Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Is this failed Asterisk setup typical?"
2015 Jan 30
2
JITTERBUFFER function
WTF is a jitterbuffer?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com>
Date: 01/29/2015 10:41 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] JITTERBUFFER function
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:56 AM,
2009 Nov 10
12
Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventually merged into Linus Torvalds'' mainline Linux kernel tree?
After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen.
[1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html
[2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors
http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html
[3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux
2009 Nov 10
12
Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventually merged into Linus Torvalds'' mainline Linux kernel tree?
After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen.
[1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html
[2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors
http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html
[3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux
2010 Jan 30
12
Best way to connect various applications?
Good evening,
I''ve got three different self-programmed Rails application I need to
connect and manage with a 4th "supervisor" application.
There''s a wiki application, there''s a shop application and there''s a
business directory application all with seperate user database etc.
What I want now is one single user table so it can be all controlled by
one
2006 Mar 17
3
Samba 4 Clustering
Hi List,
From what I've read in many mailing lists, Samba 3 is not truly
clusterable.
From what I understand, people have been able to cluster Samba with
varying levels of success. Transparent failover and active-active file
serving ( 2 or more smbs serving the same files (through a cluster
filesystem like GFS) from multiple cluster nodes simultaneously ) are
two things that are not
2003 May 27
3
The Wrong Choice: Locked in by license restrictions
A colleague pointed me to this article advocating R as a Matlab
substitute. Here is the link (deliberately on two lines:
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/
originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci902076,00.html
I'm not a Matlab user, but I understand that it provides a nice front
end to the Linpack collection of numerical linear algebra routines. My
friend and I wonder if R can really
2019 Sep 20
2
[nbdkit PATCH] curl: Compile with libcurl even without smb(s) protocols
I needed to compile nbdkit on CentOS 7 which is missing these protocols in curl,
so hence the conditional compilation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
---
I have this patch so that I can compile it on CentOS 7 (fully updated), but I'm
not sure what is the support policy and I didn't even check whether the libcurl
there is old or whether the SMB support is
2003 Nov 07
4
IBM to Run VoIP On Linux
For those who don't wake up at 5.00 am and start reading /.
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid7_gci935769,00.html
--
Dave Cotton <dcotton@linuxautrement.com>
2008 Sep 09
1
A glimpse into the future for RHEL 6 and CentOS 6
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid39_gci1328938,00.html
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
2004 Jan 21
0
Fw: Word-of-the-Day: wiki
hope this help some one else --as it helped me, in undertanding
contributions to * wiki pages...
Regards!
Samuel
----- Original Message -----
From: "whatis.com" <WhatIs-BAD63EB5A68046E1@lists.techtarget.com>
To: "whatis.com" <WhatIs@lists.techtarget.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:31 AM
Subject: Word-of-the-Day: wiki
> THE
2006 Dec 22
1
NUT Christmas mail
Dear NUT users and developers,
Like the other years, before taking a small rest, here are some news
related to NUT.
* First, you should have seen the 2.0.5-pre1 release announcement.
I don't think 2.0.5 is very far, but I realized that I've made an
archive including the .svn directory (bad, bad me. I should know that
release are made against exported svn, not checked out!)
* Next,
2006 Dec 22
1
NUT Christmas mail
Dear NUT users and developers,
Like the other years, before taking a small rest, here are some news
related to NUT.
* First, you should have seen the 2.0.5-pre1 release announcement.
I don't think 2.0.5 is very far, but I realized that I've made an
archive including the .svn directory (bad, bad me. I should know that
release are made against exported svn, not checked out!)
* Next,
2016 Nov 14
2
STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER for printer trying to connect to smb share
I have a kyocera TA-205C printer that is can scan to pdf and place the file
on a smb share.
I have a user on my domain (PCEDOM\printers) that can login and access the
share. I tested it out with smbclient and was able to create a file where
the printer is supposed to be able to put the file.
The printer gave a very unhelpful error message, so I did a packet capture
to find the error. (see
2014 Sep 15
1
Multiple Domains/Winbinds, ntlm_auth/wbinfo issue
Ok I'm at a loss, I have 2 instances on winbindd / smbdd / nmbdd running (basically copied to install from samba-multiple-domains.blogspot .com but with my domains and ip's)
But the issue I have is that even though both domains joined, and I can see all the winbinds and smbs running, and no errors in the logs, it appears that wbinfo / ntlm_auth only work with one of the units, no matter
2007 Dec 23
11
RAIDZ(2) expansion?
I skimmed the archives and found a thread from July earlier this year
about RAIDZ expansion. Not adding more RAIDZ stripes to a pool, but
adding more drives to the stripe itself. I''m wondering if an RFE has
been submitted for this and if any progress has been made, or is
expected? I find myself out of space on my current RAID5 setup and
would love to flip over to a ZFS raidz2 solution
2009 Feb 18
11
Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work
I''m hoping to get some general clues about what all is required to get
an experiment going with zfs.
I''ve managed to install osol-11 in a vmware on windowsXP host from a
recent *.iso.
I''m following along with Simon''s blog showing how to set up ZFS. I''m
newbie with both ZFS and Solaris but the instructions seem pretty
clear.
However I''m
2008 Mar 31
1
Problem in working with domain DFS links
Hi,
First, I will try to make my terminology clear:
There are two "things" MS calls DFS:
1. Server/share DFS - in this case you can define a "virtual
server/share" that when a client tries to connect to, the server will
direct it to another, real, server/share to which the client should
connect. The virtual server/share may contain one or more real
server/share
1997 Nov 29
1
Workgroup popups with samba
Hello,
I'd like to know if there's a way to receive Workgroup's winpopup messages
with samba under linux.
If it's impossible, what are the technical problems caused by such a request ?
Thank you
--
,,,
o +
+-----------------------ooO---(_)---Ooo---------------------------+
| "Xylo", a.k.a
2002 Dec 24
1
large file handling problems in 2.2.7a
Hi,
The release notes say 2.2.7a fixes some large file handling problems in
smbclient, but I think not all. I'm seeing the following problems still:
- large files in mounted filesystems (smbmount) report incorrect file sizes
with Unix 'ls' and hence copy incompletely from an smbfs filesystem to an
ext3 filesystem.
- although an smbclient 'ls' command lists the size of a
1999 Jul 09
1
Samba 1 vs. 2, locking and Windows Terminal Server Edition
On Samba 1.9.18p10 and previous versions, each of the multiple users on
the same Windows Terminal Server Edition machine would get their own
smbd process. With Samba 2.0.x (I'm currently testing 2.0.4b), this has
changed so that every user on a WTSE machine uses the same smbd
process. File ownerships are assigned correctly, but file locking does
not work. If one user on a WTSE machine has a