similar to: Samba Solaris HIGH Cpu

I have about 5000 distinct shares defined in my smb.conf file. As you can imagine it's quite large. Everyone once in awhile all the smbd daemons ( in top ) go to a run state and pretty much bring the system to a halt. The system is WAY oversized. 99.999% of the day samba runs fine. We _THINK_ we've narrowed down the times when the smbd processes go crazy to a time when we're

Received the following messages ( scrolling ) in the log.smbd: users could not access the samba server. had to stop the samba daemons. ran a ps -ef | grep smb found many smbd processes running. had to pkill the process, and then re-start samba to make the shares available. Running 3.012 Can't find anything anywhere. Any help would be appreciated. [2005/04/26 16:02:21, 0]

We've got a large user base. They all have a home directory and within it a public_html directory. Each of the directories have and need different permissions set on them. I've tried using ACL's, setgid bits, all the samba options, however when a file is _MOVED_ from their home directory to their public_html directory the permissions don't change. Even with the different

I'm currently running samba 3.0.20a I can configure and make 3.0.20a with no problem I run the same configure command on the 3.0.24 source, configure works fine, but make returns the following. ( and just to test if a patch screwed me up I tested configuring and making the 3.0.20a version again, and it worked as it should ) Any bugs with 3.0.24??? Using FLAGS = -O -D_SAMBA_BUILD_

Hai, Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-) And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date. So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Benedikt Kale? via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37

Hi Martin, > Does a useful ps command (e.g. ps auxww) show smbd running? What do > the smbd logs say? no, root at ctdb-<HOST>:~# ps auxwww | grep smbd root     13192  0.0  0.0  12780   940 pts/0    S+   13:05   0:00 grep smbd There is no smbd, nmbd is running. Ahh, but the log says: [2019/05/16 11:26:38.702593,  0] ../source3/smbd/server.c:1519(smbd_claim_version)  

Dear all, I use the Sernet Samba packages in version 4.9.3. I try to do an online-backup of my domain by: samba-tool domain backup online --server=ad2 --targetdir=/root -Uadministrator and I get the following error: Committing SAM database Setting isSynchronized and dsServiceName Cloned domain DOMAIN (SID S-1-5-21-1996849263-3223042488-349429296) ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception -

Hi Tim, What we did: setting "log level = 10" in smb.conf then exdcute the following command: ------ samba-tool domain backup online --server=addc3 --targetdir=/root -k yes >backup.txt 2>&1 ------ Then we grep for the message with "call_nt_transact_query_security_desc" ------ grep call_nt_transact_query_security_desc backup.txt ------ And got nothing :-( still the

Hi again, regarding my post "plenty of vacuuuming process" a "gluster volume heal" seems to improve the situation. But I still have a strange problem: Sometimes a user don't have permissions to? a restricted folder when h connects to a share or logs in at a windows client. In some times all permissions are granted. If the user creates a file, the user and group is

Hi, I have a ctdb cluster with 3 nodes and 3 glusterfs (version 6) nodes up and running. I observe plenty of these situations: A connected Windows-10 client doesn't react anymore. I use forder redirections.? - Smbstatus shows up some (auth in progress) processes. - In the logs of a ctdb node I get: Aug 23 10:12:29 ctdb-1 ctdbd[2167]: Ending traverse on DB locking.tdb (id 568831), records

Hi, sorry to bother you: I have three AD in the domain. They all deliver different IDs: root at addc2:~# id testuser uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~$ id testuser uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users)

We are seeing the SMBD process sitting at 99.9% Are there any step-by-step troubleshooting guides to track the source of the problem? -Jeremy

Hi Denis, thanks a lot! > you said that the zone is empty. It is not a problem per se but for some > time Bind-DLZ has been a bit more strict and ask for a NS record for > every zone. So you just have to create a NS field in your zone pointing > to one of your DC and you should be fine. Internal DNS does not have > this requirements. > > samba-tool dns mydc

Hi, yes, I did. I get the same results with "getent passwd testuser" on each node. /etc/ctdb/nodes and /etc/ctdb/public_addresses is exactly the same on each node On each node sernet-samba/stretch,now 99:4.9.12-15 amd64 is installed Yes, I read the documentation. It is strange, that another cluster in another office configured that way is working perfect ;( The load is not as high

Hi, Oh sorry, of course: The running os is debian 9.9 and I'm running the sernet-samba-ctdb in version 4.9.11-15 This is my configuration: [global] ??? winbind refresh tickets = Yes ??? winbind use default domain = yes ??? template shell = /bin/bash ??? idmap config * : range = 1000000 - 1999999 ??? idmap config ZFD : backend = rid ??? idmap config ZFD : range = 0 - 200000 ??? hide dot

Hello list, how could this happen? The Server doesn't respond from time to time with a high load avarage. We found a suspicious smbd process: top - 13:43:07 up 1 day, 2:27, 5 users, load average: 32.49, 58.41, 37.95 Tasks: 1196 total, 5 running, 1190 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu0 : 14.7% us, 3.8% sy, 0.0% ni, 79.8% id, 1.3% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.3% si Cpu1 : 1.3% us, 84.6%

Dear Jeremy, thanks for your reply. I assume I load the the debug symbols by passing something in the [global] section? I now changed back to a fuse_mount to get my colleagues back to work again. Tomorrow at 17 CEST I can add a test share with vfs_glusterfs to test it. Best Bene Am 09.11.20 um 17:55 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 04:01:47PM +0100, Benedikt Kale? via

Hi, thanks for your hints! Am 10.01.19 um 03:46 schrieb Tim Beale via samba: > - As a sanity-check, you could run 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck' > locally on your DC. It may tell you if there's an ACL problem. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck doesn't show any problems. > - Instead of an online backup, try running 'samba-tool domain backup > offline' locally on

I'm using a Snom 320 in a CAP position and the receptionist wants to do blind transfers. OK, no problem so far. Now she has asked me how to UN-transfer a call, as in, she transfers a call and wants to hook the call back before it connects (she wanted to tell the caller additional information for example) I don't think that this is possible as once my dialplan starts using Dial()

Dear list, in this corona crisis a delivery of a AD to a location abroad takes longer than I expected. I demoted the AD which is in delivery with samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=ADDC3 If I know trigger a samba-tool drs showrepl I still see him in the list: CN=Configuration,DC=example,DC=com ??? NTDS DN: CN=NTDS