : eth0 ppp0 Wireless ppp0 eth0

Hi, I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards, connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse direction. The forwarding node is

Hi fellows, i''m just a newbie to use the cool tc and played around the last 2 weeks. I''m quite confident - in theory - what''s possible and the basic difference between the queuing disciplines. We''re using a Fedora Core 3 box as Gateway (iptables,tc,iproute2 with NAT). Clients are coming in via eth1 and outgouing traffic (2Mbit/s SDSL) through eth0. So we

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --

I''ve been having a bit of difficulty with a hierarchy of HTBs that I''m wanting to create. Essentially, I''ve got one interface that goes to both the DMZ and the internet. When going to the internet, some of the traffic will be going through a VPN and therefore I want to prioritize it differently, however I want to give the DMZ traffic full speed as long as it

Hi, I have a buster system configured as a DC running 4.11.13 from Louis's repo. I am trying to get https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 working. Mostly it seems to work but there seems to be a problem with what dhcpd writes into the leases file in the "on release" stanza. When dhcpd writes the On Release stanza I get something like the

El 24/06/15 a les 17:02, James ha escrit: > On 6/24/2015 10:13 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 24/06/15 14:17, Luca Olivetti wrote: >>> El 24/06/15 a les 14:30, James ha escrit: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Is it possible to use isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba internal DNS? I >>>> would rather not use bind as I understand you can't

El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> > It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have similar > records in AD and they replicate. Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. Never happened until September 25 (though I realized only today when a manually added host resolved erratically). > > Can you post

Hi, more than a month ago I proposed an addition to the HOWTO to address a certain packet classification problem/bug and how to fix it (see http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016728.html). I never received any reaction from the HOWTO maintainers, not even when addressing them directly (see mail below). Given that a month has gone by: Is the HOWTO currently unmaintained? Regards,

Hai, ? A bit off topic in the samba forum, but i thinks this is the best place to ask. ? Im having?some troubles to get the dhcp server fully working with samba4. I dont think this is a samba problem, but as i did say here maybe the best placy to ask.. ? It works, but not totaly. The strange thing is for example. ? My debian client is now working.? It adds and deletes as it should.? No

If I don't use DHCP failover, can you tell me how to do to to have manually dhcp start method working... I think I could made a mistake, this is what i did : ( I using Louis script from "old set of script" directory : https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ ) - On server S4 : resolv.conf set to S4 first and S4bis in second - On server S4 : in dhcp-dyndns-debian.sh,

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:43 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) >Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> >> As to the current issue, I am attemting to configure DHCP to update >> DNS records with BIND9, as outlined in the Samba Wiki (with >>

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > What are the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private/dns ? Also don't forget the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private If you're using sernet's packages, you'll have to chgrp it to to named or give it o+x perms.

Yes I think so This is my /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style interim; #ddns-update-style none; update-static-leases on; option domain-name-servers cd1.home.cu; option domain-name "home.cu"; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; include "/etc/bind/rndc.key"; #include "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; # deny

Hello everyone, I have configured my Samba as AD with BIND9_DLZ as backend and trying to configure the ISC-DHCP-server to add the leases to BIND_DLZ As described in the samba wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_B IND9 Everything is working fine so far, but I get an error message as shown below in syslog: Aug 13 14:32:28 SAMBA dhcpd[4635]: