Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Difference between samba 2.0.0beta4 and NT4.0 ?"
1999 May 19
2
Bug samba 2.0.4 ?
Hi
I just installed Samba 2.0.4 under Solaris 2.5.1
Now when someone trys to save a MS Word file to his home directory on
the SUN he gets a "not enough permissions"
msg.
Looking on the unix side I see a file ~WRD1741.tmp with permissions of
000 .
I upped the log level to 3 and found this ..
call_nt_transact_set_security_desc: file = forNT/~WRD1741.tmp, sent 0x7
[1999/05/19
1999 May 27
0
Problem : same mangled name for different files
Hello samba-list-readers,
I have 2 files with long filenames on a samba-server (V2.04b). The filenames
are
xxxxx_APB.h and xxxxx_SEL.h
For some reason the first part of the name has to be xxxxx_
In the file-property-sheet of windows-explorer the MS-DOS-name of
BOTH files is XXXXX_~5X.H. That means to me, that the hash-algorithm,
which generates the MS-DOS-name is to weak and produced a
1999 Jun 16
0
Pls. HELP : v1.9.18p10 much more robust with security=server than v2.04
Hello samba-list-reader,
why is samba v2.0x worse than v1.9.18p10 with respect to
NT-authentification with security=server ?
I have exactly the same smb.conf on two servers, one running samba v2.04b
and the other running samba v1.9.18p10 (Sun Solaris2.6).
With v1.9.18p10 everything works fine since months.
On the server running v2.0x in about 10% of all NT-authentification-tries
(with net use
2000 May 20
0
PLEASE : Help with filename-collisions
Hello samba-users,
I have a problem with mangled-name-collision :
I have 2 files with long filenames on a samba-server (V2.07, solaris).
The filenames are
xxxxx_APB.h and xxxxx_SEL.h
For some reason the first part of the name has to be xxxxx_
The mangle name of both files is XXXXX_~5X.H (look at the fileproperties in
explorer)
That means to me, that the hash-algorithm,
which generates the
1998 Dec 16
1
user level authentication in samba-2.0.0beta4
I've compiled samba 2.0.0beta4 on Sun (sparc) Solaris 2.6.
I can use smbclient to list the shares, but whenever i try to connect to
the machine, i get the following error message:
session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password
pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.)
I have SECURTY = USER in smb.conf
when I try to use smbpasswd to reset the password on
1999 Jan 02
0
samba-2.0.0beta4
Hi, all
I'm trying to setup samba-2.0.0beta4 on redhat v5.1 (2.0.34).
But
1. When I use "smbclient '\\localhost\service' -U username",
it has the error:
session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password air
in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.)
2. in smb.conf :
hide dot files = yes
hide files = /name*
1998 Apr 22
0
NT4.0 + SP3 reports can't NetServerEnum from DMB using Samba
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am writing to ask your help with a problem whereby 3 NT4.0 +
Sservice Pack 3 servers frequently log (in their event lists) that the
browsing service cannot get the list of domain resources (the reply to
NetServerEnum2) from the master browser (when the boxes are
functioning as backup browsers).
The situation is :-
. NT machines browsing on both NetBUEI and NetBT
1998 Mar 27
1
NT4.0 rename on Samba 1.9.18p2 share on SunOS 4.1.3
I am seeing an odd behavior with NT4.0 SP3 workstations trying to rename
files on Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on SunOS 4.1.3 servers. Rename, whether
it is run from Explorer, winfile.exe, or command prompt fails with
"Access Denied
I don't see the problem from Win95 PCs at all, and I don't have the
problem with shares from Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on Solaris 2.5.1 servers
using identical
1998 Feb 26
0
Linux client and NT4.0 server
Hi,
I am running Linux on RedHat 5.0 and Samba 1.9.18p2 to wish to connect
to an NT 4.0 server running NT LAN Manager 4.0.
I have gone through the documentation and can still not get
smbmount nor smbclient to work.
I cannot get smbclient -L to give me a listing of the shares on the
server.
I DO get a browser list, but no shares. I only have partial access to
the server and must go thru the
1999 Aug 04
0
samba-2.0.4b/NT4.0(SP3): share name
Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems?
Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it
as
a replace of samba-1.9.18p8.
The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me.
1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse
the share names of Japanese SJIS, but now I couldn't access the shares
because
2006 Jun 13
0
NT4.0 SP6 can't connect to Samba 3.0.22
I have a Samba 3.0.22 server running as
security = user
encrypt passwords = no
and WinNT 4.0 service pack 6 with plain text password.
WinNT4 client can't connet to Samba 3.0.22 server:
[2006/06/13 10:26:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(579)
Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
[2006/06/13 10:27:00, 5] auth/auth.c:make_auth_context_subsystem(489)
Making default auth method list for
1997 Jul 23
0
NT4.0 connection only as geust account ?
Hi,
I have:
- Linux 2.0.30
- NT 4.0
- Samba 9.16pl11
- same user name and password on Linux and NT 4.0 (user1, pwxxx)
and the smb.conf of below.
When I create a file on the samba share [tmp] from the NT 4.0 machine, the
owner is always 'nobody' (my guest account). I can not manage it to
give it my own name (user1).
I can not create a file in another directory neither, because samba
2003 Mar 05
0
Samba BDC in a subnet of a Windows NT4.0 domain?
Hi, I've been playing with samba/the idea of Samba as a server for a remote
location on our network.
How we're setup right now is this:
Windows NT 4.0 PDC/BDC/Member Server (hosting Exchange server).
The PDC has file sharing for our projects directory and needs to be
accessible by employees everywhere. the BDC has SQL server for accounting
purposes and also needs to be accessible from
2003 Sep 15
0
AW: Samab and a NT4.0 PDC
Actually i should rephrase that.
Samba works fine, but what do I put down as `valid users'? certainly I can't
use %U like with the template homedir.
Any suggestions?
Tia,
Cheers,
-brian
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Brian Reichholf [mailto:brian.reichholf@login.co.at]
Gesendet: 15 September 2003 07:32
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Samab and a NT4.0 PDC
I've
2007 Jan 24
0
Fwd: Samba members in NT4.0 to AD upgrade
--- Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> From: Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk>
> I've got an NT4.0 domain that I'm planning to
> upgrade
> to Active Directory.
> I've got a couple of Samba member servers in the
> domain, various versions above 3.0.
>
> So I have two questions:
>
> 1. Are there any gotchas with this scenario or
1998 Aug 27
0
problem with smbclient access to NT4.0 WS share
Thanks to all for a wonderful package. It's sharing fine from my
Debian box but smbclient isn't working the other way round. Here's
the detail:
I have three machines together: an NT4 Workstation (sp3), a
Win95 machine and a Debian (Hamm = latest stable release). The
NT 4 machine has a shared drive I want to access from my Debian
machine. I can access that share from the win95
1999 Jun 22
1
Control characters with Samba/NT4.0
Dear List,
When we copy an ascii file from SunSolaris Samba server to NT4.0
workstation, the file is getting control characters at the end of each
line. Appreciate, if any clue given to solve this problem.
Regards.
1999 Aug 04
0
samba-2.0.4b/NT4.0(SP3): share name (PR#19444)
szcathay@public.szonline.net wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems?
>
> Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it
> as
> a replace of samba-1.9.18p8.
> The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me.
> 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse
> the
1999 Aug 18
1
Automatic printer driver installation for NT4.0/NT2000 clients?
Dear All,
I've seen the PRINTER_DRIVER.txt doc on getting the PRINTER$ share set up to
automatically add printer drivers to Win95 clients. It explicitly says that
the procedure described does not work for NT4.0 clients.
I can't find any other documentation on setting up a PRINTER$ share suitable
for NT4.0 or NT2000 clients either in the distribution (2.0.5a) or the web
site.
Is this
1999 Oct 17
0
When viewed on NT4.0 file sizes of samba share are incorrecly too large
Hi everyone,
Here is my problem:
All NT4.0 machines accessing a samba share located on a Solaris 2.6 server
(running smbd version
2.0.4b) see the file sizes to be MUCH (terabytes) larger than they actually
are. This is true
both when looking through Explorer (file manager) and through MS-DOS prompt.
On Windows98 machines the files are irrationally large via Explorer, but are
the correct size