thanks for your reply, but the reason for imq on my setup would be to
shape incoming traffic with dst_ip=router_ip AND the traffic that gets
routed to the nat''ed boxes.
eg.
router 40% ceil 100%
lan 60% ceil 100%
i''m not 100% sure on this but without imq that would be only ingress
''dropping'' i could do, right? and i couldnt split the traffic
nicely as
my example shows.
of course this is just my understanding of how tc works using a linux
kernel. if i''m wrong or missed some solution that''s
nicer/easier i''m all
ears ;)
oh and thanks for your script. nicely done
regards
Edward Smith wrote:> I''m not an expert, but I can tell you that when traffic shaping on
a
> router, you can just shape egress both ways and not mess with imq. My
> script is at
>
> http://www.stardotstar.org/?page_id=63
>
> The basis are the following 2 lines where UPDEV is ppp0 and DOWNDEV is
> eth0 in your case.
>
> tc qdisc add dev ${UPDEV} root handle 1: htb default 100 r2q 1
> tc qdisc add dev ${DOWNDEV} root handle 1: htb default 100 r2q 1
>
> Edward
>
>
>
>>Message: 2
>>Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:40:11 +0200
>>From: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com>
>
>
>>seems like imq is the only solution to me. my idea on imq0 was something
>>like this:
>
>