similar to: SUMMARY: Amanda 2.3.0.5-Samba 1.9.16p11 PC backups...

At the bottom is what I got returned from AMANDA 2.3.0.5 after patching Samba 1.9.16p11 to give estimates. Any idea what I might not have done yet? My disklist reads: shokk \\thor\depot nocomp-user-gnutar To connect successfully to that server with smbclient, I have to do this, giving the same password that I now have in /etc/amandapass: smbclient \\\\THOR\\DEPOT -U BACKUP Also, the

smbstatus reports the following...that my NT users on this one samba server are connected as the guest user "nobody". All Win95 users are connected under their proper name. Anything I need to change? Samba version 1.9.16p11 Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- gdl nobody nogroup 1555 gdl-dt (137.202.211.8) Wed

I am getting the following level 5 logging for a Win95 PC under user-level sharing that is sharing to the user "backup" with "full-access". Can anyone help me get logged in via smbclient? shokk:/#> smbclient \\\\EOPORTO-DT\\DEPOT -U BACKUP doing parameter os level = 5 doing parameter domain controller = 137.202.xxx.xxx doing parameter wins proxy = yes doing parameter wins

> 6) RE: Encryption > by John H Terpstra <jht@aquasoft.com.au> >------------------------------ > >Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 18:10:53 +1000 >From: John H Terpstra <jht@aquasoft.com.au> >To: "'redhat-list@redhat.com'" <redhat-list@redhat.com> >Cc: "'samba@samba.anu.edu.au'" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: RE:

We have been using samba since 1995 and have found it superb, Thanks to all. Recently I built Samba1.19.17alpha4 on a DECstation 5000 running Ultrix 4.4 and included -DFAST_SHARE_MODES This results in UIST>smbclient -L UIST Session request failed (0,0) with myname=UIST destname=UIST Unspecified error 0x0 Your server software is being unfriendly and ERROR

One thing that needs to be mentioned is that for PC backups, the amanda patch that has to be applied to samba requires that you use level 3 logging to see the "Total" line. Also, does anyone know what this error means? smb: \> recurse directory recursion is now on smb: \> dir received 5 entries (eos=1 resume=0) . D 0 Thu Jun 5

I hate to suggest this, but we need to do what has been done on a few other lists that I'm on. We need to close the list off to only people that are members. It's a shame to see so much spam here after seeing it in my personal mailbox all day long. At 11:21 PM 7/24/97 +0000, you wrote: >Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:14:25 +0200 (MET) >From: Konstantin Eftaxias <kef@eeb.de>

I'm getting the following in my logs when people try to connect to our Samba server. Any idea why this happens? The smb passwd file is there, and the user *does* exist. When I try to connect to the server, Win95 gets a message saying "You must supply a passowrd to make this conection. \\salamanda\IPC$". Security = server, the WinNT boxes have SP3 loaded, and this is Samba

Yes!!!! You just solved a problem I've been having since 1.9.17p1!!!! I didn't realize that CIFS was limited to passthrough authentication for only its domain, so that listing multiple password servers from different domains would not work...the following did. Yeeeehhaaa! Hurm...excuse me. I added to the following in my config to make this work: netbios aliases = unix1 unix2 (not

I've been getting this error when clients attempt to connect. testparm passes OK, and smbd and nmbd launch OK, but when a client attempts to connect I get the following error messages (in the log): locking/shmem.c:smb_shm_open(930) ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code Invalid argument locking/locking.c:locking_init(169) ERROR: Failed to initialize share modes! I've been trying

I'm a new linux user trying to run samba on Linuxppc R5 but smbd doesn't appear to be responding properly. Both nmbd and smbd are configured as daemons and netstat lists netbios-ssn as listening. I can't find anything else that would conflict starting from inetd. Nmbd appears to work as I can list the available servers and the server is seen by the clients but I don't need

I have posted a few messages earlier redgarding the lack of a STATUS..LCK file. I have progressed a bit further on the advice of some nice people on this list serve. Now, I seem to have the follwing problem with samba 2.0.4b on Linux 2.2.6 runnning on a Motorola StarMax 3000. after executing smbstatus, i get this message: Samba version 2.0.4b Service uid gid pid machine

Hi everyone, let me start with an apology for what may turn out to be my own ignorance. I'm new to samba, and relatively new to linux, so please be gentle. :) I am currently having a problem seeing the shares on my samba server. i am running 2.0.3 on linuxppc 1999 on a Macintosh G3 266. My Win95 OSR-2 486 can see the server, but cannot access the shares. when i attempt to connect with

Can anyone tell me what the error is with recursion here? It is keeping my smbclient from giving AMANDA a sice for the share. Without recursion, and stepping through the directories manually, I can do the dir and get no errors. smb: \> ls received 8 entries (eos=1 resume=0) . D 0 Thu Aug 15 09:19:58 1996 .. D

Here's my setup: Caldera Open Linux Lite (kernel 2.0.29) Samba 2.0.4a Windows Domain (Two Windows NT 4.0 Servers -- one PDC, one BDC -- and numerous Windows NT 4.0 Workstations) I can see my Linux box in Network Neighborhood on my Windows NT boxes. I can open the Linux box and see the top level shares available. When I try to open a share I see one or two anonymous folders. Anyone

Ernie, Thanks for the great info.. Based on what you were seeing, would you suspect that part of the problem is with the combination of NT and the 3com card (3c595)? Currently, we are ONLY seeing this under NT Workstation (not server) and almost all of our machines have this same 3com 3c595 card (only if using 100BaseT).. -- Rick -----Original Message----- From: Ernie Oporto

--- samba@samba.org wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2218 > > For information on unsubscribing see > http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) > by "Brandon Schnell" <brandonschnell@hotmail.com> > 2) AutoCAD R14 and Eagle Point > by Hank Burton <wburton@literati.com> > 3) Can't locate point and

Hi, I have a problem when I compile Samba 2.0.3, the next error message is generated doing "make": Using LIBS = Compiling locking/shmem.c locking/shmem.c: In function `smb_shm_open': locking/shmem.c:921: `PROT_READ' undeclared (first use this function) locking/shmem.c:921: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once locking/shmem.c:921: for each function it appears in.)

David Allan Finch wrote: > Has anyone considerd modify the Unix encypt to use > the same system as NT. IE the encypted pasword in the > /etc/passwd or NIS/NIS+ table is the same for both? Err. That would be a *really* bad idea. See the l0phtcrack source for details :-). Seriously, though. The password hashes used on NT are very poor. They don't use salt and people are now

People, Please could someone in the know help me out with the shared memory configuration (/etc/system?) required on Solaris 2.5 and above to support samba with about 1000 open files per process. Since 1.9.18p3 I have been getting errors like: Apr 2 12:15:39 skyhawk smbd[27493]: Can't create or use IPC area And now with 1.9.18p4 I get the same, plus: Apr 2 12:15:39 skyhawk smbd[27493]: