similar to: Tmp directory and sticky

Hello, I am fixing up a system for someone and they did not make a separate partition for /tmp...but I want to make it noexec, nosuid. I came across a site that said I could skip all the mount/unmount and new partition stuff (which would probably include downsizing a lvm to make room for it)... by adding this in fstab /tmp /tmp bind nosuid,noexec,bind 0 0 and then reboot... There is

Hello, We own a CentOS Server which hosts a few domains using Cpanel, however each host or domain has its own user and its own folder under /home, we want a separate user(newuser1) to have read and write privileges in all home's subdirectories so we can do some tasks remotely using WinSCP, that user is already in the sudoers group and the root login is disabled in SSH for security, but I

Hi everyone, One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop, it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been focused more recently on the face you rotate to. This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)

I am testing some kickstarts on ESXi virtual machine with pair of 16GB disks. Partitioning is lvm over raid. If i am using "logvol --grow i get "ValueError: not enough free space in volume group" Only workaround i can find is to add --maxsize=XXX where XXX is at least 640MB less than available. (10 extents or 320Mb per created logical volume) Following snippet is failing with

I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no

Hi, am running: Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs Samba as PDC Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by directory's sticky bit. This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their explorer. But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ I was thinking either running a sum on the directory or each file...but thinking a simple date check would be fine. The idea is web application, except the uploads area for photos, never has changes to its files except when I change it. However, if it gets

Does mounting /tmp as noexec,nosuid break anything in CentOS 5? I've been in solaris land forever and a day and this is a pretty standard security measure. I noticed CentOS comes default mounting /tmp with both those options allowed.. I'm getting constant php hack attacks against (mostly script kiddie level stuff right now) my server and will rest much easier with this setting in place..

I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour) Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was

Lo folks, I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL. I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i

Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number

Hi there, I have a xapian index whose results are being sorted by a value, with (PHP bindings): $enquire->set_sort_by_value($sort_data_value); This is because I want the results returned in chronological order of publication date. However, I now have a need to have certain results be 'sticky' at the top of the resultset, regardless of their publication date. Obviously there are

Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging for help..lol http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html This shows a working effort of bonded eths, bridged into a vm, and a few other things. The only missing thing is something on the host that ends up putting the VM internet connection into some kind of limbo. Whether it is hardware related, bug related, libvirt nat

Dear I encounter this error on Samba 3.0.28a, i would like to know how to fix it, The file is owned by root, i don't understand whats going wrong... smbd[15232]: [2011/02/18 16:32:22, 0] param/loadparm.c:load_usershare_shares(4878) Feb 18 16:32:22 virtualbox smbd[15232]: load_usershare_shares: directory /var/lib/samba/usershares/data is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit

I've set "force directory mode = 1775" in smb.conf, but when I make directories in a share through network neighborhood, I end up with 0775, i.e. user has rwx, group rwx, others rx. The sticky bit is not getting set. What am I doing wrong? thanks in advance, Ed Schernau ed@schernau.com Network Architect

Sorry for an off-topic question, but anyone knows how to make network configuration (done with ifconfig/route add) sticky in nexenta core/napp-it? After reboot system reverts to 0.0.0.0 and doesn''t listen to /etc/defaultrouter Thanks.

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have