similar to: Newbie: Directory Not Accessible

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Deryck, Should we create a list of LDAP management tools that support the Samba schema? For example, LAM & phpLdapAdmin. http://lam.sf.net/ http://phpldapadmin.sf.net/ cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I've been working on SWAT in trunk for the last few weeks. My work started as nothing more than a cosmetic redesign, trying to modernize SWAT and offer a clean, sophisticated interface. As I've gotten deeper into this, it seems to me that SWAT could use some improvements to its overall design -- not just aesthetically, but

Dear Sirs, I cannot find how to check out samba-docs according to docs/README-NOW: ATTENTION DOCS TREE REMOVED --------------------------------------------------- This docs tree has been moved to a separate SVN module on svn.samba.org name 'samba-docs'. See http://svnanon.samba.org/ for details on accessing Samba svn trees. Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine

Dear Folks, For a long time I have been unable to read the menu at the left of http://samba.org/ in my 1920x1440 display. All the menu items overwrite each other in a horrible, illegible jumble. I thought it might be a bug in firefox or something. Then I investigated, and found that there is actually a serious bug in the cascading style sheet for the web site. The problem is in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, Just a heads up for everyone. We are aware of the problem and are continuing to work on resolving it. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man

What's the trick to use testparm to clean up your smb.conf file?

Hello, I'm new at linux and i appreciated is somebody could help me. I have installed the latest version af SAMBA on a Cobalt RAQ550. The SNMB and the NMBD daemons are running. However, when I want to access the swat pages http://192.168.5.240:901 <http://192.168.5.240:901/> There is noting found. Regards, Peter Discart

I'm looking at having my general Samba users change their own passwords on my Linux server using SWAT. Is there a way that I can have them have access to the password changing view and not be able to see the configuration and status information. Is there an easy way for those "button" to not appear on the web page? Roy Costa roycosta at us.ibm.com

Can anyone point me to a search interface for this lists archive. I couldn't find reference on the lists.samba.org site. Thanks, r.b. Robert W. Burgholzer Online Workout Editor - http://soulswimmer.dynalias.net:8080/swim/workoutlog/ rburghol at veetee dot edu

Curious what folks think the best choice of filesystem is, specifically when used for Samba and regular Unix users (SMB+NFS access). I'm using Reiser now but its slow and doesn't work good XP attributes. I've also used XFS (a couple of years ago) and liked it but had some troubles with cross-platform Unix and the extended ACLs. What's the preference today? Thanks -- Eric A.

I have activated the audit.so module and it logs information about file access but not in the format I want: it doesn't log the user name and host name who performed each action on a file or directory. How can I set the format of this log? About the recycle.so module, it works but not always. Some "Permission denied" lines appear in the logs regarding a file move towards .recycle.

If you haven't been to samba.org in the last few hours, it's time to take a look. Much has changed. The Samba website has been completely redesigned and updated. This version of the Samba website has a striking new look and features XHTML markup and a CSS-controlled layout. In addition to these changes to samba.org, the Samba Team is pleased to announce the creation of news.samba.org,

Hi, I'm setting up Samba on a RH ES linux machine. I have basic functionality working and can access a share from a Windows pc. I set up smb.conf manually. I'd like to use SWAT but when I try to run it I get the error: -- The connection was refused when attempting to contact localhost:901 -- I set up the xinetd configuration file exactly as I've seen online. Webmin works fine.

I'm curious about how one would go about contacting/hiring a samba developer to fix a bug, or implement a feature. I've got a particular bug in mind (1493), but it seems like it would be a good thing to know in general. Thanks, Mark Roach

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Update on server upgrade: Thanks to Lars M?ller and Deryck Hodge, the server upgrades are complete. Everything should be back to normal at * bugzilla.samba.org * viewcvs.samba.org * people.samba.org * projects.samba.org * wiki.samba.org * news.samba.org Please report any problems that you may notice due to the upgrades to

http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/SambaIntro.html Through his E'mail contacts, Andrew discovered that NetBIOS and SMB were actually (though nominally) documented. With this new information at his fingertips he set to work again, but soon ran into another problem. He was contacted by a company claiming trademark on the name that he had chosen for his server software. Rather than cause a fuss,

I see a ton of past archive mails for pam_mkhomedir.so, but I don't see anyone else with my problem. Do others just not care that a bunch of extra folders with the machine names are getting created, or is it not happening for anyone else, and I have just done something wrong? RHEL 3.04 samba 2.0.14a-1 Barry Smoke Network Administrator AR Division of Leg. Audit -----Original

Luke Leighton (lkcl) has brought up his arguments about control of Samba before. In October 2000 they resulted in the creation of a new Samba code branch, samba-tng, which Luke and others who agreed with his direction were free to do with as they will. Samba-tng still exists, and we in the Samba Team still wish it well, but what we can't continue to put up with is Luke still rehashing the

For whatever reason, patches posted to the Phabricator website still aren't being sent to the mailing list, making it difficult for us to review them. I've raised this issue a couple of times in the last few weeks. In practice this has a detrimental effect to the development workflow because it means that code is being seen only by a small group of individuals who have web accounts.

i am creating call files, and catching successfully the ones that don't connect in a 'failed' extension. can anyone tell me how to find out the reason for the failure (ie busy, no answer). ${DIALSTATUS} doesn't appear to get set (presumably because Dial() isn't used) and channel_status doesn't seem to be any good. thanks in advance. -- - Rich Doughty