similar to: Segfaults in Debian?

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:54:12PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:15:47PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Ok, then, you *must* build debugging-enabled packages by running... :) > > > > The binaries are compiled with debugging turned on -- the debugging > > symbols are stripped out for packaging. > > Package: samba > Version:

I upgrade from 2.2.3 -> 2.2.7a using the debian packages. Now, i have a big problem. Mapping drive: Ok Accessing the drive: Ok Trying to access a folder a popup emerges saying saying silo-1 on 'cookiemonster' (S:) S:\data is not accessible. Incorrect function. OK i see no errors in the logs, and am really stumped... reading a _file_ in the share works as expected tho. Creating a

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks

Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >

Hi all, I''ve just finished the last major work before a new release (0.23.0). I''ve got my next work planned out, and I want to get this code, with its bug-fixes et al, released. There have been significant internal changes, so I would really appreciate it if people could test it against their systems, especially those who are using non-{Debian,OS X} platforms, like

Dear All, I think I've hit a bug after migrating our mail server to the newest version of dovecot (version 2.2.15). When I try to list all imap folders for one user the imap process crashes. The listing to a specific folder (ex. INBOX) works fine, only the "*" crashes. Client side: --------------------- [root at mb log]# telnet 127.0.0.1 143 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to

My housemate has formalized a sortof new attack against unix-style operating systems. He''s a BSD fan, so that''s where he developed the attack. He asked me to check Linux, which I did. It seems Linux is not vulnerable to it. This attack is going out to BUGTRAQ tonight. The attack isn''t too serious because it requires physical access to the console, but it

Linux libc5.4.33''s mk[s]temp() functions require 6 X''s at the end of a filename (the BSD versions I''ve seen are a bit more flexible). This alone is enough to break any claims to real BSD compatability, but wait, there''s more: Only 1 of those 6 X''s are really unique. The rest are simply pid. So you can create exactly 62 temp files using mk[s]temp()

I was playing around again with Windows and when you add members to silos, or remove them, it should not set/unset assigned silo on the user. So I've got a new pull request in Draft state still where I remove that functionality, as well as add some new commands to samba-tool user command. It turned out to be easier to add sub commands to user, as edit user wasn't quite what I thought

Hi all, This just keeps coming up, again and again, so I decided to take a few hours and break everyone''s configuration. Oh, wait, just kidding. :) Really, I''ve completely rewritten external node support. Here''s the changelog entry: Only ONE node source can be used -- you can use LDAP, code, or an external node program, but not more than one.

Trying to learn Puppet, given a cfengine background. Am trying to understand the Puppet way of accomplishing the following: I have a lot of servers, that are organized into clusters (we call them silos). Each silo has a specific set of parameters (like IP addresses). I''d like to organize the silo information in some way that each server is associated with that information, and can

Hi everyone, I'm trying to print a table justified to the left, but it doesn't work. Any hints? KennArt <- data.frame(NR=c(171,172,174,175,176,177,181,411,980), TYP=c("K?rnermais", ?"Corn Cob Mix", "Zuckermais", "Mischanbau (Silo)Mais/Sonnenblumen", ?"Mais mit Bejagungsschneise in gutem landwirtschaftlichen und ?kologischen Zustand",

Hello all. Now I aleady installed the Asterisk. I could make communication between 2 XLite client through Asterisk. I tryed to test the voicemail function as follow. 1, I make a call to 1001 from 1002 2, Start ringing 3, Wait untill time out for ringing If no problem, 1001 go to voicemail and unavailable message will be played. But 1001 receive a 403 forbidden massage and connection go

Hello everyone, We've been running Samba for years, and with the exception of IDMAP, we've been very happy. Well, now we have a real need to keep this information in a shared DB, so I'm trying to set up the idmap_ldap plugin. I *think* I have lookups working correctly-- at least, I can see that Samba is contacting the LDAP directory. But since there's nothing actually

Hi all: I am trying to transfer a file from a machine A to a machine B. I ran a rsync deamon on machine B at a given port. Because there is a firewall between these two machines, I opened the port on the firewall. Is this enough to get rsync work through firewall? When I tried the transfer, I got the following error messages. my command: rsync -a --copy-links localfile rsync:://me@<my

I found that scoped_access does not re-evaluate the filters on every run. If you are filtering access based on parameters, this can be bad. The scope is set on the first request and then further requests use the last generated scoping. The initial part of ScopedAccess::Filter#before looks like this: @scoping = controller.instance_eval(@scoping.to_s) if @scoping.is_a?(Symbol) This makes

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

Just wanted to note that you also need "mount" => 2.11 to use "auto" in fstab. On the homepage http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ it only tells you to use "util-linux" => 2.11 Also, a note about SILO not working with unclean Ext3 would be nice (i.e. make a dedicated ext2 /boot partition if you want to run ext3 on Sparc). /Martin (very new to this list)