Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Parallel port access speed, cpu usage"
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote:
> On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
>> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote:
>>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source
>>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang).
>>
>> I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should
2012 Aug 28
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On 28.08.2012 14:47, Cameron Zwarich wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote:
>
>> On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
>>> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote:
>>>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source
>>>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang).
>>>
2012 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote:
>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source
>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang).
>
> I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a
> goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate
> information about the AST,
2006 May 01
8
Windows vs Linux
Warning: Sligthly off topic.
http://shelleytherepublican.com/2006/04/linux-european-threat-to-our-computers.html
Quotes:
> And guess what software Osama Bin Laden uses on his laptop?
>
> If you guessed it was Linux you would be 100% right.
> Next time somebody asks you how Al Queda agents pay for their
> rifles and rocket launchers, you can tell them that foreign hackers
>
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
Will this allow users to compile C++ (or some other language that LLVM
has a frontend for) to C, which then can be compiled using a C compiler
for a target architecture, for which only a C compiler exists?
Which use-cases do you have in mind for this backend?
Philipp
2005 Feb 15
2
Updating MetaData at the Relay
Sending again .... is this thing on?
On 11-Feb-05, at 9:20 PM, oddsock wrote:
> At 10:21 PM 2/11/2005, you wrote:
>> Now that 2.2.0 is out, we can update metadata on-the-fly. At
>> pulverradio.com we are working on an injector that takes the song info
>> from our broadcast automation software and dumps it in (thanks guys
>> for
>> the help). I realize that we
2012 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source
transform with LLVM (instead of Clang).
ether
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote:
> Will this allow users to compile C++ (or some other language that LLVM
> has a frontend for) to C, which then can be compiled using a C compiler
> for a target architecture, for which only
2006 Jun 17
5
How come wine doesn't improve?
Even though wine versions get released often and the weekly newsletters
seem to report progress I get the impression that wine is not really
improving.
Of course it happens that some applications work with newer wine
versions which didn't work with older ones, but at the same time old
applications stop working.
Is it only me that gets the impression that wine only changes over time,
but
2006 Mar 11
1
Non-linear Regression : Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos)
Hi..
i have an expression of the form:
model1<-nls(y~beta1*(x1+(k1*x2)+(k1*k1*x3)+(k2*x4)+(k2*k1*x5)+(k2*k2*x6)+(k3*x7)+(k3*k4*x8)+(k3*k2*x9)+(k3*k3*x10)+ (k4*x11)+(k4*k1*x12)+(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+
2006 Dec 08
3
Cross Network Based CD/DVD Burning Software
Hey friends,
I am using FC3 and Centos 4.0 at my home. I have one CD/DVD burner on
Centos4.0 and no CD/DVD burner on FC3 machine. I am looking for a free
client & server or cross network CD/DVD burning software something
like NeroNet available on Windows. Means on the one workstation(FC3)
the client software for CD/DVD burning will be installed, through this
client software the data to be
1999 Aug 27
0
FAQ? Speed issue
Hello all,
Server: 486-33, 20MB RAM
Client: K6-233, 48MB RAM
Copying a file from a Client -> Server ~= 450 K/sec.
Copying a file from Server -> Client ~= 60 K/sec.
FTP is in the 400-500 K/sec range, too, as is NFS.
The linux box has plenty of free RAM, and shows almost
no activity. In fact, the smbd process associated
with the copy shows < 2% CPU util (less than top!)
It seems as if
2003 Jun 17
0
dvd+rw+r for FreeBSD -- Progress but no success
That's where I first went for information. I've
successfully burned a CD-R using cdrecord, as opposed
to burncd, which I would normally use for ide burners.
I will check on the firmware.
Thanks,
Andrew Gould
--- "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> wrote:
> Try visiting
> http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ and make
> sure your
> hardware is
2008 Dec 26
2
DVD burner in WINE
I have a program, ProShow Producer, that works flawlessly in WINE, but I need to use a DVD burner in it. The program will only export the DVD slideshows to a disc, not an image, so I need to be able to use the burner or somehow fake it and save to an image. Does anyone know how I can either get the burner working or (ideally) fake the burner and create an image instead??
Thanks so much for the
2013 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Do not generate nopl instruction on CPUs that don't support it.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rafael EspĂndola wrote:
> Please include a testcase with the patch.
I'm sending testcase here. Compile it with
"clang -O2 -march=k6-2 -c loop.c"
> gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug?
Yes, it is gas bug. I should report it to binutils maintainers.
Mikulas
> On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka
>
2013 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Do not generate nopl instruction on CPUs that don't support it.
Please include a testcase with the patch.
gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug?
On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka
<mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the
> nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too.
>
> I
2013 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Do not generate nopl instruction on CPUs that don't support it.
Hi
This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the
nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too.
I created bug 17792 for that.
BTW. I think you should also optimize padding on these CPUs - instead of a
stream of 0x90 nops, you should generate variants of "lea (%esi), %esi"
instruction like gcc.
This patch disables generation of
2020 Nov 18
0
about imap-login: Error and imap: Error after Version-UP
Hi..
there is supposed to be only at most one (1) stats process. Having multiple stats processes breaks stats.
Aki
> On 18/11/2020 01:48 ????? <morikawa-k6 at itec.hankyu-hanshin.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
> Aki-san
>
> Last night We adjusted the "process_limit" in the stats service to get rid of the error.
>
> "client_limit" is in the blank
1997 Apr 30
2
R-alpha: New Incomplete Beta Function
Here is a drop-in replacement for the R incomplete beta function.
src/math/pbeta.c
It is a slightly modified version of the cephes library one from
Netlib. In the few cases I tried it seems to give at least 14
digit agreement with the one in S-PLUS (its hard to get more).
I'm not sure what performance is like. I'd like to know if it
helps with some of the problems which have been
2010 Aug 11
5
Getting EPROM programmer software to work under Wine
I have some software for an EPROM programmer that's intended to run under Windows. Of course, I would much rather it work on Wine...
The software in question is available here:
http://www.bkprecision.com/products/docs/software/845.zip
It installs fine, but when I run it, the software loads it's UI, and then throws up a message box that says simply "EPrivilege". When you click
2001 Nov 03
3
Vorbis 1.0 before the end of the year?
Hi guys.
IMO now it's definitely time for finalizing Vorbis and throwing it
in the arena.
Two reasons:
- RC2 sounds wonderfully well, I'm really amazed how good it is..
and I personally think there's little room for further improvement in
sound quality..
- portable music devices are starting to take off (see Waitec, Creative,
Apple and many other vendors).
Wouldn't be good