Eric Bishop
2005-Sep-08 14:47 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] TE411P zapata.conf, monitoring echo cancellation and echo tail size
Hi all, 1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct? 2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is working (apart from being on a call)? 3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or 64ms on 32 channels this card will perform in the most difficult of environments.". How do I switch the echo tail size between 16ms and 64ms? Thanks..... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/fced0c98/attachment.htm
Matt Florell
2005-Sep-08 17:13 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] TE411P zapata.conf, monitoring echo cancellation and echo tail size
I was told you can leave echocancel=yes with no problems, the drivers will see it and take over if the echocancel card is present. I have found no method of monitoring echo cancellation(other than listening for echo on live calls) without altering asterisk or zaptel code. But there are no tools for it built in to asterisk or zaptel. Currently the echo tails are hardcoded and are not configurable. I think it's set at 16ms for all channels on the card. Talking with support at Digium and they said it may be an option to set it differently in a future driver version. MATT--- On 9/8/05, Eric Bishop <asterisk.eric@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi all, > > 1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing > TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and > echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct? > > 2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is > working (apart from being on a call)? > > 3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or 64ms on > 32 channels this card will perform in the most difficult of environments.". > How do I switch the echo tail size between 16ms and 64ms? > > > Thanks..... > > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com <http://Easynews.com>-- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/fe45eb53/attachment.htm
Cory Andrews
2005-Sep-08 19:22 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] TE411P zapata.conf, monitoring echo cancellation and echo tail size
I don't think you can switch the echo tail size, I could be mistaken, but I think the more channels you are utilizing the smaller amount of MS you have allocated to each channel. Cory Andrews Partner / Purchasing VOIPSupply.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ v - 800.398.VOIP Ext 22 f - 716.630.1548 e - Cory@VOIPSupply.com -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Eric Bishop Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:47 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE411P zapata.conf,monitoring echo cancellation and echo tail size Hi all, 1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct? 2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is working (apart from being on a call)? 3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or 64ms on 32 channels this card will perform in the most difficult of environments.". How do I switch the echo tail size between 16ms and 64ms? Thanks..... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/324aeed0/attachment.htm