similar to: Problems switching from a samba 2.2.2 pdc to 2.2.7 pdc

I have been using Samba w/out any problems what so ever for the longest time, but today, I cannot connect to the linux box (shows up in network neighborhood as 'LINUXSERVER'), but when I try to connect from a win2K machine (which normally connects w/NO problems). Here is the output from /var/log/messages (appears the problem is in smbd) May 23 11:34:14 fileserver nmbd[1423]: [2002/05/23

It seems that my smbd process got fuxed somehow. It appears to have take up all the file handles, and there were over 130 smbd processes running on the system. I'm not entirely sure what happened. My first thought is that something bad happened between the server and the Windows client that's running Kaza (with a couple hundred mid-download files) and it just spiraled out of control,

Hi guys, I'm been following samba for six or seven odd months now in preparation for moving our organisation over to a file server which is a little more cost effective than the Micro$oft alternative. We are currently running with about 30 users on a Windows 2000 Small Business Server. Do you see any problems in replacing this server with a linux box running Samba? Is the file

This is probably a hot topic, and if this has been beaten to the ground, forgive me. I'm not a regular part of the Samba community. Although I have been using Samba for years, I now have to use it in a corporate environment utilizing some of it's more modern features. Let me just say, that it's been several hours of testing/troubleshooting to get where I am now. (And I don't

Hey all, I've got an issue with my Samba server. I can't seem to get file shares to map using Server Name, but I can get them to map using IP Address. Here is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = ADMIN server string = Snap Server timestamp logs = yes dos filetimes = yes dos filemode = yes inherit acls = yes name cache timeout = 0 winbind uid = 101-6000000 winbind gid =

Hi, I'm running samba 2.2.7 on redhat advanced server with approximately 40 win2k clients and having a serious problem with the clients. Intermittently the clients will lose their connection to the server for approximately 30 seconds. It's like the socket connection is being reset or something. Here's a sample output from a client log file: [2003/04/12 15:13:08, 0]

My Dell server was preloaded with Redhat 7.2 , Linux 2.4.7-10, gccv2.96 with Ext3 file system. I want to install the machine into my company W2k domain using winbind but my Linux kernel does not support the needed ACls. I Does the latest Linux kernel come with ACL support and if so should I just update the kernel to 2.4.19 which I think is the latest production quality kernel? The ACL

Good Afternoon, I have Samba 2.2.1a running on a SPARC Solaris 2.7. All of a sudden I'm having a problem with one PC mapping Samba drives. In the log file for this PC I get the following error messages: [2001/12/11 12:47:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(565) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 8: ERRNO = Broken pipe [2001/12/11 12:47:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(729)

My log files are getting quite big because of all the errors I get in a day. Here is a snipet: Jan 27 10:03:06 localhost smbd[17694]: [2004/01/27 10:03:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(919) Jan 27 10:03:06 localhost smbd[17694]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Jan 27 10:03:06 localhost smbd[17694]: [2004/01/27 10:03:06, 0]

Hi, I would like to know, what's the importance of sid and rid, for: 1) a win2k to samba migration, with roaming profiles 2) brand new domain on samba, with roaming profiles If rid and sid need to be migrated to a samba+ldap how do I do it? Another thing is, I've read in ldap-smb-HEAD-howto.html that the builtin accounts are implemented internally in the samba server. Does this mean I

Hello, I am wondering if someone is using Sambe between Unix and Unix. What is pro and con comparing to NFS? Thanks in advance! Andrew ************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the

hi all, i have download the latest verion of samba (2.2.5) and acltools from bestbits. i would use an fileserver with acl support, but i have some problems. after uncompress the tar-archiv i type in the sourcedirectory: ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support and i get the following: "checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for

Hi ! I installed a SNF 7.20 firewall and a Samba/Debian PDC. I wonder if it's possible to restrict web/ftp/mail access according to user's group ... (the only way I now would be to restrict access according to IP adresses but I'm not interrested in this solution). Is there a way to do it with Samba (I guess no but any idea would help ...) Thanks.

Heya, i got this problem with stubborn win98 machine refusing to show up on the browse list, my samba is the local/domain master browser and login server for the whole local network, using user security. the workstation has all the same protocols and settings like the other 6, only difference is the ip and the netbios name, the login used on that machine matches existing username on my linux

We have been able to successfully install / configure SAMBA on our LAN / WAN. Everything is working out just fine.. Just 1 little problem (And I'm sure it is something I screwed up or missed in the docs). When changing a computer name on the client PC (Win2k), I receive an "Access Denied" error. I've even tried using the root account to change the name with no avail.

Hi All, I have the following section in my smb.conf file: [Satish' Hindi Alltime Hits - Gems] path = /mnt/d-drive/Music/Satish' Hindi Alltime Hits Gems browseable = yes public = yes readonly = yes guest ok = yes I am able to browse this share through win2k but not from winNT. But If I change the share

Hi I've just built a Debian 3.0 Woody Samba server with version 2.23a. Using stable rather than unstable. After putting it into a network with another Samba server I find that the Win98 client machines can't connect to it but they can connect to the other server. The other server is set to OS level 65 and the new one is somewhere below that. I've run all the usual tests and they

hi list, i try since weeks to authenticate my linux-clients against my samba-server. This works very fine with 2 windoze-cliens. but i still cannot authenticate with my linux-clients. i am @office now, thats wy i ask instead to test: i heard, winbind is used to authenticate linux-clients against the samba-server. the wbinfo -u gives me back: DOMAIN-user (i use the minus as separator) so i

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 knorr smbd[5439]: [2003/10/31 10:27:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(919) knorr smbd[5439]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected knorr smbd[5439]: [2003/10/31 10:27:02, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388) knorr smbd[5439]: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer knorr smbd[5439]:

Hi Kristis, Kristis Makris wrote on Friday, 18 July 2003 9:19 a.m.: > [2003/07/17 12:16:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(900) > getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected > [2003/07/17 12:16:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(388) > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer > [2003/07/17 12:16:06, 0]