similar to: Which SpanDSP version to play with Asterisk 10 and T.38/T.30 gatewaying ?

2012/1/11, Jos? Pablo M?ndez Soto <auxcri at gmail.com>: > Im using the one that comes with Ubuntu Server 10.10 (0.0.6~pre12-1): > > http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libspandsp&searchon=names&suite=maverick&section=all > > And having a sweet time with T.38 gateway. Oneiric already offers latest > pre18. T.38/T.30 gatewaying can tricky enough to

hi, there is T.38 fax gateway for asterisk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12931 please test it and report bugs for people from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+T.38+Bounty if you still want donate t.38 development please contact me at cervajs at fpf.slu.cz --------------------------------------- Marek Cervenka =======================================

Hello, i just had some fax abortions because of some packet loss. so i startet to examine in the pcap recording from the res_fax_digium, if the T.38 EC mode redundancy was really used. So i watched into it, and compared it with a t.38 pcap from spandsp (same asterisk setup, but with app_fax) and i see differences in t38.error_recovery (error-recovery: secondary-ifp-packets) With spandsp here are

Aloha, We are looking to roll a solution that will have the following network layout: ISDN-PRI <--> Asterisk <--> T.38 <--> ATA <--> Fax Does version 1.8 with the Digium fax driver have this capability? I like 1.8 because it is a long term support version. What ATA's are people using? Any working solutions would be great! Aloha, Matt

Where can I get the latest stable version of spandsp. That will work with res_fax_spandsp.so. The link listed on the voip-info website is dead. Any other location for download? http://www.soft-switch.org/ Thanks Bryant Zimmerman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Morning, Have some questions regarding receiving and sending faxes... 1:st example: exten => 101,1,Answer() exten => 101,2,Wait(3) exten => 101,3,ReceiveFAX(/var/spool/asterisk/tmp/fax.tiff) exten => 101,4,System(tiff2pdf -p A4 /var/spool/asterisk/tmp/fax.tiff > /var/spool/asterisk/tmp/fax.pdf) exten => 101,5,System(mutt -s 'New FAX for you sir' -a

Hi, Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive to compile. Running Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 5. Does anyone have the free/open source executables that you could send me? Thanks for your help! P. S.: TxFax and FaxSend would also be appreciated.

Hi list, I'm running current SpanDSP http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully. Most Fax machines do work but I have problems with people having Tobit FaxWare and Shamrock CapiFax. http://www.tobit.com/login/mrd.asp?CategoryID=120 http://www.shamrock.de/ I've got black bars over the pages. In Tobit some content is Ok,

Hi all, Anyone have an idea which version of spandsp, libunicall, libmfcr2, libsupertone, app_rxfax/app_txfax and chan_unicall I should use for the latest asterisk 1.2? Would that be the ones listed below? http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre4.tgz http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/test-apps-asterisk-1.2/

Hello, i just made the reproducible watching: I send a Fax from asterisk (trunk) with spandsp (latest snapshot) via T.38 -> Audiocodes Mediant 2000 (FW 5.60.43.5) -> PSTN Fax With Internal timing Enabled, the Fax break after the first quarter from the first page is transfered. With Internal timing Disabled, the fax is transferred flawless. Both test with pthread timing module on a QEMU

hi all, any one know, about echo cancellation with digium card, is it actually needed or it okay if we dont purchase because it increase price which half of new card, regards Dhaval -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090827/8d6c680a/attachment.htm

Hi all, There is a test version for the next release of spandsp at ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.2pre2 Only use this if you wish to experiment. In general, using spandsp-0.0.1 is probably more stable right now. If you have had problems with Canon FAX machines not accepting FAXes from spandsp-0.0.1 you might like to try this version. I have had at least one report from

"Security only fixes: 2011-04-21" So in six days, no more bugfix patches will committed into 1.4-branch :( Is a prolongation possible? Because 1.4 is so reliable now. It would be a great loss. And no, 1.8 is not (yet) a replacement. Kristijan

This message is pointed directly to Steve Underwood. I tought it would not be nice to directly email him with a question that interests a good part of the Asterisk community, so here it is. :) Steve, remember a few days ago when we discussed about issues on Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 fax reception? Well I opened an issue on Mantis (https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16756) and turns out it

Hello, short question: is there a possibility to use asterisk as an outbound proxy? iam open for any suggestions, use asterisk trunk, dirty patches, ugly workarounds, everything. What is want to build is: SIP Phone -> via TLS/SRTP -> Asterisk as outbound proxy -> via UDP/RTP -> VoIP-Provider So Asterisk should just forward any incoming SIP messages (INVITE, REGISTER) to the

Receiving a fax pstn - pstn with 1.6.2.6-rc2: -- Executing [s at incoming-pstn-line:1] Answer("DAHDI/4-1", "") in new stack -- Executing [s at incoming-pstn-line:2] Wait("DAHDI/4-1", "3") in new stack -- Executing [s at incoming-pstn-line:3] Dial("DAHDI/4-1", "DAHDI/g0,36") in new stack -- Called g0 --

Hi, I would appreciate some advice on the following: how does one use a single BRI port HFC chipset based ISDN cards with the latest DAHDI, libpri and Asterisk 1.8? For Asterisk 1.4 I would first install mISDN & mISDNuser and then build Asterisk 1.4. Now I noticed that Digium's HFC chipset based B410P is supported by the latest DAHDI & libpri but reading the source of the

Hello, what about: "This feature means you can restart Asterisk after a failure (or asterisk restart itself with safe_asterisk), and keep existing calls up with only a few seconds of audio dropped." That would be a feature! there is a "other" pbx that has this feature... Anyone else would like to see that feature? just want to start some brainstorming, Kristijan

Hello Steve. On 17/05/2005, at 10:54 PM, Steve Underwood wrote: > When a fax is received the header you see is part of the image. As > such, it ends up in the TIFF file as part of the image. It is not > available as text anywhere. The only way to make it available as > text would be to implement OCR. That is complex and messy, and I > have no intention to try. The only

Maybe I over-complicated my question with the mailfax part. If I leave the mailfax step out entirely, then there should be a .tif file, right? But there's not. No tif file gets created at all. Permissions on the fax folder are 777 at the moment. Thanks for the responses so far. /Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: