similar to: Winbind Question...

I'm running SaMBa 2.2.3a, compiled by myself... I heard a long time ago in this list that you can reduce the size of the binaries by recompiling the source, whit some new variables... But I don't know what are they... Thanks ______________ Demerson Zounar Analista de Suporte demerson@zaffari.com.br -----Mensagem original----- De: Eric Roseme [mailto:eroseme@emonster.rose.hp.com] Enviada

Hello together! I didn't read the whole thread, but if you simply want to connect to a share without beeing prompted for a password, try to use the following configuration... security = server password server = %m which means the following: password server: (excerpt) The name of the password server takes the standard substitutions, but probably the only useful one is %m , which means the

Hullo All I hjave a problem with SaMBa 2.2.1a with HP/UX 11.00. It seems to work fine, but after a couple hours users received a message in Windows (all 95) like that ... "There were no servers to log you into", or something like that (Win95 Brazilian Portuguese). It seems like it can't find the domain master server... Below is my smb.conf... Some help is greatly apreciated...

Hullo, All... I'm maintaining about twenty HP/UX 11.00 Servers (L1000, 512Mb), all with SaMBa installed. Today, I notice that two of them have the SMBD processes eating more CPU than expected... Bellow is one of my TOP screens... Processes that take 0.40% CPU now take 7.61%! System: L024 Tue Jul 16 14:39:41 2002 Load averages: 6.09, 6.33, 5.88 121

for your information, it didn't work... it needs a password... but i don't want to send any password... any ideasd? -----Mensagem original----- De: Rasmus Reinholdt Nielsen [mailto:rasmus@narani.dk] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 12 de agosto de 2002 17:34 Para: Demerson Zounar; samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: Re: [Samba] Simple and Stupid Share... # Global parameters [global]

Hullo, All... I have HPUX 10.20 with SaMBa 2.2.3a installed... All I want to do is make a single share with read only access for everybody, no matter the user people are using, in other words, they don't need to have the user on the server side. I tried to setup, with no success. Anybody knows something? Thanks...

Hi, maybe (probably ??) it's me, but it took me more than a week to get winbindd working on Redhat 9. It works now after changing a parameter in smb.conf, but I have NO idea why. Maybe some of you already had the same problem. If so, PLEASE clearify ! Thanks... PS as you will see later, getent group also does not work. This is an independent problem I think... can it have something to do

All - I'm having a problem with the "valid users" directive working. I have an Accounting share that only the Accounting department should have access to. However, I am unable to lock the directory down so only they can access it. I am running samba-3.0.0-2 from an RPM on RedHat 9.0. Below are details of my trials. This is a pretty urgent need, please. Thank you! smb.conf

Any idea when the RC1 binaries are going to be finished? Jeremy Lahners Manager, I.T. The Schemmer Associates Inc. (402) 493-4800 (P) (402) 493-7951 (F)

apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>

Hi out there, i got a very good hint to the solution of the problem with the error-message: 2002/02/25 15:38:52, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.170.20.8: code = 0x0 The hint was from Demerson Zounar: > I faced this problem some time ago, and the solution was an absence of the > parameter netbios name in smb.conf.

and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by

I'm having an unusual problem with my new samba servers. Notice, servers is plural, meaning all of my new servers are experiencing exactly the same problem at different times throughout the day, which leads me to believe that the "problem" is not with samba but with my Win2k server. However, I still need help in determining what is causing the problem... At various times during

ｨ zeta.procergs.com.br") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id <S12866463AbPHTLwe>; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 21:52:34 +1000 Received: from [200.248.116.68] ([200.248.116.68]) by zeta.procergs.com.br (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA39864 for <samba@samba.anu.edu.au>; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:57:34 -0300 Received: from zafnt2.zaffari.com.br by [200.248.116.68] via smtpd (for

Hi, does anybody have a list of working Linux Live CDs with Xen Support which I can use in a Xen Domain? What I''m looking for is more or less something like Knoppix with Xen Support so that I can use the yet-not-supported hardware of my Ferrari 4005 in the Linux Domain regards Bernd This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, for what it''s worth: There''s now a new Live CD for Solaris called Damm Small Solaris: http://www.sunhelp.ru/archives/179-Damn_Small_Solaris_0.1.1_English_Page.html In contrast to Belenix this Live CD works in Qemu - even without kqemu load the performance is not so bad. One important missing are the network driver for the network adapter emulated by Qemu. But they

Hi, I found a problem with the DNS resolution in a Solaris 10 DomU. The Test Environment was: I installed the Xen bfu on top of Solaris snv43 and booted the Dom0 with Solaris. Then I installed and booted a Solaris 10 DomU. In the Solaris 10 Dom0 the DNS resolution works; in the Solaris 10 DomU the DNS resolution does not work as expected: Inside the Solaris 10 DomU I can''t use

Hi unfortunately VirtualBox does not work yet in a Solaris Dom0: I installed VirtualBox beta and it runs fine on bare metal. Unfortunately the necessary driver does not load automatically in a xVM Dom0. It can be loaded manually but it looks like it does not work in a Dom0: bash-3.2# modinfo | grep vbox # this is a one time task: bash-3.2# cp /platform/i86pc/kernel/drv/amd64/vboxdrv

Trying to boot my Thinkpad T30 with Solaris snv_81 xVM it get the error message This version of Solaris xVM does not support this hardware The output of "echo ::interrupts | mdb -k" while booted without xVM is bash-3.2# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k IRQ Vector IPL(lo/hi) Bus Share ISR(s) 0 0x20 14/14 - 1 cbe_fire 1 0x21 5/5 ISA 1 i8042_intr 3 0x23

Hi, all I don?t know how can I configure the Samba print service in a HP-UX server. This OS don?t have the /etc/printcap file. What can I do in smb.conf ? Thank?s ------------------------------------------ Fernando Lanner Cardoso Cia. Zaffari Com. & Ind. Analista de Suporte/Inform?tica lanner@zaffari.com.br Porto Alegre - R.S. - Brasil ------------------------------------------