similar to: (PR#8308)

estewart@dudley.lib.usf.edu wrote: > > On an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 and using gcc 2.8.1 > > ipc.c: In function `api_RNetServerEnum': > ipc.c:1194: warning: passing arg 4 of `qsort' from incompatible pointer > type > > Compiling nmbd_incomingrequests.c > nmbd_incomingrequests.c: In function `process_node_status_request': >

Hi all, Inforworld (that's a rather large computer magazine is the USA) are thinking of doing an article on people using Samba to replace/supplement NT servers in commercial organizations within the USA. I told their editor I'd send out this request for people who fit the following criteria to send in their details : They need people who are : (a). USA Based. (b). Using Samba but

leon@eatworms.swmed.edu wrote: > > I ran into a bug in samba-2.0.6: an infinite loop caused by two-level > getgrent calls. validate_group, in the middle of a getgrent loop, may > indirectly call user_in_group_list, which resets getgrent. As a result, > validate_group never exits. The attached patch works around this. It's a > quick and dirty patch which I'm including

I got mcp mag a day or two ago, Great writeup!! I was a little surprised that they ran such a glowing review of samba, with some of the negative implications on NT. It is very nice to see Microsoft show an interest in interoperability. -Steve Roylance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 6:41 PM >

TO THE SAMBA TEAM: MAY YOUR TRIBE BE HERE FOREVER! YOU' SIMPLY GREAT BUT i CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY YOU A PIZZA BUT OUR NATIVE PIE "BUKO (YOUNG COCONUT) PIE" IS BETTER! i HAVE BEEN USING SAMBA 1.9.16P9 AND STILL ALRIGHT. PERHAPS I'LL DO CHANGE TO SAMBA 2.0 AND THIS IS A LONG WAY! i DID TRIED SAMBA SINCE MY OFFICE CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY NFS TO SERVE AT LEAST 20 PCs AND

bob@hobbes.dtcc.edu wrote: > > this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a > solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance > update something broke. > > log.smb: > > [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [1999/08/06 11:36:49,

phl@cyways.com wrote: > > >From the Samba 2.0 beta announcement: > > 5). Cross protocol data integrity > --------------------------------- > > An open function interface has been defined to allow > "opportunistic locks" (oplocks for short) granted by Samba > to be seen by other UNIX processes. This allows complete > cross protocol (NFS and SMB) data

"Rodolf, Frank" wrote: > > Hi! > > Not a bug, but something we really miss... ... > We are using Samba on a number of platforms, including RedHat Linux and HP > UX, but mostly on the Solaris platform. It works great but, like I said > before, we miss one thing: support for ACL... > > Is there any chance of this being added, and if so, what's the status

Hi All, Sorry to be posting this :-(, but if you're using the 'username map' parameter with Samba 1.9.18p8, here's a small patch you may need. Without it the username map will work once per smbd and then refuse to map subsequent names. This isn't a big problem as normally, on a single user NT or 95 system, username map will only be called once per session (in the

Hi, I am getting this log entry in the nmb.log file. Any ideas why I am getting it? query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 9.36. 220.43 for name WHITE<1d>. This response was from IP 9.36.223.255 Thanks Chip

Unknown recipient ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 1:02 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2158 > SAMBA Digest 2158 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) msaccess and samba prob solved -

Hi, I've got a problem with a 2.2.2 samba server. It has, a number of times, recorded the following lines for a short period of time of 10 seconds, and then not again for days. Has anyone seen these before? It all appears to be random characters. It has only happened from 2 machines out of 30 or so. [2005/01/13 09:33:29, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy(877) ERROR: string overflow by 363 in

Hello, I run samba 3.0.4 on a RHL9 server. Samba is a domain member of a W2k3 ADS and I use CUPS as printing mechanism; therefore Samba is compiled with Kerberos 1.3.1-7 and cups-devel. 3.0.4 runs pretty good, printing via CUPS runs well too, only the following messages I see constantly (this flooding my logs) while using 3.0.4: winbindd.log ========= [2004/07/27 16:07:04, 1]

Phillip.Link@alcatel.fr wrote: > The problem > ----------- > I've been trying to install the latest samba distrib (2.0.5a) on a hpux > 10.20 machine, but the connection times out, apparently because of > shared memory access. > > Trying to make an smbclient connection (or using the windows nt explorer > to connect generates the following log.smb (smbd launched as smbd

bscott@hamptonsys.com wrote: > > I do not know about the original poster, but here at Hampton Systems Group, > I have noticed a... not quite a bug... maybe a "conflict of interest", with > regards to oplocks. I often edit Perl CGI scripts from my Win32 workstation. > The scripts themselves reside on our Linux server. Since an oplock is opened > on those scripts by

Hi all, Over the weekend (isn't it always :-), someone on the BugTraq list posted an analysis (not exploit code) of a potential buffer overrun in Samba, that has been present in all versions (including 1.9.18p5). As Andrew Tridgell was working over the weekend he quickly produced a fix for this (it was a problem with code using sprintf) and released it as 1.9.18p6 on Sunday, May 11th.

btenison@dibbs.net wrote: > > I keep getting the following in the log files now that we've upgraded to > the latest cvs 2.0 branch. Any ideas what we can do to fix this? > > Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: [1999/03/23 08:45:34, 0] > smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(773) > Mar 23 08:45:34 gate smbd[22692]: oplock_break: end of file from client > Mar 23 08:45:34 gate

Windows 98 client cannot print via samba to PrintPro printer "exported" via Cups/PrintPro on PrintPro/Samba server. "Exporting" with Cups on server node allows print drivers to be downloaded to Windows clients from the server. Any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated. Win98 node gim98.rsmas.miami.edu [129.171.97.21] connects to Samba 3.0.0-15 server "prima"

Jay.Anderson@dw.deere.com wrote: > I believe the problem that occurs is that oplocks are left hanging on > the server, and are never removed. After a period of time, all the > shared memory that is allocated to file locking is filled, and the > server starts sending garbage back to the clients when they request > locks, confusing the clients and creating all sorts of strange

Just Installed 3.0.5rc1 and the problem persists unfortunately, heres a sample of my log : wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [TAENO~EI.PDF] Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03