similar to: Bell Canada Requests $987.14 Rate increase 9 11 /VOIP Providers

From the bend me over news department. 2 March 2006 Mr. Leonard Katz Executive Director Broadcasting and Telecommunications Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2 Dear Mr. Katz: Associated with Bell Canada Tariff Notice No. 6929 1. Attached for the Commission's approval are proposed revisions to Bell Canada's Access Services Tariff Item

In the latest CAVP conference call, the membership body voted to restrict membership to VoIP LEC's and to create a seperate membership body for any other parties interested in contributing to the CAVP's efforts in CRTC lobbying and providing a unified industry presence in the Canadian telco industry with a view to VoIP services. Accordingly, I would like to propose an adjutant association

Hi everyone. I'm currently running through FIPS validation, and this year CAVP requires KDF tests for SSH. I'm running OpenSSH v5.6p1 and I see that the 6 keys that I need are derived in kex_derived_keys in kex.c. However, I don't yet see any way for me to access this function from an existing command line tool, being able to pass in K, H, and the session_id from the test vector. Is

Public Comment is required in order to stop this from approval. Letter Ottawa, 10 March 2006 File No.: 8740-B2-200602153 By E-mail Mr. David Palmer Director - Regulatory Matters Bell Canada 110 O'Connor Street Floor 7 Ottawa, ON K1P 1H1 bell.regulatory@bell.ca Dear Mr. Palmer: Re: Bell Canada Tariff Notice 6929 On 2 March 2006, the Commission received Tariff Notice 6929 proposing

On-line signup form are available on our website at www.cavp.ca in the "Membership" section or please call 1-866-940-CAVP (2287) and select option 3 (CAVP treasurer). -------------- The CAVP is now accepting memberships applications. This is a pivotal moment for the CAVP and we need your support. Establishing a solid membership base will determine the organizations ability to function

Is it my imagination or has there been a huge increase in the number of fragmented threads in the last several days? Maybe it''s Gmail doing something crazy, but I see dozens of top-level conversations starting with replies (ex. "Re: [Rails] omfg something broke"). Did people collectively forget what the "reply" button looks like, or is the list software doing

[crossposted to isp-clec and asterisk-users] As part of several larger projects, the question of rate importation from termination carriers has come up. If a firm has four different LD partners, as an example, then it is obvious that the firm needs to determine at the origination of a call where that call would be best sent on a cost basis. I'll ignore things like quality of service and

Greetings folks, I'm currently dealing with a company to let me set Caller-ID-Name on outbound calls. So far pretty happy with their services. The basic service works like this: * CLEC sets Point Code to point to this company * CLEC has to sign LOA saying they give me permission to set the Caller-ID-Name through this company. * I go into web interface and set name. However, the CLEC is

Hello, Please join us Wednesday May 17th for an informal kickoff to openly discuss and formulate a plan to resurrect the Ottawa Asterisk User Group as well as discuss additional topics of interest that impact the VOIP marketplace and may also be included in our collective strategy. We'll also hear from the folks responsible for the Canadian Association of VOIP Providers (CAVP)

Using a SIP connection with a CLEC, the downstream (received) audio is perfect when the mute button is activated on the phone. However, when there is upstream audio (i.e., talking or even breathing into the microphone), the downstream audio is cut off. It's kinda like having a half-duplex audio connection. When I divert outgoing calls to another provider, these calls are fine.

I have the following configuration: CLEC -> T-1 -> Asterisk -> Adtran Channel Bank -> (analog) -> Nortel Don't complain that it's ugly. I've already done plenty of that. The CLEC manages their Adtran remotely and needs to be able to continue to do so. I assume they use FDL to do the management. We are using the Zaptel DACS/DACSRBS to cross connect some of the

Has anyone gotten CID from Bell Canada to work properly with *? We have our * box down at our datacentre in St Louis, and whenever we call it from a Bell Canada Telephone line, all we see is '' for the CID. I did some digging on google and the mailing lists and couldn't find anything pertaining directly to Bell-Canada and * CID, but didn't find much. I did however find :

Hi all, I am trying to setup a ZAP interface to do MF signaling for a handoff to a 911 tandem. The signaling I need to perform on the T1 is this: 9-1-1 Tandem: Wink CLEC end office: KP (Keypulse) NPA ST (Start) 9-1-1 Tandem: Wink CLEC end office: KP I (Info Digit) NXX XXXX ST As I'm not as familiar with the Zaptel configurabliity, I'm not really sure how to do this. Do I dial twice

Having just returned from four days at the VON show in Santa Clara, I thought I would submit a "highlights" message. I hope others who attended the show will take the opportunity to add, as there was far more to see than I can cover on my own. [VoIP IS BIG] First, I have to say that VoIP is BIG. It is the buzz technology of the day. The show was packed, and everybody there was there

Hi Folks, I'm trying to send CallerID Name information out to the PSTN via a PRI with Bell Canada with no success. With inbound calls (originating from the PSTN) CNAM is received successfully, and we've not had any similar problems with other Telco PRIs, so I'm stumped.

Hi Everyone, I've been in contact with a few members off list about this, and I still can't figure out what to do (aside from buying a more current ADSI compatibile screenphone). The problem is that I have a Locked Nortel Vista-350 phone and I cannot update the ADSI scripts. I have used the reset time/date trick, and then was able to partially upload the ADSI information to the

OK.. I'm up to my eyes in LD BS! I can't for the life of me understand how any carrier, either VoIP or traditional service provider can make heads or tails of how to hand off an * based call to an LD provider. Every provider I talk to, says I have to have a traditional T1 put in to their respective networks. I don't want to do this. I want a LD provider that can take a IP, SIP, IAX

My CLEC just called and asked if we will support the "MI2" protocol on our proposed T1 circuit. I think this is for CallerID name. Will the T100P support this? Thanks, Mike

Central business location has a PRI with a CLEC. Remote offices access the PRI for all voice traffic via VoIP. How does one get the telco to report the address of a remote office to the 911 call center when the call is made from that respective location?

Ahoy, I was able to follow the tutorials and build a simple to-do list program with Items and Categories and have the related tables link up w/ the default "scaffold :Items" command plus custom defenitions. Then I erased all of that and tried rebuilding the program using the ruby script/generate scaffold Item (and category) command. Now the templates look like " <% for