similar to: CentOS Project Infrastructure

Good Evening. As the 'translation community' is growing I would like to suggest to add the 'revision number' of the original article on which the translation is based on, so someone else could easily diff to keep translations up to date. It would be great if translators add something like: 'translation based on #N' as footnote where N is the version of the original

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90932 Bug ID: 90932 Summary: gm105 font glitches with kernel 4.1rc Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Good Evening, I am trying to forward packages on an internal device using iptables: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT but the packages are still blocked, e.g.: Feb 6 20:58:28 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.100.177 DST=172.28.2.184 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=16609 PROTO=TCP SPT=7166 DPT=3590 WINDOW=0

Good Morning, I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is detected correctly as ide_cf and all partitions are shown. But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia ide installation i am searching for a way to

I don't know if I really like this background though it is kind of neat. Where do I find the app to change this?

I don't know if I really like this background though it is kind of neat. Where do I find the app to change this?

Good Evening, I am trying to set up an iptables forward rule in order to forward all packages that are routed throgh the internal device eth0: iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT but the packages are still dropped. Best Regards Marcus

Hi all, is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT -p UDP & -p TCP -d $IP1 & -d $IP2 ? Best Regards Marcus

Hi all, does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then used within the -d statement? Best Regards Marcus

Hi all, I have started working on the next Pulse issue #0902 and therefor copied the template to the Editing section. I would like to contribute the following articles: A short introduction of the Artwork SIG Getting started with Multimedia on CentOS Also I would suggest to create a monthly newsletter instead of bi-weekly, as we are all very busy, I guess ;) It would be great if ppl like Russ

Dear Patrice, I have noticed that you are referencing to the Stahnma repository for Spacewalk Client Tools. These are quite old and I would suggest to use the tools from: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum instead. Mr. Suchy already pushed some of the packages to Fedora/EPEL so they might be available there, soon. Besides that the Spacewalk Team is thinking about a split between client/server on

Hi all, as most of you may have noticed, Alain and I am working towards the new web environment setup. Therefore we have already created a new wiki category where we are trying to outline our vision of a CentOS 'Web Style' and how it could be applied to the applications we are using (or planning to use). http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2/WebEnvironment To make this happen some HTTP

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90069 Bug ID: 90069 Summary: input lag Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter:

hi, Just wondering what people use / recommend to keep multiple machines in sync with their iptables policy. What I use at the moment: 1) Puppet, to setup and manage a fairly complex per service type ruleset that is then maintained on the remote machines by puppet ( in that it brings together all the various bits of iptables snippets based on what manifests and roles are deployed to a

Am 06.05.2016 um 01:26 schrieb Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev: > > There are > many many people who aren’t even commenting at all because they fear > being attacked in this thread. Now you're contradicting LLVM's own description that it's a friendly community. Also: How many is "many, many", actually? How many of these are really in fear, how many are just trying

Good Evening (Dag and Karan), I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML instead of the Wiki. I would personally prefer to link to the RHEL Betas from a (not yet created) Test-driving RHEL SIG page instead of the CentOS download page. This should be meant to promote project related downloads (resources

Dear Ralph, have you already generated/submitted a sitemap for moin? Also Thomas Waldmann suggested to place a prominent link to 'TitleIndex'. Best Regards Marcus

Hi all. while translating the current Release Notes, I realiced that previos Versions contained a: ------ . [:Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSX.X/Stub:Release Notes for the ISOs] ------ link at the end of the page. What was that used for, and can it be removed now? Best Regards Marcus

Hi all, I have again noticed that the wiki does not really show up in search results and wonder if it has any impact that robots.txt on wiki.centos.org is empty. Perhaps it should at least contain User-agent: * ? Best Regards Marcus

Hello everybody! To continue the original (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/75674) discussion of offload infrastructure I have an updated document with more details for your attention. The document is a consensus of the contributors representing a number of institutions: ANL, AMD, IBM, Intel and Texas Instruments. Our intent is to have a discussion and an approval from