similar to: net sam setworkstations !logic

Sometime ago had migrated from a PDC (samba3) to an AD (samba4) environment. In the PDC environment setting the allowed workstations for each user was done with the "net sam set workstations" command and could also easily be unset (using "" as the last argument). I now wish to move to a GPO for login control but removing the limitations put in place are no longer working - I

Running into a serious problem here with 3.0.24 + patches. The shop has a mix of domain member computers and privately owned non-domain member computers. I'm trying to use "net sam set workstations" to limit the workstations domain users can log onto. This limitation works as expected. And domain member workstations all work properly. But once the workstation limit is put in

Hello everybody, I am currently trying to set up a Samba PDC with OpenLDAP. I am trying to do this with Ldapsam_Editposix (got it from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix ) instead of the smbldap-tools. I followed the instructions and everything is set fine. I imported the base structure from the given ldif (edited it to my domain), but when I try to let the command "net sam

Dear list, i had some problems with "net sam provision" using samba 3.4.0 I followed the instructions described on http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix and those published by iX 4-6/2008 (www.ix.de) but the result of "net sam provision" was always : # bin/net sam provision Checking for Domain Users group. Adding the Domain Users group. Unable to allocate a new

Not sure if this is best sent to samba or samba-technical. If an admin thinks this is best sent to technical, let me know and I'll resend it there. Hi all, Well I've managed to land myself in a bit of a heap. I've been successfully running Samba4 at two schools I administer as well as my home test network, starting with alpha17 and now on beta8. Group Policy works a charm. But

Hello, we are trying to set up Samba with LDAP Backend. Using the Samba toolchain to add our existing users/groups, the net command seems to get confused about what users and groups are, if both have the same name and are used in the same context. Here is what I tried: ==commandline== -> Create the Domain Group # net sam createdomaingroup duplicate -U Administrator%pwd Created domain group

Hello, I do a Migration from NT4 to Samba + LDAP, I already join Samba to NT4, when I type net rpc vampire -S NT -U Administrator%nt, the following error occur, [2007/12/28 00:13:16, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel(2673) cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel: failed to get schannel session key from server NT for domain SFA.[2007/12/28 00:13:16, 0]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402 Summary: Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: kilburna@iservnetworks.com

In my setup I'm running Samba 3.0.23d-19.2 and CUPS 1.2.7-12.1. Printing from a windows-client works fine, until I instruct CUPS to add a banner-page. The banner-page then is the only thing that gets printed. Doing the same from Linux everything works fine. I get my job including a banner-page. The Windows-printjob is passed raw from Samba to CUPS... Anyone has an idea? Best, Johannes

Hi all, We seem to have some issues with our samba4 ad setup. I posted about this last week already but had received no replies at all so far. :-( What is our situation: two domain controllers (dc1 and dc2), one (separate) fileserver, all running sernet-4.1.7. From the workstations perspective, everything is running as it should, there appear to be no issues. However: something in my

Hi all - sorry for the off-topic posting - just that the list of consultants on the samba site is horrendously out of date! I thought that this would be the best place for me to find suitable resources... firstly I would like to say thanks a million to all the samba team for your ongoing efforts and great product. I just wish I had more time to experiment with it! We have the startings of a good

Hi all When creating unit tests, I wondered whether I should rather use the following... people(:sam).name = "Sammy" people(:sam).city = "Blah" ...or rather the following form: @sam = people(:sam) @sam.name = "Sammy" @sam.city = "Blah" Thanks Josh -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi everyone, I am wondering what is the difference between the content in sam.ldb and sam.ldb.d/DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=LAN. In the two file I have my user entry: # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC\=TRANQUILIT\,DC\=LOCAL.ldb | grep dn | grep CN=dcardon dn: CN=dcardon,CN=Users,DC=tranquilit,DC=local # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb | grep dn | grep CN=dcardon dn:

Samba: 3.0.28a I'm staring at Wireshark output to try to see why one user can read a particular cookie file from one machine, but the same user cannot read it from a different machine. I see: SMB_NETLOGON SAM LOGON request from client SMB_NETLOGON SAM Response - user unknown The detail of the exchange is below. The user name provided appears to be blank. So this may not be a

hi, we want to replace our nt4 pdc/bdc with samba and we use windows nt4 terminal servers with citrix in our environment. as far as i know, we will get a problem here. (extensiver reading of the mailing list led me to this conclusion) regarding: http://ma.ph-freiburg.de/tng/tng-users/2001-05/msg00224.html >Terminal Server has its own User Manager (which has an extra button -

Hi, We have suddenly noticed a difference between our dc's. The file called /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/sam.ldb is only present on 1 of our three dc's. The AD seems to be in healthy state, but...isn't this a bit strange? root at dc3:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d# ls -l sam.ldb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53248 Sep 2 17:31 sam.ldb root at dc3:/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d#

Hi, First of all, The problem i am having is not directly related to Samba. So apologies, however there are a lot of people on this list who know a good deal about how windows (and related technologies) work so i'm hoping they can shed some light on the matter. Background : I successfully completed a migration from a Windows NT4 Domain to s Samba domain with LDAP backend about 2 months.

In the last 4 years of using SAM-FS/QFS I have fallen in love with this product. I have tried earlier to ask Sun to incorporate features into this product but in vain. Do you think the following is worth exploring and in-corporating: 1. Unlike ZFS SAM-FS/QFS File system need "compression" feature turned on with ''setfa''. I understand that''s a whole lot of

We stopped the migration, because we had to many problems. For your information: The windows-domain was set up in 2002 with windows 2000 and was raised up to windows 2012 over the years. The domain is responsible for the login of all 20.000 students. So over the years they have over 170.000 Objects. For the migration we used the 4.11 sernet-packages. We started with 32GB of RAM and noticed that

I've got a HP Envy laptop and I'm fairly happy with it. The internal WiFi doesn't work with Centos but a ?5 WiFi dongle sorted that. Oddly, it still stops working once the battery drops below 50% ish. Mine is dual boot with Win8 which is pants. The biggest problem is that whenever I do much with the config, e.g. when I re-installed centos, the boot loader doesn't sort properly