James Mead
2007-Apr-11 14:37 UTC
[mocha-developer] Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods. To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=8687&group_id=1917 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Erik Hetzner (egh) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods. Initial Comment: Best explained with an example: test: foo = mock() bar = mock().stubs(:get_baz).returns(:baz) foo.stubs(:with_something).yields(bar) real code: baz = foo.with_something do |bar| bar.get_baz.to_s end baz should now be "baz", but is nil because we have not specified a return value for the stub. Now, we could set add .returns("baz"), but that means that the block isn''t really tested. I have attached a file patches on a yields_and_returns method to Mocha::Expecatation & Mocha::Stub which will return the block''s return value. foo = Mocha::Mock.new bar = Mocha::Mock.new bar.stubs(:get_baz).returns(:baz) foo.stubs(:with_something).yields_and_returns(bar) baz = foo.with_something do |bar| bar.get_baz.to_s end ---------------------------------------------------------------------->Comment By: Erik Hetzner (egh)Date: 2007-04-11 07:31 Message: Hi James, Sorry I wasn''t more clear. I could certainly change my code, but I have existing code that I want to test, & I don''t want to have to change my code so that I can test it. My code uses this with_something idiom & returns the value which the yielded block returns. I can''t test this with Mocha''s yields builder because it does not return the value with is returned by the yield block. The code: baz = foo.with_something do |bar| bar.get_baz.to_s end is real code which I want to test with a mocked foo & bar objects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Mead (jamesmead) Date: 2007-04-11 07:03 Message: Hi Erik, Thanks for the bug report & suggested patch. To be honest I can''t see anything wrong with Mocha''s behaviour in the example you''ve given. It''s not obvious what you are trying to test. Can you not do something like this... def test_me foo = mock() bar = mock() bar.stubs(:get_baz).returns(:baz) foo.stubs(:with_something).yields(bar) baz = nil foo.with_something do |bar| baz = bar.get_baz.to_s end assert_equal ''baz'', baz end (see http://pastie.caboo.se/53041 for syntax highlighted version) ...so I don''t really see the need for the yields_and_returns method you are suggesting. Does that make sense? If not, can you try to explain more fully what exactly it is that you are trying to test, ideally with full code examples. Thanks, James. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=8687&group_id=1917 -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [#8687] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
- Stubbing yielding methods
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-12001 ] Method call count is not reported correctly on error
- Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-5892 ] Using a setup method in test_case_class destroys subsequent test cases