samba - Nov 2003 - ACL + sticky bit

Lo folks,

I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within
samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL.
I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and
"change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is
that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only
change it. So i need the sticky bit set on groups within ACL.
So does any1 know if this command will do the trick? 

setfacl -m d:g:group:rwt ./dir 

cause sticky bit is usually set on user level and directory level, afaik. Or is
there an other way to accomplish that?

Thx in advance

grtz

rmi

If I'm reading your message right, I think you want to add d to the -m
flag.  This sets the default ACL

-----Original Message-----
From: samba-bounces+ruedu=fmymca.org@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+ruedu=fmymca.org@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of rmi
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:05 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] ACL + sticky bit

Lo folks,

I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL
within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL.
I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and
"change"
on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full"
acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i need the
sticky bit set on groups within ACL.
So does any1 know if this command will do the trick?

setfacl -m d:g:group:rwt ./dir

cause sticky bit is usually set on user level and directory level,
afaik. Or is there an other way to accomplish that?

Thx in advance

grtz

rmi

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba