similar to: [Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-05-29 23:45 ------- iptables calls getsockopt() twice, first with SO_GET_INFO which locks the table in kernel and returns some info and then unlocks the table, among that info is the size of the table. Then iptables allocates memory and calls getsockopt() again but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter-bugzilla@ratty.org.uk 2003-11-22 16:15 ------- I'm seeing the same problem here. We're grabbing byte counts from around 2000 rules with iptables -nvxL from a minutely cron job and occasionally the counts come back as zero or a few packets worth of bytes and then return to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 Summary: Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.8 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=542 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-02-13

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=404 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-03-12

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-04-21

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=408 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 14:58 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=201) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=201&action=view) patch Fixed by this patch, thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET ------- I can reproduce this, but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=508 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-14 13:18 MET ------- Did you enable nf_conntrack and the ipv6 connection tracking module? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-10-13 07:47 MET ------- Please add a dump of the packet in question from both sides of the firewall and the corresponding /proc/net/ip_conntrack entry. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=808 Summary: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED OS/Version|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-18

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=530 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-09

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-05-14 02:39 ------- I've captured some non-fragmented tcp packets which show this behaviour with 2.4.21-rc2. They look badly damaged. The destination ip doesn't match the mac but they come from valid connections. Setting interface mtu to 1486 helps which makes me

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=531 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-11 19:00 MET ------- Very nice catch. I guess it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=422 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-03-12 19:51 MET ------- I also agree to this. Anyone want to send a patch? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=559 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-04-11 21:02 MET ------- Looks like 32/64 bit issues. Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=532 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-26 19:45 MET ------- (In reply to comment #0) >