similar to: Network management function of tinc

Dear C?dric, If I am using windows version of tinc, how can I check the connection list? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] On Behalf Of tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:00 PM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: tinc Digest, Vol 90, Issue 17 Send tinc mailing list submissions to tinc at

Hi, Something strange is happening at my place: I have lots of packet loss in my tinc vpn. Network layout: laptop --- wifi --- other pc ping from laptop to other pc OUTSIDE tinc: 0% packet loss ping from laptop to other pc VIA tinc: 50% packet loss What could be the cause of that? Folkert van Heusden -- Always wondered what the latency of your webserver is? Or how much more latency you

Hi, I have a routing problem. When i start tinc it creates the following route in the main routing table. 192.168.2.0/24 dev nb003004 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.8 The problem is that i want to use extra routing tables for each tinc vpn. When i set the netmask for the tinc device to 255.255.255.255. The route is not created, how can i add it to a another route table. Setting a

Hello, I just read this document, especially the section about Tinc : http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/linux_vpn.txt It's an old one, but i would like to know the state of the Tinc security level for now. I don't scared about possible security weakness of Tinc because i only use it over our internal operator network (MPLS), but maybe one day will come the need to connect a

Hello all, It would be a great feature if QOS could be implemented in Tinc. It's not to do any sort of comparison, but with OpenVPN, the traffic can be shapped. In the way that tinc works as mesh VPN, the great feature would be to fix a shapping value on each nodes, known and respected by each others. (like MPLS does) As an exemple, you've got 3 nodes A,B and C, you want Tinc flows on A

Hello list, I use tinc with QOS, and since some weeks I got problem with tunnel disconnection because the default "Pingtimeout" of 5 sec is reach. I think it happens because of the QOS shappe the tinc traffic (data here) to let some BP for VOIP, but whate is very strange is that the ICMP protocol is not include in the shapping, so tinc would never 'see' latency on the link,

Hello, Our Asterisk runs with multiple remote sites (12 over an MPLS network), everything works fine except for the last site we have juste installed. When VOIP flows comes/goes from/to this site, there are sound quality issues, persistent, 100% reproducible, on every call. This is not a bandwidth or latency or jitter problem, everything is fine on the network. Our MPLS provider does all check

Hello, I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: 1. when a file is created, the "trusted.bit-rot.signature? attribute seems only created approximatively 120 seconds after its creations (the cluster is idle and there is only one file living on it). Why ? Is there a way to make this attribute generated at the same time of the file creation ? 2. corrupting a file

Hi Sweta, Thanks, this drive me some more questions: 1. What is the reason of delaying signature creation ? 2. As a same file (replicated or dispersed) having different signature thought bricks is by definition an error, it would be good to triggered it during a scrub, or with a different tool. Is something like this planned ? Cheers ? C?dric Lemarchand > On 18 Apr 2018, at 07:53, Sweta

Hi Cedric, Any file is picked up for signing by the bitd process after the predetermined wait of 120 seconds. This default value is captured in the volume option 'features.expiry-time' and is configurable - in your case, it can be set to 0 or 1. Point 2 is correct. A file corrupted before the bitrot signature is generated will not be successfully detected by the scrubber. That would

Hello, It seems there is some rights problem with https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub <https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub> : wget -O /dev/null https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub <https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub> --2017-01-23 19:28:47--

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

Hello, I have removed a nod from my tinc network, but his informations (owned subnet and ip address) are still present in the internal routing table. I think that even if the node is not reachable anymore (his ip is, but not the tinc daemon on it), his routing information "lives" beetween nodes. Is this possible or do i need to sleep a bit !? ;-) Do i need to stop all nodes, then

Hi, If your cluster's virtual IP is using ip aliasing (eg eth0:0), i think your problem come from UDP flows, they are, in opposition to TCP flows, unconnected, so the IP stack take the shortest route/interface to send them, wich is when this is the default route, the real interface and not the aliased. For exemple if you have eth0 the real, eth0:0 the virtual, you can try to add in your

Hello, I have a Legrand Keor T [1] monitored via snmp, everything seems to work fine, upsc output looks good [2] except that I can?t get the low battery state "OB LB? as usual (it works fine with others UPS like APC or Dell). Here is the configuration : [lgups] driver = snmp-ups port = 192.168.99.60 community = public snmp_version = v2c mibs = auto

Hi all, I use tinc since 2 years between my MPLS sites in router mode, works like a charm. Today i am trying to make an ethernet bridge beetween 2 sites for video conference needs, the raison is that 1 side is behind nat, and i dont have access on the gate, other side is on public range. Because off H323 that doesn't handle unconfigured NAT, i would like to give a public IP to the video

??? This is solved. ? Problem was, incorrect settings in slapd.conf and dynamic / config file setup was mixed. ? str2entry: invalid value for attributeType objectClass #1 (syntax?1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38) slapcat: bad configuration file! The core.schema and the core.ldif are bit different. debian installs slapd with dynamic ( in database ) config, when switch back to config file setup. The

Hello everyone, I'm writing you a topic because i have a problem with smaba and LDAP. This is my problem, when I type in the shell slapcat, i've got this message : str2entry: invalid value for attributeType objectClass #1 (syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38) slapcat: bad configuration file! There is my slapd.conf : include /etc/ldap/schema/core.schema include

Hello, hello I'm writing you this email because when i want to set up a password policy with LDAP, this one isn't recognize by samba. In the log i've got this : ldapsam_getgroup: Did not find group, filter was (&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(sambaSID=S-1-5-11)) ldapsam_getgroup: Did not find group, filter was (&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(sambaSID=S-1-5-2))

I too was curious about this, so I copied the text into Babel Fish, and this is the result: I miss of the 2/04/2007 to the 11/04/2007. I will answer your message as of my return. For any urgency, to contact Emmanuelle Parache Moga or C?dric Buzay. If this guy is really going to be out until November these messages will get rather tiresome... John Beaman Telecom Specialist Voice