similar to: Request for Standardization: classical music TAGS

A month or two ago I sent an email to this list proposing to expand the list of "standard" tags for Ogg Vorbis. No tag would be required, but if you wanted to encode certain types of information about a file, you could use a standard tag. I went through the whole discussion, and revised my proposal in light of all the comments from everyone. Here is the updated proposal. This

Based on peoples posts to this list, and feedback on IRC (irc.openprojects.net #vorbis) I have updated the original proposal. You can read it here. Please read it before writing any futher questions, comments, or criticisms of the proposal. http://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt Cheers Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: part Type:

In an effort to redeem my earlier flame, here is my attempt at rewording the standard to correct the flaws I see in it. The latest draft as writting by Jonathan is prefixed with >>. My comments have > before them. My rewritten version includes no line prefix. >>Jonathon Walther wrote: >David Mitchell commented: A Modest Proposal >>Proposal for a Vorbis TAG Standard

I change a lot of my CD to Ogg to be able to listen them easily from my computer (I use foobar, I was used to WMP but it does not support library for Ogg files and plug-ins I found for this where poor) without the need for frequent CD changing. I like my music to be richly tagged. But with classical music CD it is a real pain to tag those files. Typical problems involve: - single CD

Hi, <p>here's my €0.02 on that topic. First of all, all those new tags are total overkill to be standardized. They're only useful for people who both tag OGG files for a living and listen to classical music only. Imagine what will happen when the Jazz fans, and the Techno fans, and the Rock fans and who knows else demands his very own, customized + standardized set of tags. And

I mentioned sub-tagging in an earlier post. Here's a more in-depth mail on what i thought of. One of the debates going on here are whether ARTIST is worthy of life. Another is whether the average user will bother filling in the detailed info Jonathan wants. Of course, all tags are optional, but nevertheless we should have a tagging-system that pleases _the_users_, that is, everybody: 1.

On 10 Sep 2007 at 18:42, Ian Malone wrote: > Classical music is a rich source of examples; works are > most often associated with a composer but you may still > care who the performers or conductors were. A piece may > be split across several movements which may be even further > broken down into tracks on the source. This things are easily solved with vorbis comments ...

heyas- I believe there is a need for a standard vorbis comment field to encode "Total Number of Tracks (on a CD)". Why we need this -------------------- - Existing Vorbis programs already implement this, inconsistently, and hence don't interoperate. These seems the key reason to me. - MP3s include this - Some software (e.g., iTunes) uses this information, e.g., to display

Daniel, before you step over everything that has been done before, we need to determine what exactly is the use case for your new specification. What concerns metadata, we currently have: * vorbiscomment - this is a header at the beginning of a logical bitstream which has metadata that refers to the complete file; there is a specification, which has been public for a long time and is the

Hey all. Ok, so I'll stand up and be counted a newbie in this list too (just did the same for the General discussion list). I (once again) read through the archives, especially the ones concerning the comment field. First, I'm not a developer, per se. I'm merely an anal-retentive power user of such things, who likes to have my music archived, and sorted. In reading through the

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | Black APC 940-0024C Smart Signalling UPS Cable Wiring Diagram | | This information is verified and tested to be 100% correct. | | |

I have read some posts about using FLAC to archive CD collections and would like to get some feedback. I am torn between creating a bin and cue file with CDDB info and compressing that down with FLAC as a single file or the second method of ripping all the files out to wav and converting to FLAC and maybe saving the cue file in attempt to use it later. The first method I believe will pretty much

I've read through what I think is the entire thread and looked at the standard in its current incarnation (https://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt). I have only one major problem with the proposed standard at the moment. The existance of both PERFORMER and ENSEMBLE tags. I think this is describing the same type of data (ENSEMBLE = thing that performed the music, PERFORMER = thing that

I see that this was the right place to fire off this question. Thanks for your feedback. It has given me a base to start some trials. I used to use EAC on Windows, but I tend to only use open source software as much as possible and I don't use Windows any more. I gave a brief look at abcde, but it is clear I need to look at this some more. It looks like it has the potential to do everything I

I've read through what I think is the entire thread and looked at the standard in its current incarnation (https://reactor-core.org/~djw/ogg-tags.txt). I have only one major problem with the proposed standard at the moment. The existance of both PERFORMER and ENSEMBLE tags. I think this is describing the same type of data (ENSEMBLE = thing that performed the music, PERFORMER = thing that

Hi, Bit late to join in the discussion but I've just read through the CD archiving discussion and was particular interested in Dax's method, described here (also included below): http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/2006-September/000611.html So far I've just been flac-ing my CDs to individual one-flac-per-track files, however it appears I've been missing some of the other bits

I just uploaded a new FLAC FAQ: http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html Let me know if I forgot any common questions. Josh __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to use flac to make backups of my CD collection, and am running into problems with disks that contain a pregap (or lead-in) before the start of track one. cdrdao rips these disks *WITHOUT* the pregap, and puts a PREGAP entry into the cue file. For my test CD (Police, Synchronicity, catalog# 0082839373524) I get (in part): TRACK 01

So there are no command line options like in oggenc to do artist and misc tags? Sure if you've got a solution that I don't have to do from scratch then post away! :-) Thanks! Chris benny k. wrote: >hi chris, > >On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:22:06AM -0700, Chris Hirsch wrote: > >>Hey all..I'm brand new to FLAC and learning to use it. Can somebody tell >>me how

I've got a run of Shielded Twisted Pair (4 conductors) which used to be a Token Ring Network drop and I'm not using it anymore. Would it be decent to replace the ends with normal analog phone connectors and use it for a phone extension, or is STP unsuitable for that? Thanks Steve