similar to: help

Dear samba team: This is the first time I use samba. I want to install it on Solaris but I don=A1=AFt know which release of samba is fit for our workstation. So I hope I can get more and fast information from you. The details of our workstation is following: Workstation Type: SUNW, Ultra-5_10; sparc; sun4u OS: SunOS release 5.8 Generic_108528-01 =20

Hello all, I am trying to make one of my solaris server member of our w2k3 ads domain. ldap and kerberos packages are installed. * when I try to get a ticket granting ticket, no problem ... kinit klist are all running fine .. below my krb5 config file # cat /etc/krb5/krb5.conf [logging] kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5/krb5kdc.log # admin_server = FILE:/var/log/krb5/kadmind.log default =

Dear All, 1. why did the problem happen? 2. How to solve it? -- Best wishes, Zhijiang Wang -------------------------------------------- PHD Student Room 212, Science buliding, The International WIC Institute, College of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.

Totally understood. If you remain "on vacation" (we wish eh?!) and get further messages like that from the list s'ware, just accept my standing apologies and delete them. Very welcome re letter! Very best, Chris ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Send reply to: "Alana O'C" <alanaoc at internode.on.net> From: "Alana O'C"

Hello, We are having issues with a NEW Sangoma A108D: -- Executing [691918892 at pbx1:1] Dial("SIP/xtravoip200-009d24b0", "DAHDI/g0/691918892|30|m") in new stack [Oct 1 10:04:43] WARNING[14171]: channel.c:3170 ast_request: No translator path exists for channel type DAHDI (native 76) to 256 [Oct 1 10:04:43] WARNING[14171]: app_dial.c:1237 dial_exec_full: Unable to create

Are there known performance issues with using glusterfs on software raid? I've been playing with a variety of configs (AFR, AFR with Unify) on a two server setup. Everything seems to work well, but performance (creating files, reading files, appending to files) is very slow. Using the same configs on two non-software raid machines shows significant performance increases. Before I go a

Hi, I'm using Sangoma's wanpipe together with dahdi, all software downloaded today at most recent version. Hardware is Sangoma A104, a 4xE1 card. Installation went well. Anyway, wanrouter status shows a different result than dahdi_tool or dahdi_scan. I've just put a hardware loop on port 1. All the other ports are open. wanrouter status shows the expected result: Device name |

Hello, I am apparently confused about the use of an id parameter for an event history/survival model, and why the EHA documentation for aftreg does not specify one. All assistance and insights are appreciated. Attempting to specifiy an id variable with the documentation example generates an "overlapping intervals" error, so I sorted the original mort dataframe and set subsequent entry

Hi everyone, I am reading through Sangoma Wiki right now. But someone may already and quickly notice this. I have a system that is down since the morning (maybe power intruptions). All seems fine except for "wanrouter status" shows disconnected. Following are the alarms raised. Should I call telco (they have long wait times) or should I just keep searching online for troubleshooting

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: > From: Aft nix <aftnix at gmail.com> > >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:53 PM, John Doe <jdmls at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> ?From: Aft nix <aftnix at gmail.com> >>> >>>> ?I'm developing some kernel module, so i need a stand alone qemu to >>>> ?test my

Hello, I have following problem with Sangoma A104 card: CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7 Sentrej: 0 SolicitFbit: 0 Retrans: 0 Busy: 0 Overlap Dial: 0 T200 Timer: 1000 T203 Timer: 10000 T305 Timer: 30000 T308 Timer: 4000 T313 Timer: 4000 N200 Counter: 3 NOTICE[16509]: chan_zap.c:7494 pri_dchannel: PRI

Hi to all, I am working on design package using survival function. First using PSM and adopting a weibull specification for the baseline hazard , I have got the following results(since weibull has both PH and AFT propreties ,in addition I have used the PPHSm command): Value Std. Error z p (Intercept) 1.768 1.0007 1.77 7.73e-02 SIZE -0.707 0.0895 -7.90 2.80e-15

Hi all, I want to apply lasso method in AFT model. can anybody help me how to get lasso estimate using AFT model. Hossain [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I am trying to run Weibull PH model in R. Assume in the data set I have x1 a continuous variable and x2 a categorical variable with two classes (0= sick and 1= healthy). I fit the model in the following way. Test=survreg(Surv(time,cens)~ x1+x2,dist="weibull") My questions are 1. Is it Weibull PH model or Weibull AFT model? Call: survreg(formula = Surv(time, delta) ~ x1

Hi, In the package survival, using the function survreg for AFT model, I only see 4 distributions for the response y: weibull, gaussian, logistic, lognormal and log-logistic, which correspond to certain distributions for the error terms. I'm wondering if there is a package or how to obtain the parameter estimates (the beta's are of great interest) from the AFT model (maximizing

Hello, I'm working with some left censored survival data using accelerated failure time models. I am interested in fitting different distributions to the data but seem to be getting the same results from the model fit using survreg regardless of the assumed distribution. These two codes seem to provide the same results: aft.gaussian <-

I'm not understand "lookup.c" in the "lib". Can you explain it in detail for me?

Hi, I'm estimating a loglogistic aft (accelerated failure time) model, just a simple plain vanilla one (without time dependent covariates), I'm comparing the results that I obtain between aftreg (eha package) and survreg(surv package). If I don't use any covariate the results are identical , if I add covariates all the coefficients are the same until a precision of 10^4 or 10^-5 except

I've replaced 2XTE110 with an A102 with echo cancellation specifically to deal with echo problems. However, user feedback has indicated to me that on some calls (not a lot, but some) the call is unusable, with audio artifiacts, described by one user, as: "very bad phasing reverb & feedback (from my rock & roll days)". This is quite intermittent, as in most cases, the user

Hi All, I have just latest branch of asterisk 1.8 and i didn't found dahdi command in CLI everything seem fine. am i missing something ? campbx2*CLI> dahdi <tab tab> No such command 'dahdi' (type 'core show help dahdi' for other possible commands) campbx2*CLI> root at campbx1:/etc/wanpipe# wanrouter hwprobe ------------------------------- | Wanpipe Hardware