similar to: [Bug 1] wrong packet/byte counters on sparc64

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1] wrong packet/byte counters on sparc64"

2004 Sep 09
1
[Bug 36] Possible SMP-race in rule handling (or other memorycorrupting thing)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2004-09-09 01:06 CEST ------- Martin - were you ever able to reproduce this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone
2006 May 11
5
[Bug 474] nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 jan.oravec@6com.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|All |Gentoo Platform|All |sparc64 ------- Additional Comments From jan.oravec@6com.sk
2013 Jan 29
2
[Bug 808] New: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=808 Summary: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] bridge at start up
hi i have gone through the achieves but still could not get my bridge to suvive a reboot . please can anyone help me am using fedora core 2 -----Original message----- From: bridge-request@lists.osdl.org Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:08:06 +0100 To: bridge@lists.osdl.org Subject: Bridge Digest, Vol 17, Issue 25 > Send Bridge mailing list submissions to > bridge@lists.osdl.org > >
2006 Jun 26
5
[Bug 339] Kernel panic on bridged packet
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I
2003 Jun 30
3
[Bug 106] iptables 1.2.5-3 acts differently with different RH Linux kernel versions
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-30 17:12 ------- can you please try to use
2013 May 22
3
[Bug 822] New: iptables shows negative or other bad packet/byte counts
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822 Summary: iptables shows negative or other bad packet/byte counts Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo:
2003 Mar 06
3
[Bug 59] sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
2013 Jun 11
0
[Bug 764] Doing -Z twice in parallel breaks counters
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|
2006 Jun 24
3
[Bug 488] Chain/Groupings of networks don't total pkts and bytes correctly
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=488 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-24 19:10 MET ------- Not
2007 Jan 28
4
[Bug 536] Attempting to remove a non-empty userchain gives poor error message
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET ------- I can reproduce this, but
2004 May 29
0
[Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-05-29 23:45 ------- iptables calls getsockopt() twice, first with SO_GET_INFO which locks the table in kernel and returns some info and then unlocks the table, among that info is the size of the table. Then iptables allocates memory and calls getsockopt() again but
2006 Apr 15
5
[Bug 470] Can't compile kernel with new iptables
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=470 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Severity|blocker |normal ------- Additional Comments From
2003 Jun 22
2
[Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on
2003 Nov 22
1
[Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter-bugzilla@ratty.org.uk 2003-11-22 16:15 ------- I'm seeing the same problem here. We're grabbing byte counts from around 2000 rules with iptables -nvxL from a minutely cron job and occasionally the counts come back as zero or a few packets worth of bytes and then return to
2006 Sep 26
10
[Bug 517] failed to forward packets via some interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=517 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-09-26 03:44 MET ------- *** Bug 519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are
2006 Feb 18
4
[Bug 451] ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-18 19:35 MET ------- Which
2006 May 20
3
[Bug 477] ip_conntrack_ftp.o: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|
2006 Feb 28
9
[Bug 428] Does not work access from the internal netwrok through external address
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=428 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-28 03:22 MET ------- What kernel
2006 Apr 13
3
[Bug 466] u.tcp used where u.udp should be, in tftp nat helper
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=466 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|