similar to: Building btrfs as a dkms module on Debian

Hi, Unfortunately, I did not succeed to compile a btrfs module via dkms from btrfs-unstable (commit 9aeead73782c4b8e2a91def36dbf95db28605c95) for kernel version 2.6.34-git16. For the exact error message, please see the make.log attached. If I replace the symlink to btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs by a sumlink to the corresponding subdirectory of the kernel tree everything works well. Thanks, Andreas

Hi all, I''d like to look into btrfs code and try some things, so I followed the instructions on the wiki (link below) to setup git and get a dkms build against my kernel. I''m using Ubuntu 10.10 with a 2.6.35 Kernel, which I assume is too old. What version do I need? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories I''ve followed the guide (skipped

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> * Package name : blktap-dkms Version : 2.0.90 Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> * URL : http://www.xen.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package This package

Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by

My OQO boxes have the AR5413 wifi chipset, so for the first time in quite a while, I again need to run madwifi. So I went looking for the dkms madwifi rpms, but could not find them. They use to be on rpmforge, as I recall. dkms is there. So have I lost some memory cells or have these rpms taken a hike?

I've just built the nvidia driver for my home machine for the third time and I'd like to put it into a dkms format, but I'm not entirely clear on what goes where to make this work. I googled for a good primer on dkms, but what I'm finding is essentially equivalent to the man page, which, like most Unix/Linux man pages, doesn't really tell you "how to do this from

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for

tags 742515 + patch tags 742515 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for blktap-dkms (versioned as 2.0.93-0.2) and uploaded it directly to the archive as discussed on IRC. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blktap-dkms-2.0.93-0.2-nmu.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 2499 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop (latitude-e4500) for an employee. I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - enclosed are the errors messages. The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS. The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The build fails on 3.14 kernel with the following error: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c: In function ?blktap_ring_make_tr_request?: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:314:32: error: ?struct bio? has no member named ?bi_sector?

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: apw at ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu xenial ubuntu-patch Mainline 4.4 switches how we detect atomicity. Follow that change when compiling against 4.4 based kernels. We are using this in Ubuntu with our latest kernels. Thanks for considering the patch. -apw -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid

First, I want to thank Karanbir for the centos extras repo. I have a question about dkms. I have several Dell PowerEdge systems with Centos 4, and kbs-CentOS- Extras and dell-software repos enabled. Is there any possible conflict if I allow yum to update dkms from dell-software instead of kbs-CentOS-Extras? Currently the i386 architecture has version 2.0.11- in dell-software and 2.0.10-1

Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver? mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not by the "generic" xorg x11 nvidia driver

Alan, I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference. [1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot with them. That's the question I get asked a lot of times from around my home area. In turn when these users that are new to Linux they get discouraged when they can't

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-2 X-Debbugs-CC: wzssyqa at gmail.com This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system, which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib, while is not the default architecture, mips* for example. On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32 libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64. Beside the way, on

Hey folks, I'd like to get a .deb of the unmodified_drivers put together. I just filed ITP, and I would love to have your help with it. http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=653 I've never built a kernel package before, nor have I used DKMS, so it's going to be a bumpy ride for me. Do any of you have experience with these tools? Have you built the unmodified_drivers modules recently?

blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-07 It is affected by these RC bugs: 742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build

blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-28 It is affected by these RC bugs: 742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build