similar to: Asterisk 1.6 mysql cdr log problem

Hello! I would like to store ISDNCAUSE on automatic call-out campaign (possibly gives more detail on failed call). How is it possible? I have tried 'failed' and 'h' extension. No luck. Extension 'failed' does not know anything about ISDNCAUSE and 'h' extension is not called at all. Any idea? I am using Asterisk 1.2.14 on FC4 if it counts. Cheers, a

Hi, Do you have any example showing how to use SendFAX ? I can see several examples of ReceiveFAX but not a single one showing SendFAX. Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081127/b41ca08b/attachment.htm

When the asterisk a queue reset their counters? I 'm talking about this kind of info in asterisk console. >show queue 600 600 has 0 calls (max unlimited) in 'ringall' strategy (4s holdtime), W:0, C:14, A:8, SL:0.0% within 0s I just say that because I have a queue with strategy "Fewest Calls" working for a couple of mouths, and a new agent has been added this

Hi, Surely, I must be overlooking something. If I run the following SQL queries I don't get the same number of rows. Is this coherent? mysql> select * from queue_log where queuename = '4010' and FROM_UNIXTIME(time) between 20080308000000 and 20080313145900 group by callid; 357 rows in set (0.01 sec) mysql> select * from cdr where dst = 4010 and calldate between 20080308000000

I create my sip users using a common macro in 1.4: [internal] exten => 200,1,Macro(phones|200|SIP/200) [macro-phones] exten => s,1,Dial(${ARG2}|45|Tt) etc... But now in 1.6 this fails: -- Executing [200 at handsets:1] Macro("SIP/201-0942b530", "phones|200|SIP/200") in new stack [Nov 20 08:55:55] WARNING[5958]: app_macro.c:201 _macro_exec: No such context

Hi i have problem with AddQueueMember logic. I need login Agent(Member) in asterisk. use this option: for example: AddQueueMember(queuetest,SIP/ekiga,10,,Agent/13) and now i want to call to this Agent: exten => _1XX,1,Dial(Agent/${EXTEN:1}) call to 113 and asterisk should call to Agent => 13 on interface SIP/ekiga. This doesn't work, How can i do this on Asterisk 1.4(not

Hi, VERBOSE[6120] logger.c: -- Got SIP response 500 "Server Internal Error" I just noticed that i sometimes get those back from provider. They are currently general SIP message log entries with verbose level 3. I wonder if such SIP fails could generate at least WARNING in log? Currently i'm checking logs for warnings and errors, so i probably have missed those.. It would be

Hi All; I do not know if anyone faced such case in dealing with open vpn (as we need it for fring to be used from the mobile: Which mobile can be used to install the open vpn client on it, so we can use it to do a vpn channel with the server that has open vpn server? Regards Bilal

Hi guys I've just read this about the upcoming release of * 1.6: ?Better reporting through a new call event logging capability in Asterisk 1.6 will allow complete tracking of events that take place during a call. The goal, according to Fleming, is to provide more detail than traditional CDR (Call Detail Recording) features offer and to allow for more granular tracking and auditing.? That

Hi, In my application I jump to different extensions For example: [begin] exten => s,1,Goto(starts,s,1) [start] exten => s,1,Play(welkom) ..... exten => h,1,Goto(end,s,1) [end] exten => s,1,Macro(end_call) exten => s,n, Hangup When I look at my CDR record I see three different CDR's in my record. Is there a way to use one CDR on every call, and not

Hi all! Is anyone using the $subject setup? What I would like to do the following setup: 1. OXE is setup for receiving calls, handling Agents 2. Asterisk as external IVR on extension 9xxx connected with ISDN (Q.931) PRI The incoming calling route: 1. OXE handles incoming calls, answer 2. Transfer to extension 9xxx 3. Asterisk answer (using one channel) 4. IVR is handling calls 5. If needed IVR

Dear all, I'm trying to configure Asterisk to be able to ask the caller to enter a given password in order to continue dialplan execution. I've tested this feature using the Authenticate application like this: exten => _X./5219,1,Answer exten => _X./5219,2,Authenticate(1234,a) exten => _X./5219,3,Playback(pin-number-accepted) exten => _X./5219,4,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN},120)

Hi, according to discussion on asterisk IRC, where people said, that macros will be depracated, I tried to migrate from macros to contexts and Gosub but if I try to use gosub in extensions.ael, ael compiler complains, that I shouln't use Gosub app, but I can't find ael keyword, that will be Gosub equivalent, or can I ignore this ael warnings? thanks PJ LOG: lev:3 file:pval.c

Hi, I have an simple queue and agents defines with memeber => SIP/123. If for example Agent "SIP/123" has an call, the queue didnt care and tries to send additional calls to this agents. So Iam loosing time. SIP/123 (In use) has taken no calls yet How to stop this, especially when the device is not able to send an BUSY back. Use LOCAL channels and parse 'show queues' or

Hi guys, Does someone use a mysql database for accessing data and in the same time for storing cdr ? if that is the case, which module is used ? thanks -- Cyril SCETBON

I am running 1.4.10.1. I have a macro that is called from default for a certain extension (both below). I added NoCDR to s to try and stop extra CDR records, but I am still getting them. Any idea how to stop them? extensions.conf: [macro-STDEXT] exten =s,1,NoCDR() exten =s,2,Dial(${ARG1},30,Tt) exten =s,3,Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS},1) exten =s-NOANSWER,1,Voicemail(${ARG2}|u) exten

Hi, I'm having a question with asterisk queue system, is it a fifo or a lifo or random ? Sometimes when we have people waiting in the queue and new agents are connected to handle the load the first call that is handled is not the one which is already waiting for 4min, but the new one which has just arrived. However this doesn't happens everytimes Is it normal ? regards, benoit

Ping -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081121/8392150e/attachment.htm

Hi! I want to know the way that calls are answer in this case... I have queue1 and queue2, one agent that receive call from both queues. queue1 <- call1 queue1 <- call2 queue2 <- call3 queue2 <- call4 In my test the agent answer calls in this order: call1,call3,call2 and call4. I think this must be in this order call1,call2, call3, call4 like a big FIFO. Its ok this behavior? Could

Is there a way, for debugging purpose, to have a level where only Noop() cmds are shown in the CLI but nothing else in the dialplan appears (except for errors and warnings or course)? Mike -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081205/d3069cc9/attachment.htm