similar to: (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded TAGS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [ Sorry for sending this twice; I sent it to the vorbis-dev list by mistake. ] The ALBUM, ARTIST, TITLE, and TRACKNUMBER tags aren't sufficient for classical music. MP3 muffed it, but since Vorbis is so flexible, I'd like to propose that ogg123 recognize and display the following optional tags, instead of giving an error message that it doesn't

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [ Sorry for sending this twice; I sent it to the vorbis-dev list by mistake. ] The ALBUM, ARTIST, TITLE, and TRACKNUMBER tags aren't sufficient for classical music. MP3 muffed it, but since Vorbis is so flexible, I'd like to propose that ogg123 recognize and display the following optional tags, instead of giving an error message that it doesn't

I mentioned sub-tagging in an earlier post. Here's a more in-depth mail on what i thought of. One of the debates going on here are whether ARTIST is worthy of life. Another is whether the average user will bother filling in the detailed info Jonathan wants. Of course, all tags are optional, but nevertheless we should have a tagging-system that pleases _the_users_, that is, everybody: 1.

Based on peoples posts to this list, and feedback on IRC (irc.openprojects.net #vorbis) I have updated the original proposal. You can read it here. Please read it before writing any futher questions, comments, or criticisms of the proposal. http://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt Cheers Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: part Type:

Hi, <p>here's my €0.02 on that topic. First of all, all those new tags are total overkill to be standardized. They're only useful for people who both tag OGG files for a living and listen to classical music only. Imagine what will happen when the Jazz fans, and the Techno fans, and the Rock fans and who knows else demands his very own, customized + standardized set of tags. And

In an effort to redeem my earlier flame, here is my attempt at rewording the standard to correct the flaws I see in it. The latest draft as writting by Jonathan is prefixed with >>. My comments have > before them. My rewritten version includes no line prefix. >>Jonathon Walther wrote: >David Mitchell commented: A Modest Proposal >>Proposal for a Vorbis TAG Standard

I change a lot of my CD to Ogg to be able to listen them easily from my computer (I use foobar, I was used to WMP but it does not support library for Ogg files and plug-ins I found for this where poor) without the need for frequent CD changing. I like my music to be richly tagged. But with classical music CD it is a real pain to tag those files. Typical problems involve: - single CD

I've read through what I think is the entire thread and looked at the standard in its current incarnation (https://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt). I have only one major problem with the proposed standard at the moment. The existance of both PERFORMER and ENSEMBLE tags. I think this is describing the same type of data (ENSEMBLE = thing that performed the music, PERFORMER = thing that

I've read through what I think is the entire thread and looked at the standard in its current incarnation (https://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt). I have only one major problem with the proposed standard at the moment. The existance of both PERFORMER and ENSEMBLE tags. I think this is describing the same type of data (ENSEMBLE = thing that performed the music, PERFORMER = thing that

On Tuesday 11. September 2007 02:54:19 David K. Gasaway wrote: > On 11 Sep 2007 at 2:17, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > (BTW, you replied to me personally .. just in case that wasn't > intentional) Oh yes, sorry about that. > > On Tuesday 11. September 2007 02:11:01 David K. Gasaway wrote: > > > This things are easily solved with vorbis comments ... Provided you >

Jonathan added to the proposal the following definition: ARTIST for information to be displayed on systems with limited display capabilities. it is not a replacement for the ENSEMBLE and PERFORMER tags, but typically will summarize them. As I understand the aim is to provide more compatibility with players (especially portable) that are so dumb as to display only "ARTIST",

Hi, Peter Pawlowski's new (1.15beta) winamp decoder plugin seems quite nice, in my opinion.. The "title formatting logic" is what I've been dreaming of for ages.. Right now I've chosen "%artist / [[%[abbr20]album][-%[num2]tracknumber] / ]%title[ - %version]" I get titles such as "Artist / Title"or "Artist / Album / Title" or "Artist /

Hey all. Ok, so I'll stand up and be counted a newbie in this list too (just did the same for the General discussion list). I (once again) read through the archives, especially the ones concerning the comment field. First, I'm not a developer, per se. I'm merely an anal-retentive power user of such things, who likes to have my music archived, and sorted. In reading through the

I wish to add flac support to my Windows audio player so I wanted to ask a few questions. I rely on another lib for decoding/playing flac audio files so all I need to explicitly add support for is reading/writing flac metadata. 1st: I've downloaded libflac and have begun browsing. Is there a simple way to identify and carve out the pieces needed only for metadata i/o? Or will I have to

So before i knew better, i encoded a lot of my CDs in flac and added id3 tags (they worked, so great!). I know i've seen mention of others doing this; anyone gone to the trouble to write a tag conversion tool? Shouldn't be too tough, but i'd rather not reinvent the wheel. danno -- dan pritts danno@umich.edu 734-929-9770

I wanted to post publicly my problem with Jonathan's proposed album requirements. Although I do apologize, since this thread is too big already. The idea that as a requirement one should be able to identify the exact CD a track was ripped from is not a valid requirement in my book (not for the tags at least), and I hope I can explain why. Without knowing the exact way Jonathan wishes to

A new recording is now up on pan.zipcon.net and also gas.zipcon.net. Here is the Readme: The Virtuoso Trombonist Dennis Smith plays with W.W.S.S Wind Ensemble Wm Cole, Conductor, and with Martha Goldstein, organ. At ogg q=7. <p>In the years befor world war 2, Sunday afternoons might be spent in the park listening to the Municipal band. Selections 1 and 2 would be this kind of

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38984 Summary: xorg-nouveau: Segfault after gdm3 login, EQ overflowing, GeForce 8600 GT (backtrace attached) Product: xorg Version: 7.6 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component:

Hi, having inspected one of the files found at music.ibiblio.org, I realized that the comments are quite poor or misformatted in the files. I'm telling you, because: 1) I think it's great to have some free music 2) I think the performers deserve to be recognized Generally, I'd put as much as possible into the Vorbis comments. Then you could skip creating these index.html manually:

The biggest problem with Vorbis comments are too loose specifications and too little standardisation. Another problem is attribution of involved parties. Currently only the ARTIST field name is supported in software. More standardised field names need to be worked out for organisations and persons involved in the production of the recording. See: