Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Encryption and unfriendly errors for 1.9.17a5?"
1997 Dec 20
0
No subject
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: hurricane-list-request@redhat.com
Return-Path: <hurricane-list-request@redhat.com>
Received: from innovace.aquasoft.com.au (jht@innovace.aquasoft.com.au
[192.245.14.12])
by innovace.aquasoft.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA00772
for <jht@innovace.aquasoft.com.au>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 18:49:03 +1100
Received: from aqua.aquasoft.com.au
by
1997 Aug 04
0
SUMMARY: Amanda 2.3.0.5-Samba 1.9.16p11 PC backups...
My whole problem as far as samba was concerned was not compiling with DES
support *and* that I did compile with FAST_SHARE_MODES. One clue was this
in the samba.log. file. I then did a dejanews search for smb_shm_open and
came up with that portion of the solution.
ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code 11
The DES portion came from just reading the WinNT.txt file that came with
Samba.
I
1997 Jul 25
7
Amanda 2.3.0.5-Samba 1.9.16p11 PC backups...
At the bottom is what I got returned from AMANDA 2.3.0.5 after patching
Samba 1.9.16p11 to give estimates. Any idea what I might not have done yet?
My disklist reads:
shokk \\thor\depot nocomp-user-gnutar
To connect successfully to that server with smbclient, I have to do this,
giving the same password that I now have in /etc/amandapass:
smbclient \\\\THOR\\DEPOT -U BACKUP
Also, the
1997 Jul 18
2
MMap failed with code 22
We have been using samba since 1995 and have found it superb, Thanks to
all. Recently
I built Samba1.19.17alpha4 on a DECstation 5000 running Ultrix 4.4 and
included -DFAST_SHARE_MODES
This results in
UIST>smbclient -L UIST
Session request failed (0,0) with myname=UIST destname=UIST
Unspecified error 0x0
Your server software is being unfriendly
and
ERROR
1997 Jul 31
5
SAMBA digest 1372
David Allan Finch wrote:
> Has anyone considerd modify the Unix encypt to use
> the same system as NT. IE the encypted pasword in the
> /etc/passwd or NIS/NIS+ table is the same for both?
Err. That would be a *really* bad idea. See the l0phtcrack
source for details :-).
Seriously, though. The password hashes used on NT are very
poor. They don't use salt and people are now
1998 Jun 30
0
No subject
Yes!!!! You just solved a problem I've been having since 1.9.17p1!!!!
I didn't realize that CIFS was limited to passthrough authentication for
only its domain, so that listing multiple password servers from different
domains would not work...the following did. Yeeeehhaaa!
Hurm...excuse me.
I added to the following in my config to make this work:
netbios aliases = unix1 unix2 (not
1998 Jan 29
0
Samba-1.9.18p2 Red Hat Linux RPMs
The Samba-Team are pleased to announce that Red Hat Packages are now
available for Red Hat Linux 4.2 (Intel only) and 5.0 (alpha and Intel).
You may obtain your SRPMS and RPMS from:
ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/Binary_Packages/redhat/{RPMS,SRPMS}
In due course we hope that these packages will appear in the contrib area
on: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contrib/hurricane/{SRPMS,RPMS}
Kind regards,
1997 Jul 28
0
Smbclient to Win95 machines
I am getting the following level 5 logging for a Win95 PC under user-level
sharing that is sharing to the user "backup" with "full-access". Can
anyone help me get logged in via smbclient?
shokk:/#> smbclient \\\\EOPORTO-DT\\DEPOT -U BACKUP
doing parameter os level = 5
doing parameter domain controller = 137.202.xxx.xxx
doing parameter wins proxy = yes
doing parameter wins
1999 Jun 23
1
ERROR: Failed to initialize share modes!
I've been getting this error when clients attempt to connect. testparm
passes OK, and smbd and nmbd launch OK, but when a client attempts to
connect I get the following error messages (in the log):
locking/shmem.c:smb_shm_open(930)
ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code Invalid argument
locking/locking.c:locking_init(169)
ERROR: Failed to initialize share modes!
I've been trying
1999 Aug 31
0
No subject
I'm a new linux user trying to run samba on Linuxppc R5 but smbd doesn't
appear to be responding properly. Both nmbd and smbd are configured as
daemons and netstat lists netbios-ssn as listening. I can't find anything
else that would conflict starting from inetd. Nmbd appears to work as I can
list the available servers and the server is seen by the clients but I don't
need
1999 Jun 23
0
Big problems
I have posted a few messages earlier redgarding the lack of a STATUS..LCK file. I have
progressed a bit further on the advice of some nice people on this list serve. Now, I seem to
have the follwing problem with samba 2.0.4b on Linux 2.2.6 runnning on a Motorola StarMax 3000.
after executing smbstatus, i get this message:
Samba version 2.0.4b
Service uid gid pid machine
1999 Aug 22
0
newbie needs help
Hi everyone, let me start with an apology for what may turn out to be my
own ignorance. I'm new to samba, and relatively new to linux, so please
be gentle. :)
I am currently having a problem seeing the shares on my samba server. i
am running 2.0.3 on linuxppc 1999 on a Macintosh G3 266. My Win95 OSR-2
486 can see the server, but cannot access the shares. when i attempt to
connect with
1998 Jun 30
5
NT Crashes when doing large network file Xfers (was Re: NT crashes during smbtar)
Ernie,
Thanks for the great info.. Based on what you were seeing, would
you suspect that part of the problem is with the combination of NT
and the 3com card (3c595)? Currently, we are ONLY seeing this
under NT Workstation (not server) and almost all of our machines
have this same 3com 3c595 card (only if using 100BaseT)..
-- Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Ernie Oporto
1999 May 27
0
Diagnosis Test Pass, But...
Here's my setup:
Caldera Open Linux Lite (kernel 2.0.29)
Samba 2.0.4a
Windows Domain (Two Windows NT 4.0 Servers -- one PDC, one BDC --
and numerous Windows NT 4.0 Workstations)
I can see my Linux box in Network Neighborhood on my Windows NT boxes. I
can open the Linux box and see the top level shares available. When I
try to open a share I see one or two anonymous folders.
Anyone
1999 Aug 31
0
SAMBA digest 2218
--- samba@samba.org wrote:
> SAMBA Digest 2218
>
> For information on unsubscribing see
> http://samba.org/listproc/
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1)
> by "Brandon Schnell" <brandonschnell@hotmail.com>
> 2) AutoCAD R14 and Eagle Point
> by Hank Burton <wburton@literati.com>
> 3) Can't locate point and
1999 Apr 16
2
Problems compiling Samba 2.0.3
Hi,
I have a problem when I compile Samba 2.0.3, the next error message is
generated doing "make":
Using LIBS =
Compiling locking/shmem.c
locking/shmem.c: In function `smb_shm_open':
locking/shmem.c:921: `PROT_READ' undeclared (first use this function)
locking/shmem.c:921: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
locking/shmem.c:921: for each function it appears in.)
1997 Sep 10
1
Netlogon share and locking
Rob,
I hope you have referred to the example smb.conf file. We really cut our teeth
on some of the example config settings. It is IMPERATIVE that nothing in the
NETLOGON share should become locked - this breaks the logon process very
badly! Some Win95 clients will always hang on logon if any files end up being
locked in the netlogon share.
For the record, here is an extract from
1998 Apr 02
0
Solaris Shared Memory and Samba 18p3-4
People,
Please could someone in the know help me out with the shared memory configuration (/etc/system?) required on Solaris 2.5 and above to support samba with about 1000 open files per process. Since 1.9.18p3 I have been getting errors like:
Apr 2 12:15:39 skyhawk smbd[27493]: Can't create or use IPC area
And now with 1.9.18p4 I get the same, plus:
Apr 2 12:15:39 skyhawk smbd[27493]:
1997 Aug 05
0
Recursive dir error...
One thing that needs to be mentioned is that for PC backups, the amanda
patch that has to be applied to samba requires that you use level 3 logging
to see the "Total" line.
Also, does anyone know what this error means?
smb: \> recurse
directory recursion is now on
smb: \> dir
received 5 entries (eos=1 resume=0)
. D 0 Thu Jun 5
1997 Jul 24
0
SAMBA digest 1365/ commercial ads
I hate to suggest this, but we need to do what has been done on a few other
lists that I'm on. We need to close the list off to only people that are
members.
It's a shame to see so much spam here after seeing it in my personal
mailbox all day long.
At 11:21 PM 7/24/97 +0000, you wrote:
>Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:14:25 +0200 (MET)
>From: Konstantin Eftaxias <kef@eeb.de>