similar to: IAX multiport ATA

First of all, I'm not knocking Sipura/Linksys. I have heard very good things about their products. I'm just wondering if they are the only quality shop on the market. I know about the zoom 5801 where you can't dial out the FXO from SIP, only from the FXS port. And I have heard similar about the HT-488 also. I want to know if anyone else makes ATAs where all of the features work

For those of you who may be interest.... IAX2 loads are now available for the standard builds... http://www.aredfox.com/edownloadsiax2.htm Just a word of caution... Remember to change the ports over to 4569 from whatever. And don't forget to grab the palmtool from http://www.aredfox.com/download/tools/PalmTool.zip My own testing of IAX2 with both a phone and an ATA is that IAX2 is

I purchased an IAX2 hardphone, X100 otherwise known as a Netweb X100 or YWH100 with a PA168 chip and the latest firmware 1.45 available, from a US retailer. I was able to configure the phone to work with my Asterisk box, except the hold and transfer buttons do not work. When you press the hold button, it rings endlessly, the transfer button, displays "transferring" but it does nothing.

I've gotten nothing from http://bbs.atcom.cn on this so far. Perhaps someone on the list has experience with this. Is there a way to get MWI support for PA168V-based ATAs? Apparently some IP phones based on the PA168V chip has this support already (Atcom AT-320 for example) by configuring Asterisk with 'mailboxdetails=yes' in iax.conf. On my ATA, however, it does nothing. Any

Does anyone know why when calling out with an ATCOM AG-188 registered with IAX (haven't tried SIP), there is no ring. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070222/a4f29a97/attachment.htm

Does anyone know of an ATA which has a modifieable (open source) firmware AND that supports faxing. Granted most of them don't do faxing well but that is more of a problem with the network side. Michael Blood -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050831/8c13db6b/attachment.htm

Folks! I would appreciate if someone could send me a simple working h323 configuration file oh323.conf that is part of asterisk@home installation. I have tried to use the oh323.conf content listed on WIKI but it is just not working as my H323 endpoint ( PA168 based ATCOM Phone) cannot register. I need a working example of this file for similar phone. Seshu

I known. I'm using the 1.44 firmware version relesed on 26 may. I worked for italian IVR an HTTP pgaes. So i can only update asterisk with CVS and try atxfer. Thanks for all -----Messaggio originale----- Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Gavin Hamill Inviato: luned? 30 maggio 2005 18.40 A:

http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? How's it compare with the Iaxy? I'd like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less "no name", but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That's appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! :-) Any

Message: 1 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:53:36 +1100 From: "PHP Mechanic" <oliver.bode@phpmechanic.com> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Who makes these phones? To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <08d401c5121e$dbea4750$0200a8c0@oliver> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;

----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070905/c62f4465/attachment.htm

Hello I'm thinking of selling an Asterisk server based on Atcom's IP02 solid-state unit with one FXO and one FXS ports: http://atcom.cn/En_products_IP02.htm By default, this unit based on a 400MHz Blackfin 532 chip only has 64MB RAM and 256MB of NAND flash. Those can be increased to 128MB and 1GB, respectively. Do you think I can install Linux + Asterisk + LAMP (replacing MySQL with

My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox. I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different network. It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate against that number, which isn't present on the box. Could someone help me decode this debugging output? I was calling 8159911010. My server is 208.100.1.33. Theirs is 208.1.87.235. I

I need to setup a small mail server on a local network. It only needs SMTP ability as it's just so Asterisk can send out emails. The machine has sendmail installed. My primary mail server seems to be rejecting the messages. Some research says something isn't configured properly. What do I have to do so the outside world accepts emails from my Asterisk box? It is behind a NAT.

One of my providers has a different SIP account for each number. I have all of my users in one outbound context (caller ID passes fine). How do I ensure that the callers get routed down their correct SIP account with my provider for e911 purposes without each having their own context? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part

My provider has a Coppercom switch. I have included the authentication information they gave me. How would I structure this in Asterisk to the registration and the entry in sip.conf? User Name - 8159093010 Password - XXXXX No Pin Proxy - sip.essex1.com (10.1.3.2) Outbound Proxy - proxy.essex1.com (63.164.210.14) Change setting to use "outbound Proxy" ---------- Mike Hammett

I have two Asterisk servers. One is my primary server that I link to all of my providers and the other is at an office building with multiple tenants. If I tell Asterisk to dial an entry in the iax.conf that is for one customer off that second box, why does it use a different account for a different customer? It still ends up at the correct box, but it is hard to troubleshoot issues when

Hello According to this article, this nice little unit can only use the PSTN port for outgoing calls (ie. as a backup in case the connection to the VoIP provider stops working), but not incoming calls: http://tinyurl.com/mwjmo8 Can someone confirm that Atcom made this strange decision, and that there's no work-around? Thank you.

I thought I read somewhere that you no longer have to do a special make command for the 2.6 kernel. Is this true, or should I still make linux26? I'm having problems getting anything zaptel to load properly. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have multiple upstreams in my office. The primary upstream is having some issues with latency\jitter. I want to move the VoIP traffic to another interface. I have the router set to send all traffic destined for "local" networks out the respective interfaces. Traffic destined to the Internet goes out one of the upstreams. I can do this on a per-IP basis and have successfully done