similar to: psad Error

Hi, I''d like to use psad from www.cipherdyne.com that analyze iptables log messages on my firewall-shorewall. It complains to incorrectly configured iptables when starting. This is the message : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The INPUT chain in the iptables ruleset on debian4 includes a default LOG rule for all

Hello, I was looking at the following test case which is very relevant in imaging applications. int sad(unsigned char *pix1, unsigned char *pix2) { int sum = 0; for( int x = 0; x < 16; x++ ) { sum += abs( pix1[x] - pix2[x] ); } return sum; } The llvm IR generated after all the IR

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:10, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:59, Tom Eastep wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:52, Petr Novák wrote: > > > > > > > Is there a way for shorewall to be comatible with psad ? > > > > > > >From the above messages, it doesn''t seem likely. > > > > > > >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3539 Bug ID: 3539 Summary: sshbuf memory leak in recv_rexec_state() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Vijender, > > Thanks for posting this, there is wide support here for improving our support for reductions of various kinds, both in flavor and robustness. I've cc'd some others who have previously discussed this. > > James has advocated in the past for an intrinsic for horizontal reductions,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=505 ------- Additional Comments From mbr@cipherdyne.org 2007-03-24 06:01 MET ------- I've tested the proposed patch against the iptables-1.3.7 source, and find that it works in the reported broken case: # iptables -A INPUT -m string --algo kmp --string 111\"222 -j LOG # ./iptables-save > ipt.out # ./iptables-restore

as subject

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3540 Bug ID: 3540 Summary: fix minor memory leak for kex_names_cat() returned string Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh

On 4 May 2015 at 08:37, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad <Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > My worry is regarding the query for cost calculation for specific SAD > instructions such as ‘psad’ (X86) or ‘usad’ (ARM) in Loop Vectorizer. Hi Shahid, The vectorizer's cost model has the ability to return different costs for the same instruction based on the arguments (scalar/vector,

Hi Renato, Thanks for your response. My concern was actually this. For example, take vector type V8i16 on X86 target With llvm.sad() intrinsic: VC1 (Vector Cost) = Cost associated with "PSAD" instruction. W/ llvm.absd() and llvm.hadd() VC2 = Cost associated with "absolute diff" + "horizontal add" ( ??? ) As I will be querying with getIntrinsicCost(ID) for these

This may not necessarily be the best place to ask this, but I''ve tried the Admin Guide, LinuxQuestions and Debian forums and no one knows. Running Debian Testing, and I need to set up two profiles for my wifi adapter, one for home and one for any open AP. I''m using the manual method of configuring, editing the /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf and /etc/network/interfaces

Hi Shahid. Do you mind providing a concrete example of X86 code where an intrinsic was added (preferrable with filenames and line numbers)? I'm having difficulty tracking down the steps you provided. Any help is appreciated. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > > > We had done this for generation

Hi Rail, Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which Detect SAD patterns and emit psadbw instructions on X86.: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14840 http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897 Intrinsics related to absdiff revisons : http://reviews.llvm.org/D10867 http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678 Hope this helps. Regards, Suyog On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

* I sent this to the guy doing the Securing RH 5.x online book, but this is not RedHat specific, should be good for all Linux'es (?). I haven't seen anything on here about this, so my apologies if maybe I missed it. >Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:37:27 -0400 >From: Alan Spicer <aspicer@ebiznet.com> >Organization: Electronic Business Network >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en]

On 18/11/13 21:43, Brandon Holt wrote: > I am working on a pass to extract small regions of code to run > somewhere else (different node in a cluster). Basically what I need is > the ability to isolate a region of code, get its inputs and outputs, > create a new function with the extracted code and code aggregating the > in and out parameters as structs that can be cast for a

Suyog, Thanks for the reply. Do you know if it is possible to add a new intrinsic without actually modifying core code (ISDOpcodes.h is an example of core code)? I'd like to add this intrinsic with as little code change as possible. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:59 PM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which

I know someone who for the past 4 days has been having the heck ddosed out of him. He runs a gaming server, and ran a report on the ddos; he has 8 pages of that and a few hours ago there were 16 pages. They''re attacking his machine on random ports and he blocks UDP traffic on those ports, but they keep attacking on other ports. So far he''s banned over 800,000 IP''s.

Hi Asghar-Ahmed, I saw your last ping - sorry, I'm away on vacation and back on Wednesday. Generally, I'm not sure that having both absd/hadd and sad are compatible with the discussions going on in other threads, for example my thread about min and max. Given that those two intrinsics are fairly trivial to match , I don't see the need to have two different canonical forms. James On

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I changed all rules to drop (Even the one in shorewall.conf) .. And PSAD works great with Shorewall here ... Although that might not be what you want. Lady Linux At 10:43 AM 9/19/2003, you wrote: >Is there a way for shorewall to be comatible with psad ? >thanks & regards >Petr Novak "No Problems Only Solutions"

For what it's worth to those who want to play with SPA, here is a demo i whipped up. It is very easy to set up, and i almost guarantee anyone can get this running. What we will demonstrate: Bascially: An SPA demo. Requirements: Very little - a minimal setup of centos. This setup will demonstrate a client who initially cannot connect to a an ssh port on the server (the server is DROPing