similar to: tcp-only still needed?

Well this has had me stumped for days now. For months I've been using tinc in TCPOnly because I always received the unknown host error when using UDP. On Monday, i set the flag IndirectData = yes in my host files, and removed the TCPOnly line. Initially, everything worked great. My throughput increased from 600KB/sec to 2MB/sec between the sites. However, I also did some testing with

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Hans de Groot wrote: > hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc > > Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted > via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from > hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. > > hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service

AHOI! I've big trouble by setting up CentOS 6.3 for my new vDSL. As I've found out, the German Telekom is using VLAN7 for her internet-(data) connections. => http://workaround.org/blog/vdsl O.K. what I've done: The NIC where's my DSL-modem is connectet is eth0. cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 # device for vDSL-modem DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:30:1B:14:08:67

Hello! I have 3 PCs - Windows, FreeBSD and Ubuntu. FreeBSD runs as a tinc server as it has a real IP. Ubuntu runs as a tinc client as it has a dynamically changing public IP. Windows has not tinc installed yet. Therefore I use Putty ssh client to ssh to FreeBSD machine (as it has real IP) and then from there I ssh to the Ubuntu box using its virtual IP. The connection establishes well, I can ping

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those. > Although it probably just hit the CPU

Hi everybody. Is there a way to have a list of reacheable partners and its connection status? I need to list all partners in any tinc instance, its status (connected / disconnected) and connection method (direct, relayed thru other partner, etc.) Thanks! -- *Ing. Guillermo Bisheimer* *B&S Sistemas de Control y Equipamientos* Av. de los Constituyentes 1172 (E3116CIX) Crespo, Entre Ríos

Hi, I´m using Tinc for several years, but I didn´t fix a performance problem. There a about 20 nodes in this network. Master: 10.0.0.12 (dedicated host in a datacenter, debian, 100mBit port) tinc.conf: Name = TincKnoten12 AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tun ProcessPriority=high mode = router #DirectOnly = no Compression=0 PMTUDiscovery = yes #IndirectData = yes #ReplayWindow = 64 #ConnectTo

Hello, response time: how is it possible to increase the response time on Tinc VPNs. When I use tinc over a fast or giga-bit network connection the ping-response time is normally about 1800 to 2000 ms. Sometimes I get ping response times at about 2.500 to 3.000 ms over a normal Ethernet Connection or a television-cable connection within the same providers-network in the same city. The ping-time

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > > This change is not so good: > > > > Connection with aaa_vpnhub1 (1.2.3.4 port 443) activated > > Error while translating addresses: ai_family not supported > > > > (And then the tinc process exists) > > Hm, I couldn't reproduce

Hi there, I am using tinc since some monthes. I think the basic idea of extending vpn to a mesh of systems via tun/tap is great. And I think it is one of the useable developments compared to the much more complex vpn solutions I had used in the past. Great work. Setting up tinc I have fought with the configuration (and with the concepts) for a while as I have found no example that covers my

Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc versions 1.0.33. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.0.33: * Allow compilation from a build directory. * Source code cleanups. * Fix some options specified on the command line not surviving a HUP signal. * Handle tun/tap device returning EPERM or EBUSY. * Disable PMTUDiscovery when TCPOnly is used. * Support the --runstatedir option of

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc versions 1.0.33. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.0.33: * Allow compilation from a build directory. * Source code cleanups. * Fix some options specified on the command line not surviving a HUP signal. * Handle tun/tap device returning EPERM or EBUSY. * Disable PMTUDiscovery when TCPOnly is used. * Support the --runstatedir option of

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre16. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.1pre16: * Fixed building with support for UML sockets. * Documentation updates and spelling fixes. * Support for MSS clamping of IP-in-IP packets. * Fixed parsing of the -b flag. * Added the ability to set a firemall mark on sockets on Linux. * Minor improvements to the build system.

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre16. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.1pre16: * Fixed building with support for UML sockets. * Documentation updates and spelling fixes. * Support for MSS clamping of IP-in-IP packets. * Fixed parsing of the -b flag. * Added the ability to set a firemall mark on sockets on Linux. * Minor improvements to the build system.

I was given the challenge recently of creating a LAN-LAN bridge between two buildings several hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and without having to resort to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 megabit link for about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black Box VDSL Ethernet Extender, which

Hi Sven, 2008/1/25, Sven Koch <haegar at sdinet.de>: > Package: nut > Version: 2.2.1-1 > Severity: normal > > I am using a Mustec PowerMust 1000 USB, connected with a USB cable to > the PC. > > With nut 2.2.0-2.1 everything works without problems - but since the > 2.2.1-1 update the "upsdrvctl start" from the init script just fails, > executing the

Dear I am testing tinc on Windows and found some interesting behavior. I used "TCPOnly" parameter for both end because I wanted to go through NAT. However, by using TCPOnly parameter, the response of PING slowed down significantly. The PING response with UDP is about 4ms, but it bumped up to 2000ms with TCP. I am just curious whether this is caused by using TCP. Regards Masateru

I've just got Uverse installed. I had dsl, but ATT insisted I couldn't keep my old dsl, but had to switch to Uverse internet - vdsl. My setup: linux box as router : 10.10.11.252 asterisk box: 10.10.11.180 10.10.11.252 is multihomed and connected to the Uverse Residential Gateway. I've set it up as DMZplus, and it shows the public ip address as eth1. I can ssh into the