similar to: ReplayGain support for Vorbis

Hi all, I have implemented ReplayGain support for Vorbis. If you are not familiar with it, it is basically a method of making sure all your files have equal loudness, remove the need for normalization and prevent clipping during playback. The process is totally lossless, and supporting it requires minimal work. More info about the exact workings can be found on www.replaygain.org (recommended

Hi! I am very pleased with the progress that Ogg is making, expecially after I read the latest comparision tests on http://ff123.net/128test/instruct.html that put OGG on top aside with MPC. BUT the APPLAUD.WAV test case ( http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/applaud.wav ) still produces **VERY** easily audible high-frequency artifacts when encoded with OGG RC3 up to q4.9 (!!!). Things

Hi all, I started testing the RC1 encoder at ftp://sjeng.sourceforge.net/pub/sjeng/oggdrop.exe (based on branch_monty_20010708) On the songs I have tested so far (not much :) I did not hear any stereo issues, but there are some very noticeable problems with the produced files. Songs without much high-end will suddenly have one when encoded. (you'd expect it the other way around) It

After doing an informal (128k) listening test, I have concluded that I prefer Beta4 over RC2. The 16kHz low-pass on the RC2 encoder makes it sound like FM radio. Both encoders SEEM to have a couple of dB bump at 10kHz. JT --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

And thats only a player. What about an (Open Source) encoder? Nah, I'll stick with OGG for the time being. Regards, Mark -- Mark de Bokx Internet Service Engineer ICT Communication and Media Services PlanetMediaGroup the Netherlands "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty not safety." --Benjamin Franklin

---------- > Van: ORK <korsmo@solungen.hm.no> > Aan: vorbis@xiph.org > Onderwerp: [vorbis] OggEnc help file > Datum: maandag 3 september 2001 18:21 > > Somebody asked how to use OggEnc a while ago. > > OggEnc v0.8 (libvorbis rc2) > (c) 2001 Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au) > > Usage: oggenc [options] input.wav [...] LOL! --- >8 ---- List

This new ReplayGain feature is cool, but made all my .mp3 and .mod files sound so loud, so I wrote a Winamp DSP plugin that: - If a file is playing that is not known, a ReplayGain value will be calculated while playing. - If a file is known, the ReplayGain value is applied. What that means is that my .mp3 files now sound as loud as my .oggs. I hacked this thing together very quick, so

In case you missed it, RC2 is on slashdot.org too: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/13/1811241 BTW Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote on /. that RC3 should appear very soon (in a week or so)? Also, it looks like Wall Street Journal article is not available on-line (at least to non-registered persons). If someone is registered or have a paper edition, please post this article somewhere so that we

I would very much like a lowpass option because for FM radio broadcasting I don't want to encode frequencies above 15khz. I'm waiting for this option before switching to ogg from mp3(lame). Ross. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of > Gian-Carlo Pascutto > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 01:46 > To:

>No big deal. I thought someone might be interested in a bug report. I >guess not. Your report is very much appreciated. Thanks! I hope the fixed version works for you. Hint to other posters: It never hurts to check the facts before wildly speculating and preaching about shells and operating systems. Thank you. -- GCP <p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

As far as I can see, transcoding could be usefull for people who do not primarly care about quality but about filesizes. One could assume that such a user would have a collection of mp3's at 128kbps or higher bitrates, and uses an encoder like BladeEnc or Xing. He wants to take uses of ogg's supposed quality and transcode his 128-or-higher files into 96 or 112kbps oggs to save diskspace.

Hello -- I desperately want to start using Ogg compression on music I release on the internet, but I am encountering a fair amount of artifacts. I noticed some in beta4 and was hoping they would disappear with RC1. However, I've been playing with RC2 and I've still been banging my head into a number of problems. A majority of the music I make has long drones with a fair amount of spectral

Hi Martjn, and everyone, Apologies if I have missed the reply, but I think I have not got any comment so far on this. That means our new ID request is accepted? What should I do next to proceed?? Apparently this is my first time here, so appreciate any advice assistance. Best regards, Taku From: Kurosawa, Taku Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 8:41 PM To: 'Martijn van Beurden'

Hi all, ome people asked if it was possible to make an even higher quality mode by incorporating some of the changes from the first tuned version into the 350kbps mode. I did so and made a new version with this new mode. It gives bitrates from roughly 300-350kbps. That's a lot, but it also gets very hard to find something it artifacts on :) Should be sufficient for archival quality. In

Hello everyone, I'm new to this flac thing (started about a week ago) but I have read a lot about flac and replaygain. As far as I understand it, replaygain is lossless in the sense that I can tell my player to ignore the settings or I can even use foobar2000 to remove the tags entirely, hence getting back to the original audio. If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000

> You don't. Audio CDs don't support ReplayGain tags. The only thing > you may do on Audio CDs is to use Volume Normalize techniques > available on certain programs. Normalization of sound is not a good, > clean thing, though. Surely it would be possible to have something apply the ReplayGain to the WAV after decoding and prior to writing them to CD... but I don't know

Hey When playing an http ogg stream served by icecast, ogg123 (vorbis-tools-1.0.1) seems to detect replaygain metadata because it displays it in a nice way, but does ogg123 actually alter the playback volume according to the replaygain variables? I can notice no effect. I did some googling on this but didn't find much help. I discovered a vgplay patch for vorbis-tools 1.0.1 but after

Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So,

In this topic on Hydrogen Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain. The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since Commit http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=0554a4aee6966bc5b251364753ef85de72dfab19 because as of 1.3.0 FLAC supports Replaygain with many

Hi! I have a few questions about the log files icecast produces, plus I have a little issue with replaygain but lets start with the icecast log stuff: If a client (listener) connects to icecast at, say, 12:00, the connection time is stored in the access log about 15-30 minutes later (or on disconnection). Is it possible to get icecast to log client connections immediately with the correct