similar to: Samba BDC in a subnet of a Windows NT4.0 domain?

Hey gang, I just joined the list but I've read back a few months and so far noone has mentioned this so I thought I'd drop a line on it. I haven't tried this yet, I have to get back to work to do so but. I think there is an easier way to disable signorseal then to apply the path. Microsnot addresses the issue in the following KB article.

Dear All, I've seen the PRINTER_DRIVER.txt doc on getting the PRINTER$ share set up to automatically add printer drivers to Win95 clients. It explicitly says that the procedure described does not work for NT4.0 clients. I can't find any other documentation on setting up a PRINTER$ share suitable for NT4.0 or NT2000 clients either in the distribution (2.0.5a) or the web site. Is this

I am seeing an odd behavior with NT4.0 SP3 workstations trying to rename files on Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on SunOS 4.1.3 servers. Rename, whether it is run from Explorer, winfile.exe, or command prompt fails with "Access Denied I don't see the problem from Win95 PCs at all, and I don't have the problem with shares from Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on Solaris 2.5.1 servers using identical

Dear List, When we copy an ascii file from SunSolaris Samba server to NT4.0 workstation, the file is getting control characters at the end of each line. Appreciate, if any clue given to solve this problem. Regards.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with a problem whereby 3 NT4.0 + Sservice Pack 3 servers frequently log (in their event lists) that the browsing service cannot get the list of domain resources (the reply to NetServerEnum2) from the master browser (when the boxes are functioning as backup browsers). The situation is :- . NT machines browsing on both NetBUEI and NetBT

Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems? Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it as a replace of samba-1.9.18p8. The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me. 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse the share names of Japanese SJIS, but now I couldn't access the shares because

Actually i should rephrase that. Samba works fine, but what do I put down as `valid users'? certainly I can't use %U like with the template homedir. Any suggestions? Tia, Cheers, -brian -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Brian Reichholf [mailto:brian.reichholf@login.co.at] Gesendet: 15 September 2003 07:32 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Samab and a NT4.0 PDC I've

--- Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > From: Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk> > I've got an NT4.0 domain that I'm planning to > upgrade > to Active Directory. > I've got a couple of Samba member servers in the > domain, various versions above 3.0. > > So I have two questions: > > 1. Are there any gotchas with this scenario or

szcathay@public.szonline.net wrote: > > Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems? > > Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it > as > a replace of samba-1.9.18p8. > The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me. > 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse > the

Hi everyone, Here is my problem: All NT4.0 machines accessing a samba share located on a Solaris 2.6 server (running smbd version 2.0.4b) see the file sizes to be MUCH (terabytes) larger than they actually are. This is true both when looking through Explorer (file manager) and through MS-DOS prompt. On Windows98 machines the files are irrationally large via Explorer, but are the correct size

Hi, I've got an NT4.0 domain that I'm planning to upgrade to Active Directory. I've got a couple of Samba member servers in the domain, various versions above 3.0. So I have two questions: 1. Are there any gotchas with this scenario or will the Samba clients just keep working as NT4-esque clients. 2. Is it possible to "upgrade" a Samba member server to be an Active

Dear R community, I have spent a lot of time with the windows() driver in R 90.0 on NT4.0. There are a few odd behaviors I can't figure out, and wonder if they are bugs, or "features" that I can't find documented: 1. I am mostly doing scatterplots. If I resize the R window, or resize the graphics window except with the resize button, the printed image shows 1-pixel sized dots

Hi, I am running Linux on RedHat 5.0 and Samba 1.9.18p2 to wish to connect to an NT 4.0 server running NT LAN Manager 4.0. I have gone through the documentation and can still not get smbmount nor smbclient to work. I cannot get smbclient -L to give me a listing of the shares on the server. I DO get a browser list, but no shares. I only have partial access to the server and must go thru the

I have a Samba 3.0.22 server running as security = user encrypt passwords = no and WinNT 4.0 service pack 6 with plain text password. WinNT4 client can't connet to Samba 3.0.22 server: [2006/06/13 10:26:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(579) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2006/06/13 10:27:00, 5] auth/auth.c:make_auth_context_subsystem(489) Making default auth method list for

Hi, I have: - Linux 2.0.30 - NT 4.0 - Samba 9.16pl11 - same user name and password on Linux and NT 4.0 (user1, pwxxx) and the smb.conf of below. When I create a file on the samba share [tmp] from the NT 4.0 machine, the owner is always 'nobody' (my guest account). I can not manage it to give it my own name (user1). I can not create a file in another directory neither, because samba

Thanks to all for a wonderful package. It's sharing fine from my Debian box but smbclient isn't working the other way round. Here's the detail: I have three machines together: an NT4 Workstation (sp3), a Win95 machine and a Debian (Hamm = latest stable release). The NT 4 machine has a shared drive I want to access from my Debian machine. I can access that share from the win95

Has anyone here managed to send files from a mobile phone to a CentOS system via Bluetooth? I'm trying with a Samsung E1310, using the GNOME tools, but can't get it to work. I can send files from the Linux box to this phone using the Nautilus bluetooth plugin (nautilus-sendto-bluetooth), and have also managed to "pull" some data I've been trying to send, via

Hello, I'm new to this list. The NT folk here, are concerned about some timeout errors and stuff that appear in their event viewer. They are building a case to convince management that unless these "samba" errors are fixed, we should move to NT file shares. I think this is a bad idea. Can anyone help me out here. We are running samba 2.0.6 (1st msg) and 2.0.5a (2nd err msg)

Hi All, When I copied one file from NT4.0 to Linux through samba with 'copy' command in NT4.0, the file was always corrupted. Size of the file copied into Linux was always about 4G. If I copied it through Windows Explorer, it was OK. It seems samba cannot process the "Write Raw" request sent by 'copy' command correctly when file size is larger than 4G bytes. Thanks

Hi Samba-gurus, I have a problem with samba 2.0.0beta4 on solaris 2.5.1 (samba 1.9.18p10 behaves the same) : 1. I have a ordinary text-file on a samba-share (foo.txt). NT4.0 sees the samba-share (\\sun100\tmp) as a netdrive with the letter K:. I've done a 'net use k: \\sun100\tmp'. 2. I can doubleclick in NT4.0-explorer on foo.txt and notepad comes up correctly. 3. I