On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:11:20 g wrote:> so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. >That is not the only harm. These people are very good and very effective confidence tricksters and are experts at getting vulnerable people to send them money which they usually cannot affort to lose in the first place.
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have started again: Return-path: <0000014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000000 at amazonses.com> Envelope-to: gary at ringways.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100 Received: from a8-81.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.8.81]) by mail.ringways.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <0000014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000000 at amazonses.com>) id 1ZUvWO-000OYv-WE for gary at ringways.co.uk; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1440675545; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Feedback-ID; bh=fVEJhWs8Q7XcrcFzcgBz4XutQlRwasAG6LBk6AIcMXk=; b=sLK9RxQFIiu3wpu8v9mmIVYJcoXkVBacgYyzSYbkYbK/oZidKkKY/qDJWTDYKrCY ksDKQs7UBpcSp4Sqog0hbDkK2DkkZiHT1kvzSb3qqkAnX3Ducm2AkOctxdRF9z76Pj1 4tXWWopJjegOWIw8kgqR9gCRHqwv+eBxjlQlZnuADKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=koy5qxgfr6wvd7nlse57372ojbusvxt2; d=enjoylovef**k.com; t=1440675545; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=fVEJhWs8Q7XcrcFzcgBz4XutQlRwasAG6LBk6AIcMXk=; b=bbmKwgB0hG2rPrgHwUes63nmRozyqrLi7VVW4qmLC6019nRt0Cf4enbC60kJQzZw Qx/UaYetwOkCm4LUObL7zw+uP0JJYzNXVooAZD7NdB1Dzs5gwT5B5ltM2sv0xxA11ev vnxdKiIUER2QKOcFOkYczDJV6QYtpOj3yr7cPYMMDate: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:39:05 +0000 To: "Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk>" <gary at ringways.co.uk> From: Caylian Curtis <caylian at enjoylovef**k.com> Reply-To: caylian at enjoylovef**k.com Subject: Re: Re: [CentOS] please block user Message-ID: <0000014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000000 at email.amazonses.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.10 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_51d7d61107a8c78e364939b05ceed99b" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SES-Outgoing: 2015.08.27-54.240.8.81 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.dCINwTXKWoGdJVCeRWe4yCPvzru4XXSdsNzu7qbGWgA=:AmazonSES
On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote:> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have> started again:<>> From: Caylian Curtis <caylian at enjoylovef**k.com><> not true. she has been at that site for a while. i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted to this thread. i will say emailing Julie Anna was more fun than with Caylian. Julie Anna is much better looking than Caylian, btw. :-b -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .
Gary Stainburn wrote:> Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have > started again:<snip> A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block the mailhost. I've been thinking about this since yesterday, when I got back from vacation, to hear from my manager that he had to screw with mailman, because we were getting a lot of emails from elsewhere, subscribing to one or more of our lists... and having the target be one of three gmail accounts - a DDoS against them (and we assume that they're doing it to a lot of other places). Anyway, given the number of times I've been blocked by nixspam (which I found is run by IX, a German IT mag, and that they don't answer emails to *them*, either), I've been trying to think of a *reasonable* way to block that doesn't do collective punishment to the many domains of a huge hosting provider, and that's my best thought so far. mark