Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "patent issues with Vorbis"
2009 Oct 10
3
Theora patent question
Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement
lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is
it because its use is decentralized?
For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they
succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who
maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to
each individual user
2000 Dec 11
3
YAPQ (Yet Another Patent Question)
Looks like the mpeg gestapo are frantically at work cracking down on mpeg
projects. Several important projects (tsunami mpeg, gogo, faac, etc) were
shut down by the jack booted patent nazis.
Since FhG, mpegla, etc plan to start charging royalties on
everything even remotely mpeg-related very soon, I expect a lot of
interest is going to shift to Vorbis.
And soon thereafter, I expect FhG to attack
2000 Oct 02
2
Fraunhoffer claims patents on other formats
Here in the uk, to get a patent on anything, you have
to prove that the patent is not obvious and that there
is no prior art.
If there is prior art, then a patent cannot be given,
this is why people patenting stuff have to keep it a
secret until they actually have the patent, otherwise
it is considered to have been released into the public
domain.
Once something is in the public domain, nobody
2010 Mar 28
2
Status of s3tc patent in respect to open-source drivers and workarounds
Hi radeonhd, nouveau, mesa3d developers,
Firstly, thank you all very much for all the important work you do.
I've been working as a part-time developer on the "Spring RTS" project
(open-source game engine) which runs on linux (and other os). Some time
ago I tried the engine on the open-source ATI radeonhd driver, which I
understand to be partly based on mesa 3d, and all textures
2016 Nov 02
3
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
>> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to:
>> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.
2015 Oct 21
5
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
Hi David,
Sorry for the delay getting back to you, been a bit buried:
On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:12 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> The TL;DR version of this is that I think we should discuss relicensing all of LLVM under the Apache 2.0 license and add a runtime exception clause. See below for a lot more details.
>
> I agree that this is a problem.
2000 Oct 06
2
Patent troubles...
Hi everyone.
Reading all this posts about patent issues, I thought of something:
if, by some wild chance FhG (or some other audio company) manages
to prove in court that vorbis is breaking their patent rights, you could
do something like LAME developers did: release only source code and
let people do the compiling so that only users that are living in countries
where patents on algorithms are
2000 Oct 06
2
Patent troubles...
Hi everyone.
Reading all this posts about patent issues, I thought of something:
if, by some wild chance FhG (or some other audio company) manages
to prove in court that vorbis is breaking their patent rights, you could
do something like LAME developers did: release only source code and
let people do the compiling so that only users that are living in countries
where patents on algorithms are
2000 Dec 11
3
Here is a link to what they say about "Other Formats"
http://mp3licensing.com/other/index.html
They list:
Atrac 3, (E)Pac, AAC
..and various patents of theirs they believe that these formats
rely on.. then basically say:
"We have not yet determined our licensing policy for this format"
Vorbis is not mentioned..
Regards,
Tom
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage:
2005 Oct 04
12
Sprint Nextel sueing over VoIP patents
Sprint Nextel is sueing vonage, voiceglo and theglobe.com for infringing
on VoIP patents. Sprint Nextel claims to have about 100 patents on VoIP
technologies. Does anyone know which ones this article is talking
about, and if so does asterisk have any of those features?
The reason I am asking is that the article is vague, Vonage uses a
fairly standard codec set, I dont know about the others.
2000 Dec 15
6
patents and separate entropy coding
Hi everyone,
first of all, I searched through the archives for any posts resembling
this, I didn't read all posts about the patents so if this has been
suggested before I apologise.
I read in an article on C|Net (I think, it was linked from Slashdot
anyway) that Thompson are threatening to sue you if Ogg Vorbis becomes a
success. Which is evil, and I'm also mad at them because they never
2016 Nov 03
2
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
>
>
>
> I’m still not completely convinced by this argument, given that the
> majority of patent lawsuits come from NPEs.
That is not necessarily where the majority of patent lawsuit *danger* comes
from, and i'd argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for
LLVM.
> We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could:
>
> 1. Spin up a
2007 Apr 07
2
Verizon Vonage 101
I've dug down as far as I could on www.uspto.gov for
anything remotely close to what is going on with
Verizon and all searches end with only two
possibilities in regards to what is going on.
So unless the patent was issued to someone else and
Verizon bought it, these are the only two possible
patents this case could be based on...
US 7,142,646 B2
Voice mail integration with instant
2000 May 13
1
Patent situation of Vorbis?
Just a question about the state of Vorbis, if I build an application using
Ogg is there a chance anyone sue me to death due to some stupid patent
violation. Is the method used in the Vorbis compression, decompression and
streams free of any patent violations?
*** Frank M. Siegert, frank<at>this.net, frank<at>wizards.de
*** WWW @ http://www.this.net/~frank * http://www.wizards.de
2008 Oct 13
2
Support for CAF in flac command-line?
Michael Crawford wrote:
> Unlike MP3, one
> cannot even distribute the binary of an Open Source player.
Even distributing an MP3 software player requires the payment
of license fees:
http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/software.html
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
2008 Oct 01
1
Software patents (was G723 on asterisk 1.4.1)
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Andrew Joakimsen <joakimsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Tilghman Lesher
> <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:
>> It is completely illegal in any country that recognizes patents.
>
> You mean countries that recognize software patents, right?
As resident of country where the file is hosted - yes we
2004 Aug 06
3
Is Speex realy patent free?
Hi all,
<p>i have readed all the realy sad stuff about software patents in
europe and what allread exists. There is one side related to speex
and i dont know if this is allready discussed here.
Take a look at:
http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/effects/voip/index.en.html
Is speex realy petant free or does patent free only means that
is is not patent by the speex authors? Who have checked that
2007 Aug 14
2
Patent issues, what features we can't use?
Hi everybody,
As the Asterisk community is getting larger and larger, I was wondering that
the features which are provided in Asterisk and are programmed by the open
source community under GPL, or GUIs like FreePBX which also come loaded with
wonderful features and uses same Asterisk, are they anywhere violating any
patent laws? Most of the features work the same way as Nortel, Avaya and
other
2004 Feb 10
3
DV format patent status
Hi folks,
I was curious what's known about the patent situation with the DV
format. Google turns up a number of press articles describing it as an
"open standard with no associated licensing fees" but also, for example,
US Patent number 5,691,81 which, while I've not done a careful
comparison of the claims, sounds like it covers the block-rearrangement
scheme that's the
2005 Sep 30
4
G.729 patent in France
Hi all,
I am building an Asterisk PBX with voicemail and music on hold functions.
An ISDN BRI line will also be available and G.729 IP-phones will be used.
Are there patents rights applicable to France?
Which licence could I use and how many ones are required (only one per phone
or also for voicemail and MOH)?
Regards
Amaury
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML