similar to: Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 34

Do you remember when Digium annouced channelized DS3???...vapour. You watch, this CODEC board will go the way of the DS3 boards...vapour. Mark my words. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Guys, I need your recommendation which card to buy?The TE411P or TE406P do they have any difference?I check their brochures they are differ only when it comes to PCI slot voltages.Which card best to use?Btw,Il be using supermicro board with 3.3V and 5.5V?Will il be experiencing problem during the implementation later on if i choose the wrong PCI voltage options?Will it depends on

I just wanted to see if any one else has seen this or could help point me in the right direction on this problem. I have a TE411P card in my * box. I am running FC4 x86_64. I used to have two TE110 cards in the same box that worked without any problems. Since changing to the TE411P cards, I am getting random DTMF tones being produced on a bridged connection through the same Channel Bank that I

Hi, I found E400P quad PRI card quite cheap (749USD): http://www.govarion.com/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=2&osCsid=68cdd6e3d08754 in comparison to te410p (approx 1500 USD ) http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TE410P Now newer generation with HW echo canceling emerged (te411p). I'm not sure in what things those two cards

Hi All This mail is from a new comer to asterisk , just exploring I was going through the digium web site , In need some advice and suggestions , which card I should chose , should I choose TE411P (with on board echo cancellation ) or TE410P If I go for TE411P , I will be spending 1,000 $ more and for me finance part is critical , will I face

To answer my own question of a week or so ago, as to whether RHAS3 users had got 3.0.11 to compile and execute (I had a plethora of errors): The Red Hat 3.0.11 SRPM from the Samba site compiled cleanly and runs fine (daemons and utilities) on my RHAS3 test rig, and on a RHAS3 update 4 production NAS server doubling as a Samba 3 server with 1150+ users of Unix/Linux and soon PDC Windows services.

hi! anyone please recommend/guide me of purchasing a resonably high performance server system regarding processor(s) & motherboard (+ other compulsary peripherals i.e. VGA, Soundcard). Mentioning up-to-date vendor+model will be more helping I've to use Digium TE411p Quad E1 card signalling on the E1 is SS7 no. of simultaneouse calls is 100+ regards -------------- next part

I checked the list of what not to use, but am still having no fun trying to find a working box. Can someone suggest a Compaq or Dell or MPC or . any other brand and model that is known to work well with the TE411P ? Will an old Proliant do? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I changed from a TE410P to a TE411P and fax carriers weren't detected anymore ! I have tried everything (recompile zaptel+asterisk+spandsp ; echocancel=yes/no ; rxgain=0/txgain=0 ; increase Wait() ; ...), nothing worked. The only solution that worked for me was to install and use NVFaxDetect. HTH.

I have seen conflicting references in regards to the Digium Wildcard TE411P echo settings in zapata.conf. Does anyone have the official word on this? Should echo cancel be enabled in zapata.conf if the card has built in EC? If so, should a particular EC method be compiled into the zaptel build? My reference, which has echo: My zaptel is 1.2.5 context=from-pstn switchtype=national

Hi all, I replaced a TE410P Rev C 1st Generation Firmware with a TE411P without any cfg changes (zaptel/zapata). As a result Asterisk crashes on outbound from PRI4 going to PRI1 calls: Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1

The Orion echo canceller is just ok. The Tellabs units work just as well if you don't mind 10 mins of soldering. I have the orion running with an adit 600 and a TE110P. Echo cancel is fairly good, but I have loads of problems with DTMF digits. -Darren ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com

I just implemented a system using a TE411P hardware echo cancellation card. Per Digium, I setup zaptel.conf, and zapata.conf the same way as I always have. To my surprise calls out to the PSTN had a terrible echo. 1 - 2 second delay, and quite clear. The echo was so bad that I had to remove the hardware echo cancellation module from the card. We are only using the 1st span of this card right

Hi all, 1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct? 2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is working (apart from being on a call)? 3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or

[Cross-posted to the asterisk forums, so if it seems familiar...] My company is looking to implement 100% recording of inbound and outbound calls. We're pondering using Asterisk as a trunk-side monitoring system sitting between our Avaya Definity switch and our mixed bag of 6 T1 and PRI circuits. I've read with interest Matt Roth's thread on the Asterisk mailing list, however, since

Every once in a while calls get interrupted with a brief silence followed by a DTMF tone on our T1 lines. We are using a TE411P card. It does not happen on SIP connections, just the T1. Has anyone experienced this or know a possible cause? Thanks, -Bill

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/11/02/rhel_deprecates_kde/ > > That's still several years in the future, of course. > > I use Mate on all of my machines rather than Gnome or KDE and I'm sure > many of you fine folks do the same. > > But it's interesting nonetheless. >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone have a 1650 running successfully in production mode with 2-4 PRI's? I want to make sure I don't have a motherboard compatibility problem before I buy one of these. We are going to be using a Digium TE210P to start off with and probably moving to the TE411P down the road aways? thanks, Sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version:

I have a suggestion about the heartbeat and the way that "downed node" detection works. There are occasions where a node is up, and for whatever reason, I need to power cycle it (for instance, a frozen process, etc). In these instances, my other nodes are unable to perform file system operations until the heartbeat period expires. This ends up being somewhere around 30-60 seconds (this

Hello, Avaya has a nice feature that allows you to a) ring both a cellphone and a desktop phone at the same time b) transfer calls (and access other PBX features) from the cellphone that recieved the call, as long as the call is bridged through the PBX c) while talking on the cellphone, pick up the handset on your desktop phone and the call is automatically moved there, hanging up the cellphone