similar to: Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-7834 ] infinte_range.rb makes incorrect assumption about to_f

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 25 Oct 2007 14:01 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-15021 ] without or not params matcher To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #15021, was opened at 2007-10-24 15:33 You can respond by visiting:

FYI - I''ve just released Mocha 0.5.6 to make Ruby 1.9 compatibility fixes available for those using released packages rather than subversion trunk. I''m not feeling well and so haven''t been able to test it other than by running all the tests using Ruby 1.9. Please let me know if you have any problems using it. Remember that it sometimes takes a while for a new gem

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 04-Jul-2007 19:21 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported correctly on error To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #12001, was opened at 2007-07-04 15:21 You can respond by visiting:

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 30-Jun-2007 14:33 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-11885 ] never doesn''t work with stub_everything To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #11885, was opened at 2007-06-27 14:13 You can respond by visiting:

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:07 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #6416, was opened at 2006-10-31 15:34 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=6416&group_id=1917

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods. To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29 You can respond by visiting:

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:24 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #5892, was opened at 2006-09-25 07:49 You can respond by visiting:

Hi Kevin, Not currently, I''m afraid - I always realised it was a possible problem, but we haven''t run into it in our use of Mocha so far. I guess you''re pushing the envelope with it, which is great. If you only need to do it for one or two objects, you could just undefine the offending methods. In the meantime I''ll look into a better solution. It may not be

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 7 Sep 2007 22:43 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-13763 ] add with_any_arguments method To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #13763, was opened at 2007-09-07 17:43 You can respond by visiting:

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-5856 ] Stubbing of private methods should be allowed To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #5856, was opened at 2006-09-22 17:03 You can respond by visiting:

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 20 Dec 2007 15:48 Subject: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility To: noreply at rubyforge.org Patches item #16424, was opened at 2007-12-19 02:43 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7479&aid=16424&group_id=1917 Category: None

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:39 Subject: [ mocha-Feature Requests-7119 ] ability to specify call order To: noreply at rubyforge.org Feature Requests item #7119, was opened at 2006-12-06 00:30 You can respond by visiting:

Begin forwarded message: > From: <noreply at rubyforge.org> > Date: 15 June 2007 10:44:07 BDT > To: noreply at rubyforge.org > Subject: [ mocha-Patches-11583 ] Mocha 0.5.0 throwing unexpected > warnings, one line patch included > > Patches item #11583, was opened at 2007-06-14 21:28 > You can respond by visiting: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/? >

In a controller run through webrick I do this: @entity = Entity.new print @entity.methods.sort.to_yaml and I see this: - logger - mark_for_destruction - marked_for_destruction? - metaclass - method - method_missing - methods - new_record? There is no method_exists? method. If I instead do this in a console session, I see this: $ script/console >> >> @entity = Entity.new =>

Basically, I''m trying to crop multiple images out of a remote/original scene.. Think flickr ''tagging'', only, the pixs in the tagged boxes become their own unique images.. by way of simulating an upload from the controller using attachment fu.. can''t quite figure out the specific method in fu that would allow me to do this.. I''m so near the edge right

Lo there all, i have a function that builds a bunch of markers to go on a google map. I would like to update them with rjs. Here is what i have so far. def map_main_layout @zoom = params[:zoom].to_i @zoom = 14 if params[:zoom].nil? @map = GMap.new("map_div") # @map.control_init(:large_map => true, :map_type => true) # (inserts map control) # place

Have in a module in ./lib: module Pricing def sell_price (cost.to_f)/((100-(margn.to_f))/100) end def sell_price_inc ((product.cost.to_f)/((100-(product.margn.to_f))/100)*1.14) end def charge_excl (sell_price).to_f * quantity end end A model product: class Product < ActiveRecord::Base include Pricing attr_accessible :name, :code, :cost, :company_id, :margn

Good day. I have spent almost 2 days on this issue. I have asked everyone from my Rails expert to my Javasript expert and we can not for the life of us figure out the issue with this one form element. I have a form which contains several readonly/disabled (firefox/ie) form elements. ALL elements in the form are updated correctly EXCEPT this one form element. The form element in the view looks as

I just updated an old app from 1.2.6 to 2.0.2 and I''m having an rjs problem. I have one page that has 2 submit to remote buttons, one to do a price override and the other to remove the lineitem. Everything is working perfectly before the update but now the price override doesn''t update the page. I''ve verified that the price_override method still gets called because

Hi i''m using ferret to enable geographical postcode. I take a postcode and distance in miles from the user, strip off the outcode and then retrieve the associated x y coordinates in metres from the db. Then i get two temp x''s and y''s and search for all results that are within the box, see code below. Problems start to occur when i search on big distances so for