similar to: FYI: CentOS mailserver on nixspam RBL

John accused me of complaining about systemd... this here's *real* complaining. Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin' nixspam, because my giant hosting provider, that hosts millions of domains. Akemi has argued that nixspam works just fine (if so, then why did we get that spam a few weeks ago?). I've politely requested being put on a whitelist, and

listadmin, Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of domains, with too many running Windows, and so infected and sending out spam. They then send all mail via one mailhost, with the result that those of us with *no* spam coming out are frequently

I've been blocked twice this morning, and removed myself once - the first time, by the time I got to work and looked at the list, it was already gone. My hosting provider works with those jerks at manitu. I've ranted a number of times over the years at why their method is a *lousy* method for blocking spam in the second decade of the 21st century. Now this: here's another argument as

Hi, I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. General question to those of you who use RBL. Which lists do you recommend using? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site :

Karanbir, PLEASE! You've never responded to my question about whitelisting. That asinine nixspam did it to me again, and this time... seriously, I urge you, personally, to go there and try to remove a site. They've "enhanced their security", that is, mangling the capchas, to the point that it took me about five minutes or more, and about a dozen or 15 challenges, before I

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/26/2015 08:23 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> We've got a new RAID (a JetStor), and are trying to >> plug it in. > > When you asked about this three weeks ago, you didn't answer questions > about the model of JetStor product, and the conversation died there. > Could you provide that? I thought I had (unless it bounced, thanks to

try creating small /boot partition for kernel and then rest of disk for lvm.. -- Eero 2015-04-10 22:01 GMT+03:00 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: > Chuck Campbell wrote: > > I'm really at a loss. > > I had 5.11 running on this machine, from this physical boot disk, until I > > stepped on /bin the other day. > > > > I've tried installing Centos 5.10 and 5.11

Most of the time since last Thursday or so, that piece of crap called Nixnet (ix.manitu) has been blocking my hosting provider's mailservers. I did ask, when I talked to support last week, and they host *millions* of domains. They do not have a million techs (neither does google - but I'm *sure* none of you have ever gotten spam from google mail, right?). Again, I'll give my argument

Gary Stainburn wrote: > Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have > started again: <snip> A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block the mailhost. I've been thinking about

My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". I have not problem with the emails it noted as being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" as a commercial product. I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda software and "yum list '*barrac*'" comes up empty. What is this? Jon -- Jon

Hi everyone, Following this post: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/currency-conversion-function-tt906056.html#a906061 I was trying to run the code: foo <- function(from, to, date){ url <- " http://www.oanda.com/convert/classic?script=..%2Fconvert%2Fclassic&language=en&value=1 " params <-

Hi, Hope any one can help me. I am running centos 5.2 with sendmail and rbl feature.? I need to recieve all emails come to my sales account regardless of rbl . I looked on web and gave up. All I found was if I added To:sales@ ok in my sendmail.mc , sales account will bypass rbl and get all the emails but its not working. Any help ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi there, I'm using dovecot 2.0.16 with a mysql user database. From time to time when we have a big influx of messages (perhaps more than 30 concurrent rcpt to:<> sessions at the same time so no auth-workers free?) or when we have a transient issue connecting to the database server, we see the message: Jan 25 16:38:23 mailbox dovecot: auth-worker: sql(foo at bar.com,1.2.3.4):

Am 17.06.2019 um 18:09 schrieb Mike Burger: > On 2019-06-17 06:20, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. >> SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL >> (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. >> >> General question to those of you who use

Am 17.06.2019 um 16:50 schrieb Bowie Bailey: > On 6/17/2019 6:20 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. >> SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL >> (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. >> >> General question to those of you who use

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steffen Kaiser wrote: > passdb { driver = ipdeny args = <host>/matchpattern/action .... > *** } > With next passdb{} as 1st in chain: passdb { driver = checkpassword args = "/tmp/chktst ip=%r service=%s" result_success = continue result_failure = return-fail } and this script BEGIN /tmp/chktst #!/bin/bash echo

This was brought up in 2014, and left without conclusion, so I thought it would be time to bump it :) I would love a way to do allow_nets based on an RBL check, could this be added to the feature-list? https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets Thanks -- Tom

I just read about the webpage http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html on the qmail list. This makes it possible to use RBL on a per user basis. Perhaps somebody can adopt this for Postfix and mailman---or whatever is used to manage this list? Mate

No idea where else to ask this and get a real qualified answer but here. Not exactly pure centos question....but... I am adding blacklists to my postfix smtpd settings. I have the inkling that after the first lookup for a domain or ip that my dns caches the result and I no longer bother the RBL or RHSBL list owners anymore in that instance. Is that correct? I hate to waste their resources if

On 6/17/2019 6:20 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. > SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL > (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. > > General question to those of you who use RBL. Which lists do you > recommend using? The best free blacklist that