similar to: Difference between samba 2.0.0beta4 and NT4.0 ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Difference between samba 2.0.0beta4 and NT4.0 ?"

1999 May 19
2
Bug samba 2.0.4 ?
Hi I just installed Samba 2.0.4 under Solaris 2.5.1 Now when someone trys to save a MS Word file to his home directory on the SUN he gets a "not enough permissions" msg. Looking on the unix side I see a file ~WRD1741.tmp with permissions of 000 . I upped the log level to 3 and found this .. call_nt_transact_set_security_desc: file = forNT/~WRD1741.tmp, sent 0x7 [1999/05/19
1999 May 27
0
Problem : same mangled name for different files
Hello samba-list-readers, I have 2 files with long filenames on a samba-server (V2.04b). The filenames are xxxxx_APB.h and xxxxx_SEL.h For some reason the first part of the name has to be xxxxx_ In the file-property-sheet of windows-explorer the MS-DOS-name of BOTH files is XXXXX_~5X.H. That means to me, that the hash-algorithm, which generates the MS-DOS-name is to weak and produced a
1999 Jun 16
0
Pls. HELP : v1.9.18p10 much more robust with security=server than v2.04
Hello samba-list-reader, why is samba v2.0x worse than v1.9.18p10 with respect to NT-authentification with security=server ? I have exactly the same smb.conf on two servers, one running samba v2.04b and the other running samba v1.9.18p10 (Sun Solaris2.6). With v1.9.18p10 everything works fine since months. On the server running v2.0x in about 10% of all NT-authentification-tries (with net use
2000 May 20
0
PLEASE : Help with filename-collisions
Hello samba-users, I have a problem with mangled-name-collision : I have 2 files with long filenames on a samba-server (V2.07, solaris). The filenames are xxxxx_APB.h and xxxxx_SEL.h For some reason the first part of the name has to be xxxxx_ The mangle name of both files is XXXXX_~5X.H (look at the fileproperties in explorer) That means to me, that the hash-algorithm, which generates the
1998 Dec 16
1
user level authentication in samba-2.0.0beta4
I've compiled samba 2.0.0beta4 on Sun (sparc) Solaris 2.6. I can use smbclient to list the shares, but whenever i try to connect to the machine, i get the following error message: session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) I have SECURTY = USER in smb.conf when I try to use smbpasswd to reset the password on
1999 Jan 02
0
samba-2.0.0beta4
Hi, all I'm trying to setup samba-2.0.0beta4 on redhat v5.1 (2.0.34). But 1. When I use "smbclient '\\localhost\service' -U username", it has the error: session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password air in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) 2. in smb.conf : hide dot files = yes hide files = /name*
1998 Apr 22
0
NT4.0 + SP3 reports can't NetServerEnum from DMB using Samba
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with a problem whereby 3 NT4.0 + Sservice Pack 3 servers frequently log (in their event lists) that the browsing service cannot get the list of domain resources (the reply to NetServerEnum2) from the master browser (when the boxes are functioning as backup browsers). The situation is :- . NT machines browsing on both NetBUEI and NetBT
1998 Mar 27
1
NT4.0 rename on Samba 1.9.18p2 share on SunOS 4.1.3
I am seeing an odd behavior with NT4.0 SP3 workstations trying to rename files on Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on SunOS 4.1.3 servers. Rename, whether it is run from Explorer, winfile.exe, or command prompt fails with "Access Denied I don't see the problem from Win95 PCs at all, and I don't have the problem with shares from Samba 1.9.18p2 shares on Solaris 2.5.1 servers using identical
1998 Feb 26
0
Linux client and NT4.0 server
Hi, I am running Linux on RedHat 5.0 and Samba 1.9.18p2 to wish to connect to an NT 4.0 server running NT LAN Manager 4.0. I have gone through the documentation and can still not get smbmount nor smbclient to work. I cannot get smbclient -L to give me a listing of the shares on the server. I DO get a browser list, but no shares. I only have partial access to the server and must go thru the
1999 Aug 04
0
samba-2.0.4b/NT4.0(SP3): share name
Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems? Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it as a replace of samba-1.9.18p8. The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me. 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse the share names of Japanese SJIS, but now I couldn't access the shares because
2006 Jun 13
0
NT4.0 SP6 can't connect to Samba 3.0.22
I have a Samba 3.0.22 server running as security = user encrypt passwords = no and WinNT 4.0 service pack 6 with plain text password. WinNT4 client can't connet to Samba 3.0.22 server: [2006/06/13 10:26:55, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(579) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2006/06/13 10:27:00, 5] auth/auth.c:make_auth_context_subsystem(489) Making default auth method list for
1997 Jul 23
0
NT4.0 connection only as geust account ?
Hi, I have: - Linux 2.0.30 - NT 4.0 - Samba 9.16pl11 - same user name and password on Linux and NT 4.0 (user1, pwxxx) and the smb.conf of below. When I create a file on the samba share [tmp] from the NT 4.0 machine, the owner is always 'nobody' (my guest account). I can not manage it to give it my own name (user1). I can not create a file in another directory neither, because samba
2003 Mar 05
0
Samba BDC in a subnet of a Windows NT4.0 domain?
Hi, I've been playing with samba/the idea of Samba as a server for a remote location on our network. How we're setup right now is this: Windows NT 4.0 PDC/BDC/Member Server (hosting Exchange server). The PDC has file sharing for our projects directory and needs to be accessible by employees everywhere. the BDC has SQL server for accounting purposes and also needs to be accessible from
2003 Sep 15
0
AW: Samab and a NT4.0 PDC
Actually i should rephrase that. Samba works fine, but what do I put down as `valid users'? certainly I can't use %U like with the template homedir. Any suggestions? Tia, Cheers, -brian -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Brian Reichholf [mailto:brian.reichholf@login.co.at] Gesendet: 15 September 2003 07:32 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Samab and a NT4.0 PDC I've
2007 Jan 24
0
Fwd: Samba members in NT4.0 to AD upgrade
--- Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > From: Leon Stringer <leonstr@yahoo.co.uk> > I've got an NT4.0 domain that I'm planning to > upgrade > to Active Directory. > I've got a couple of Samba member servers in the > domain, various versions above 3.0. > > So I have two questions: > > 1. Are there any gotchas with this scenario or
1998 Aug 27
0
problem with smbclient access to NT4.0 WS share
Thanks to all for a wonderful package. It's sharing fine from my Debian box but smbclient isn't working the other way round. Here's the detail: I have three machines together: an NT4 Workstation (sp3), a Win95 machine and a Debian (Hamm = latest stable release). The NT 4 machine has a shared drive I want to access from my Debian machine. I can access that share from the win95
1999 Jun 22
1
Control characters with Samba/NT4.0
Dear List, When we copy an ascii file from SunSolaris Samba server to NT4.0 workstation, the file is getting control characters at the end of each line. Appreciate, if any clue given to solve this problem. Regards.
1999 Aug 04
0
samba-2.0.4b/NT4.0(SP3): share name (PR#19444)
szcathay@public.szonline.net wrote: > > Hello, everyone. Could you help me to solve the problems? > > Recently I downloaded samba-2.0.4b souce and after I compiled it, I used it > as > a replace of samba-1.9.18p8. > The smb.conf file was used as before. But there are two problems to me. > 1)When I used samba-1.9.18p8, the Windows NT4.0(sp3) workstation can browse > the
1999 Aug 18
1
Automatic printer driver installation for NT4.0/NT2000 clients?
Dear All, I've seen the PRINTER_DRIVER.txt doc on getting the PRINTER$ share set up to automatically add printer drivers to Win95 clients. It explicitly says that the procedure described does not work for NT4.0 clients. I can't find any other documentation on setting up a PRINTER$ share suitable for NT4.0 or NT2000 clients either in the distribution (2.0.5a) or the web site. Is this
1999 Oct 17
0
When viewed on NT4.0 file sizes of samba share are incorrecly too large
Hi everyone, Here is my problem: All NT4.0 machines accessing a samba share located on a Solaris 2.6 server (running smbd version 2.0.4b) see the file sizes to be MUCH (terabytes) larger than they actually are. This is true both when looking through Explorer (file manager) and through MS-DOS prompt. On Windows98 machines the files are irrationally large via Explorer, but are the correct size