similar to: Suggested change to "--partial" usage.

Hi There, This post is brought about due to the following two: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg10702.html http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg10709.html I have a situation where I need to upload large files over an unstable link (resuming is a requirement) and only when they are complete can they be renamed and hence replace the original file. The

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

I had a case where I was using the --partial option (client is running rsync-pre5, server daemon is rsync-pre8). The transfer was interrupted and the partially transferred file replaced the destination file on the server. My understanding is that the partially transferred file would be kept but it would not replace the destination file...that is, both files would be kept so that rsync could pick

Thanks Paul. That should help! Kevin, For a local copy is running a plain rsync transfer ( rsync <src> <dest> ) essentially the same as a "drag-and-drop"? The benefits of using rsync in that situation would all come from choosing flags appropriate to the desired transfer? Thanks, Blake -----Original Message----- From: rsync [mailto:rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org] On

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync does not change anything on the source. Only on the target. Only root can change the ownership of a file. On 09/10/2015 07:16 PM, Celso de Sousa Junior wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thank you very much. I changed my user in the remote machine (su). > > Then, by trying again with rsync but with no modification in the > source

Rsync has no memory of what other instances of rsync have done in the past. An existing file with a different name is of no interest to it unless --delete in which case it would be deleted. Maybe what you really want is --partial-dir? On 6/7/23 16:17, Lacey, Nathan wrote: > I'm suggesting a partial file that isn't hidden is worse. > Because any other app looking at the file

Hi Kevin, Thank you very much. I changed my user in the remote machine (su). Then, by trying again with rsync but with no modification in the source folder, I see that file ownership continues the same. Would be possible for rsync to change the ownership in this case (I am not root) ? Thanks, Regards,CJ Em Quinta-feira, 10 de Setembro de 2015 20:01, Kevin Korb <kmk at

Sent from BlackBerry? on Airtel -----Original Message----- From: rsync-request@lists.samba.org Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:00:33 To:rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 58, Issue 29 Send rsync mailing list submissions to rsync@lists.samba.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync or, via email, send a message with

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

> On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this will make it easier for both the people sending patches as well as for me to snag the changes. I'll continue to push changes to the samba git as well.

Hi I would like to have changes (chown) in the destination. However, some files did not changed size or rights. All files should have new owner. Thanks, Regards,CJ Em Quinta-feira, 10 de Setembro de 2015 20:26, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> escreveu: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync does not change anything on the source.  Only on the target. Only

problem is he's trying to rsync into the target dir and have the side effect of delete. so an empty dir would necessarily need to be in the target of course and thus created there, triggering the quota block. he tried to avoid this by using device files then 'blocking all device files' but i think rsync figures out first there's nothing to do, so it just stops and doesnt do the

Thanks Fabi, et all, I will follow up with your suggestion using ssh for renaming the directories after rsync. I appreciate the help. Freddie On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 4:00 AM <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi Ram, In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB. You can

Hi raf, Curious issue you have. A few things: What distro(s) are you using? Same rsync version on both ends? Hash of files look correct before and after the rsync? Have you tried using inotify to monitor for changes at the fs level? You should see a "read" on the sender and a "read" + "write" on the receiver. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 11:25 PM raf via rsync

I have it up and working. for me at least. http://crypotworksapps.blogspot.com/2011/04/windows-and-linux-backups-made-dirt.html On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00 AM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ?

This sounds like a job for Relax and Recover: http://relax-and-recover.org/ Cal Sawyer | Systems Engineer | BlueBolt On 19/07/15 13:00, rsync-request at lists.samba.org wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

I THINK YOUR A VERY SAD BUNCH OF LIFES WAISTERS On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ? ?https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send a message with subject or body