similar to: Supporting multiple clients -- per machine/os config?

I've been using nut with a serial device for a while, but today I tried hooking up this new CyberPower 685 unit via newhidups--since it seemed better supported over USB than serial, based on reading the list archives and cvs logs. Unfortunately, I can't connect to it. My system sees the device: uhid1: CPS UPS BF700, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2, iclass 3/0 ... and I have chmodded all

I'm trying samba-2.0.3 and can't make the passwd sync chat work. Here is the debug Invoking '/usr/bin/passwd papa' as password change program. [2000/03/04 21:58:22, 100] smbd/chgpasswd.c:talktochild(263) talktochild: chatbuf=[*] responsebuf=[Changing password for user papa New UNIX password: ] [2000/03/04 21:58:22, 100] smbd/chgpasswd.c:talktochild(276) talktochild:

I have been trying for hours to get the unix password sync going properly with Samba 1.9.18p4 running on FreeBSD 2.2.5 I have compiled Samba with the ALLOW_CHANGE_PASSWORD option enabled. I created the smbpasswd file as ENCRYPTION.txt states, and can set passwords as root. However, when a user tries changing their password, it doesn't work. The error reported is:

Hi, in the last weeks I've unsuccessfully tried to get Samba (2.0.5a) - Unix (Suse 6.2) password sync working. Maybe somebody can give me a hint, what's wrong. Enclosed you'll find additional information. Thank you for helping, Johannes -------- smb.conf: passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *Password* -------- password chat (manually): homer:~ # /bin/passwd web New

Hello! I'm trying to use unix password sync = true on an Intel-RedHat 5.1 samba server, because I want to have one program (e.g. smbpasswd on the unix comand prompt) to change unix and "encrypted samba" passwords; changing passwords from clients is nice but secondary. I used FLAGSM = -DLINUX -DALLOW_CHANGE_PASSWORD -DFAST_SHARE_MODES -DNO_ASMSIGNALH -DGLIBC2 -DQUOTAS LIBSM =

I am having problems setting up the smbpasswd command to sync the /etc/passwd and $SAMBAHOME/private/smbasswd files. My passwd program (/usr/bin/passwd %u) doesn't seem to want to wait around for smbpasswd to send it a second password for confirmation. I am running Solaris 2.5.1 (103640-23) on an Ultra 2300 and using Samba 1.9.18p10 compiled with gcc 2.8.1. I thought that I had this running

I'm trying to figure out how I can change to SMB password and UNIX password together. On the Win98 I change the password via : Control Panel - Passwords - Change Windows password (select also Microsoft Networking) After a few seconds I get the message 'The password you typed is not correct for MS Networking' Are there any known problems with password sync ? I read the digest 2112 till

Hi! I know this is about the most asked question on these lists. I've been searching the archives looking for an answer, but all I can find is the same question over and over... I'm trying to get the Unix Password Sync option to work on my server. I'm running RH 6.0, with MD5 and shadowed passwords enabled, and Samba 2.0.5a (the RPM version). When I try to change passwords using

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

dear friend. i have mips board with BCM sibyte 1125CPU(use board sibyte 1250 swarm.) i use linux-kernel 2.6.12-rc1 download from linux-mips.com i use kernel 2.4.26 before this time, it's work ok at 2.4.26 with Ramdisk-busybox when i try to use ramdisk in 2.6.1x version, i found that ramdisk i not exist, i don't known how to use it again(i had try a patch for get ramdisk init to

Yamaban wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:00, m.roth at ... wrote: > >> We've started having a problem with a CentOS 7 server. It looses its >> IPv6 address, if I understand this issue correctly. We can get in, >> if we do ssh -4, though. >> >> In the logs, I'm seeing this about twice an hour: >> <warn> (pid 98466) unhandled DHCP event for

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet

i am assigned a network to replace its "Windows server with ISA caching proxy" with another "debian linux with squid proxy" with both "linux" and "ISA" are completely differnet boxes. i am using linux 2.6 kernel since the linux server has SATA hard disks . the network has downlink with a penta@net DVB card for down-link ; then it''s connected

Hi all, we have a very large customer (90'000 PCs) worldwide that has problems with a Samba server. Here are the details : platform : IBM 4-cpu server runing AIX 4.3 Samba : 2.2.7a compiled with gcc 2.95.3 clients : about 100-200, worldwide network : ATM, at least for the server (I don't have more details, sorry) samba config : pretty straightforward, security=server (might be

Mostly out of curiosity: I've seen people advising that we set SO_{RCV,SND}BUF to 8192 as an optimization. I added a call to getsockopt() to grab the old (default) value before setting it to the new, and it turns out (on DG/UX), that the default value is 8760 (or 8704, when you throw in the fact that packets are travelling between different sublans), so the 8192 "optimization" is a

Dear Steve and *.* e1r2 developers and users, now MFCR2 is successfully installed! many thanks for your help. I'm living in Argelia. I have configure my MFCR2 according argentina R2 settigs. (look at the end of the message) the testcall run perfectly (only warnings and I think that is just debug). but I have many problems and when I run Asterisk-MFCR2, generally in the begging no errors