Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "version number"
2002 Jan 19
2
some EAQUAL results
For those who are interested, I've run 3 EAQUAL tests on both the LAME and
OGG encoders: LAME with the --alt-standard preset (with and without
--nspsytune) and OGGENC (RC3) with -q 6 (my personal "sweet spot")
I am somewhat unsure though about the validity of these tests, since the
original and decoded files were not the same size (2 KB difference). The LAME
encoded files were also
2002 Jun 23
5
(Un)Usefulness of Vorbisgain?
I've just Replaygained several of my Vorbis albums with Vorbisgain, ranging
from 80's metal to present day soft rock. What I don't understand is why does
Vorbisgain actually make all tracks QUIETER? I see an average of -7db on
most albums. And after that, not only are they substantially quieter than my
MP3s (which is a pain), but it also fails to really "even out" the volume.
2002 Jan 03
5
quality settings
ARGH! I am at a complete loss as to which OGG quality settings to use: 8?
10? 3?
I'd like to be able to listen to my primarily Rock oriented music on a
high-end system (though I don't own one - yet) without any noticeable sound
degradation, but I don't want to go total overkill with -q 10. With LAME, I at
least used to know 192 kbps with -q0 was a perfect size/quality proportion. I
2002 Jan 20
1
just wondering...
Has anyone from the Vorbis team been in contact with the LAME camp? I'm sure
with their knowledge, the people developing LAME could make a major
contribution to the OGG development, if they were willing. Sure, MP3 and OGG are in
some ways majorly different, but they are similarities, right? With the latest
stable release of 3.91, I think the LAME crew has done their best and pulled
a helluva
2002 Jan 02
2
Winamp equalizer problems
I just wanted to know if anyone has noticed a difference between MP3 and OGG
encoded files when having the Winamp equalizer switched on? I seem to be
missing bass and the sound doesn't fill the room as much with OGG. With the EQ
turned off there is no discernable difference between both LAME and Vorbis
encoded files (both at an average of 192 kbps). Is this an error with the OGG
Winamp plugin?
2002 Jun 20
5
When will quality increase be unnoticable?
I started thinking about this after doing a little testing with AAC, MP3 and
Ogg Vorbis. I was comparing the different formats at similiar bitrates.
After a while I finally realized that they all sound more or less the same to me.
>From 160 kbps on, I usually cannot detect any difference between a lossy
encoding and the original source. If LAME is used, I have to strain to notice
anything at
2012 Jul 25
2
libogg 1.3.0 ?
Hi,
today I learned that libogg 1.3.0 had been released in August 2011. Curiously, there seems to have been no announcement mail here, and it is not being mentioned on <http://www.xiph.org/press/> either. Is that on purpose? Is there some other channel I could subscribe to in order to learn about updates? Freecode.com doesn't have up-to-date info either (though I just submitted a 1.3.0
2002 Oct 10
1
Re: Ogg Spec, etc.
> And as long as the spec contains errors, it makes no sense at all
> as Moritz did to claim, that everyone is free to implement their
> own encoder or decoder, or as Jon did to claim that the file format
> is documented.
Actually, people have implemented perfectly valid Vorbis encoders and
decoders before the specification was even published. I wouldn't go so far
as to call other
2002 Jul 25
2
libvorbis-1.0 bug with solaris 5.8 re: apsort
I have found a bug in libvorbis-1.0. I have found a fix, but need to know
in what format and to where to sumbit the patch. It involves a quirky qsort
in Solaris 5.8 that dumps core without the patch.
The fix involves editing vorbis/lib/psy.c
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a
2020 Jul 07
2
new 1.3.7 and fix for CVE-2018-10392 (issue 2335)?
Hi Ralph,
Again, thanks so much for doing all this! Plus thanks to all the folks who contributed to the new release!
Quick clarifying question -- Isn't CVE-2018-10392 (looks like it’s fixed in https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis/-/issues/2335) also included in new version 1.3.7? If so can you please add it to release notes?
(I asked the same question in
2004 Aug 06
4
ices2 compile error, ignore previous msg
Oops!
I accidently sent the previous message before I finished it, sorry!
However, the problem remains the same. I cannot succesfully compile ices2 for
some reason. I've followed some instructions I found on the web at
http://www.6809.org.uk/kja3/ices2-howto.shtml.
So far, what I've done is:
1) Installation of Slackware 8.1 (with libxml2 2.4.22, gcc 2.95.3)
2) Update of the oggutils
2011 Apr 26
3
updating libvorbis
Hello,
On a machine with CentOS-5.6, I need libvorbis >= 1.2, so I have
recompiled and packaged libvorbis.
But I get the following error :
$ rpm -U /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/libvorbis-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/libvorbis-devel-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64.rpm
package libvorbis-1.1.2-3.el5_4.4.x86_64 (which is newer than libvorbis-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64) is already
2008 Sep 12
4
[Patch] New function of libvorbis
This patch offers interface to get the library name which software uses.
Function:
char *vorbis_version_string(void);
PATCH (for libvorbis-1.2.1RC2):
diff -crN libvorbis-1.2.1RC2/include/vorbis/codec.h libvorbis-1.2.1RC2_NI/include/vorbis/codec.h
*** libvorbis-1.2.1RC2/include/vorbis/codec.h Mon Aug 25 05:57:44 2008
--- libvorbis-1.2.1RC2_NI/include/vorbis/codec.h Sat Sep 13 05:00:22 2008
2001 May 11
2
artifact bug status? / compiling under OpenBSD 2.8
Hi!
On March 17th I posted a message on this list concerning an artifact bug
in beta4 that is audible in all available bitrates. It was this rumbling
sound in the bass area. I made a demo clip, which still is available at
http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~us87/ogg/vorbis_bassrumble_demo.rar
and that contains both the original .WAV and an .OGG @ 350kbps. This
archive is 2.1 MB large.
Today, I
2005 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote:
> I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group with
> a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more
> bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I
> belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the
> ideas will get and the more
2007 Jul 26
2
libvorbis 1.2.0 release
A new libvorbis release is now available.
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/vorbis/libvorbis-1.2.0.tar.bz2
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/vorbis/libvorbis-1.2.0.tar.gz
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/vorbis/libvorbis-1.2.0.zip
This release fixes some robustness issues with corrupt streams,
including a security issue. Also new in this release is support
for multiplexed streams in
2004 Dec 29
0
Need @OGG_LIBS@ added to libvorbisfile_la_LIBADD in trunk/vorbis/lib/Makefile.am
I'm trying to build libvorbis-1.1.0 on Cygwin and I discovered a missing
dependency that may not affect other platforms. I found that I had to
add -logg to the libvorbisfile.la rule in the Makefile. Working its way
back upstream through configure and autogen, it looks like the following
line in trunk/vorbis/lib/Makefile.am
libvorbisfile_la_LIBADD = libvorbis.la
just needs to be changed
2005 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
Hello everyone,
The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public
release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users
and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support
them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has
undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to
new platforms. We expect that
2005 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
Hi OG,
I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group
with a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more
bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I
belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the
ideas will get and the more people will get committed to start and finish
the task.
2004 Aug 06
2
possible solution...?
Uaaargh ... between now and the last mail, everything's gone kaploohey.
But I doubt that it concerns icecast too much in this case - the
streaming computer has a cpu load of 90-100% for no reason (it's an
athlon 1ghz with only winamp and ssh and the system monitor running
under win98). The playback on the streaming computer sounds good,
though, but what reaches the client side is no more