James Mead
2007-Dec-20 15:51 UTC
[mocha-developer] Fwd: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 20 Dec 2007 15:48 Subject: [ mocha-Patches-16424 ] Ruby 1.9 Compatibility To: noreply at rubyforge.org Patches item #16424, was opened at 2007-12-19 02:43 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7479&aid=16424&group_id=1917 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Joshua Peek (joshpeek) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Ruby 1.9 Compatibility Initial Comment: Ruby 1.9 Compatibility Tested on * ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [universal-darwin9.0] * ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-11 patchlevel 0) [i686-darwin9.1.0] ---------------------------------------------------------------------->Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead)Date: 2007-12-20 15:48 Message: Thanks for your help. I''ve tested and applied your patch and fixed a few other warnings in revision 206 of trunk. Cheers, James. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7479&aid=16424&group_id=1917 As of revision 206, thanks to Joshua Peek, trunk should be Ruby 1.9 compatible. Please let us know if you run into any problems. I can see some opportunities for simplifying some of the implementation e.g. using the new BasicObject class, but that can wait for now. -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org http://tumble.floehopper.org
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning
- Fwd: [ mocha-Feature Requests-15021 ] without or not params matcher
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases
- Fwd: [ mocha-Patches-11583 ] Mocha 0.5.0 throwing unexpected warnings, one line patch included