similar to: package provider for FreeBSD

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "package provider for FreeBSD"

2012 Sep 04
1
Does certification make sense for non-PE users?
Subject really says it all. I took the practice exam linked from @PuppetLabs and I was a little bit surprised/caught-off-guard by the number of either PE or Console questions, neither of which I''ve ever used :-! I am taking the developer exam though, so I''m sure that will be at least a little different. Does it make sense to take the exam for an "open source puppet
2007 Apr 09
11
Issues with Puppet on FreeBSD / Creating a Recipe
Hi, I am running an environment with 15 FreeBSD servers on which I want to maintain ports, rc.conf settings, and assorted configuration in /usr/local/etc/. Looked around the existing Puppet docs, I got a puppetmaster and a test client to work and install a package as specified in the site manifest. This is very basic but awesome! I want to create a puppet FreeBSD HowTo that addresses a
2007 Aug 12
4
freebsd ports provider
I''d like to clarify some points about the ports/package system in FreeBSD. I apoligize ahead of time if this is Both packages and ports use the pkgdb system. This isn''t some lame cludge; it''s by design, and the reason is really quite simple. Packages are built from the ports collection. The only real difference between them is the mode of delivery. When you run
2007 Sep 06
1
freebsd and latest non-devel port installations
hi, i''ve run into somewhat of a snag with my puppet instances: when i try to have puppet install a port via portupgrade, it seems to step up each version in ports to the latest, if there are multiple versions. i''ve run into this with two ports so far: vim and postfix. my package line is: package { postfix: ensure => latest } i am however able to specify the version
2008 Feb 28
14
Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says Updating Existing Systems > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update > an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on > the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent > sets
2013 Jul 03
1
curl and CVE-2013-2174
Dear members, It may sound a silly question. I have curl installed: # pkg_info |grep curl curl-7.24.0_3 Non-interactive tool to get files from FTP, GOPHER, HTTP(S) Today portsnap updated the ftp/curl port, and patch-CVE-2013-2174 appeared in files/, but the port version remained such that portaudit, and portupgrade still complain about curl's version. What is the recommended way to
2012 May 30
20
Thoughts on job listings?
How do folks feel about getting Puppet job listings on this list? I''ve rejected a few that we quite spammy, but when the subject matter really is a system admin with puppet experience, the decision becomes a bit different. I''m looking for general feelings. A simple +1 or -1 would be great. Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2002 Dec 12
1
Samba update FreeBSD
Perhaps a rather stupid question, but I have not found the complete correct way to upgrade a Samba installation on FreeBSD. I always use the ports to install the newer version, but after a while I discovered that the installation of the new version did not uninstall the previous version, so when you look at the installed packages (pkg_info) you can see all older versions, they can be uninstalled
2008 Apr 17
3
php5 and postgresql 8.2/8.3
Hi. I have installed php5 with support for postgresql (php5-pgsql). If I install postgresql-client ver. 8.2.7 or 8.3.x apache (httpd) core-dumps. If I install postgresql-client 8.1.11 or 8.2.6 apache does not core-dump. This is the output (backtrace) from gdb: (gdb) bt #0 0x000000080651c340 in ?? () #1 0x000000080094ebd5 in puts () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x000000080094f1ee in gethostbyname
2006 May 22
12
FreeBSD Security Survey
Dear FreeBSD users and system administrators, While the FreeBSD Security Team has traditionally been very good at investigating and responding to security issues in FreeBSD, this only solves half of the security problem: Unless users and administrators of FreeBSD systems apply the security patches provided, the advisories issued accomplish little beyond alerting potential attackers to the
2013 Nov 05
0
Announcing the puppet-bsd google group
With the upcoming release of FreeBSD 10, the recent release of OpenBSD 5.4, and so on, there''s a bunch of new and interesting stuff happening in the BSD world. I''ve created the puppet-bsd google group, with the hopes that it will become a useful resource for BSD users to puppetize their wonderfully BSD infrastructure. You can subscribe/view here:
2012 Jul 15
0
Puppet on Reddit
I figured I''d take to time to remind you guys of the r/puppet subreddit: <http://www.reddit.com/r/puppet> I''m hoping to see it grow more in the lead-up to PuppetConf, mostly because I want to see some interesting blog posts and such before September ;) Cheers - R. Tyler Croy -------------------------------------- Code: http://github.com/rtyler Chatter:
2003 Jul 21
1
portupgrade -PP needs glasses ?
does anybody have the same problem as I have : (running CURRENT, but the problem occurs on STABLE too) latest portupgrade, ports cvsuped today. fully reproductible with any package... am i missing something ? i hope yes... portinstall -PP teTeX ---> Checking the availability of the latest package of 'print/teTeX' ---> Fetching the package(s) for 'teTeX-2.0.2_2'
2003 Oct 02
2
GNOME 2 port is broken?
The gnome2 port is broken? I updated the ports tree two time today, but the result is: rss@DaeMoN:/usr/ports/x11/gnome2> sudo make install clean ===> Installing for gnome2-2.4.0 ===> gnome2-2.4.0 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/libexec/cdplayer_applet2 - found ===> gnome2-2.4.0 depends on executable: gnome-cd - found ===> gnome2-2.4.0 depends on executable: gnome-dictionary -
2007 Oct 01
5
freebsd ports provider patch to use ports tree directly
The included patch is what I''ve been able to throw together in a few hours after studying the pkgtools code. All I''m using the library for at the moment is to resolve the proper base location of the ports tree, but at least by invoking make directly instead of through portupgrade it works *a lot* better. Is there a proper way to include/require a third party ruby library?
2007 Nov 05
1
JSON version of parser.rb
All Facebook API requests have a format option that can be set to JSON, which results in a response which is both faster (marginally so, but still) and uses a lot less bandwidth (http://flickr.com/photos/agentdero/1550274105, http://flickr.com/photos/agentdero/1551136674) Any chance of Facebooker supporting JSON? Aman Gupta
2012 Feb 09
2
Puppet master can not find file_metadata for my puppet module
Hello, I am running a puppet master version 2.7.5 on Centos 5.7 and a puppet agent version 2.7.5. I am simply trying to apply changes to files by defining a file resource in my manifest. When I execute my puppet agent to do the installation it complains it can not find the file meta data. Here is my manifest. class neospeech::config { file { "/usr/vwmrcpd/vwmrcpd/vwmrcpd":
2005 Dec 17
6
i915drm
HI all, I am running FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (of today) on a HP Pavillon (centrino based notebook with i915 graphic chipset). I am trying to use the latest drm hook for i915, but I get this error: drmsub0: <Intel i915GM> port 0x1800-0x1807 mem 0xb0080000-0xb00fffff,0xc0000000-0xcfffffff,0xb0000000-0xb003ffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 error: [drm:pid0:drm_load] *ERROR* Card isn't AGP, or
2003 May 27
2
portupgrade issue 4.8-STABLE
Hi all, Having a bit of a problem with portupgrade on a -STABLE machine: [root@erwin]/root: portupgrade -aRn ---> Session started at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:00 +1000 closed stream ---> Session ended at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:01 +1000 (consumed 00:00:01) [root@erwin]/root: pkgdb -F does the same thing. Any clues? cheers, Rob [root@erwin]/root: uname -a FreeBSD erwin.number6
2013 Jun 26
4
portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?
Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty finding something that will _only_ upgrade what I already have installed, _and_ respect the "options" used during the original