similar to: protocol application invalid cisco 7940g

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "protocol application invalid cisco 7940g"

2004 Dec 11
2
Cisco 7960 says "Protocol Application Invalid?"
I have been able to upgrade my Cisco 7905G phones to the SIP Image without any problems, but I just got a 7960, and I can't seem to get to the settings so I can upgrade to a SIP Image. When the phone boots up, it says Configuring VLAN, Configuring IP, TFTP ????..., then Protocol Application Invalid. I noticed on the wiki page "Firmware issues on 7940 - 7960"
2005 Aug 14
2
Cisco and "protocol application invalid"
Hey all! Have configured a Cisco 7960 with no problems, put up an TFTP server and it downloaded new sip binaries ? all went well. However, now I am having trouble getting two 7040s to work. Basically, my problem is the above stated error message. If I had any entries in the TFTP logfile, I could probably solve this problem. But the thing is, it just doesn?t look as if the phones are
2004 Apr 07
1
Re: specified network name no more available
I was stung by this bug yesterday myself and although there are numerous references to this error message I haven't seen any qualified resolution of the problem. Not that the following rant hopes to be such, but it's a good story. My setup is a stable 2.2.8a production domain and an experimental 3.0.2a-SuSE domain. The passwd backend is still smbpasswd. I wish there were a better
2005 Mar 09
1
Cisco 7960 Protocol Invalid when Upgrading to 7.3
Cisco 7960 Upgrading from 6.x to 7.3 get Protocol Invalid. I'm sure this has been discussed but has anyone figured this out. Regards, Juan Staalenburg Teksavers, Inc. (512) 255-8395 x1002 AIM: juanteksavers
2008 Jan 08
3
Is it possible to use spandsp and patton to do fax2mail ?
Hi, I succesfully install spandsp chan_misdn and digium card. the rxfax works fine and I get the fax result by email. I would like to do the same using a Patton gw + zaptel but I can't receive fax anymore, the call comes in from ISDN in the Patton gw, patton sends it to asterisk, asterisk run a macro to make a tif file using rxfax, the tif file is correctly created but with a 0 size the call
2006 Jan 20
0
Cisco 7912G SIP phone and Asterisk double RTP packets
Hi there, i did some tests with two Cisco 7912G phones (SIP stack) yesterday. With both ethereal and tcpdump listening on the Asterisk-Server's NIC, it came up that all RTP packets were doubled, with some small but almost constant delay (~460 us). The setup is 7912G <--> ASTERISK <--> 7912G The tcpdump output shows RTP traffic ASTERISK --> 7912G: 000000 IP $ASTERISK.17944
2006 Jun 05
0
change of calls control with VRRP protocol
Hi! I' ve this problem: I've 2 asterisks box, asterisk11 and asterisk12, and one wi_fi phone. I call from wi_fi to a X-lite phone on a windows xp.I've setuped the X-lite to my vrrp IP (vrid IP) and the call is ok, I call from the wi_fi to X-lite and from the X-lite to wi_fi. In asterisk panell is all ok, and I listen the voice to the xp and in the wi_fi phone. asterisk12 is my master.
2006 Jan 20
1
cisco 7940g, 7960g phone screen sizes?
Anyone have screen size + resolution for the cisco 7940g, 7960g? I'm having a hard time finding it anywhere. No vendors have the information and cisco doesn't list it. All I've been able to find is the rez of the 7940g : 100x145. -Dan
2004 Nov 26
2
IAXy and DHCP
Hi, I've got an IAXy, and provided it with connection data - unfortunately didn't provide a fixed ip address, but left with dhcp. Everthing went fine, and I could work a while with it. After a restart of IAXy, it didn't negotiate a new IP address, nor used the old one. I even restarted the DHCP server and cleared its cache. No success. I went to another office with a different
2005 Jan 18
3
Cisco 7940G
Hi, We've got a customer site with Cisco 7940G Phones connecting to our Asterisk Server via SIP. However, upon running a "sip show peers" it states that the phone is : user/user (Unspecified) D 255.255.255.255 0 Unmonitored All phones can call out via our Asterisk Server fine regardless. The problem is when they try and place a call to one another, where it
2004 Apr 11
1
Cisco 7940G/7960G SIP phones local echo on * box.
Our new * server with Cisco SIP phones is now working pretty well. But we still have one problem that has not been resolved. The Cisco SIP phones have a consistent echo. It sounds like about a 500ms delay. This echo is not heard from the POTS side. It is heard when calling another SIP extension in our office. We are running 6.3 firmware on the phones. Any suggestions would be
2009 Jun 24
3
Removing line 2 from CISCO 7940g
Folks, I have CISCO 7940g phone. I have in the past configured the phone with two lines. Having found the 2nd line wasn't much use, I want to remove it from the config. I have taken it out of the SIP config file that is TFTPd to the phone but it is still showing on the phone and it is still trying to log into Asterisk with that account. I have tried removing the config line and blanking
2004 Apr 10
4
Time/Date missing on Cisco 7940G and 7960G SIP phone display
When we were first installing these SIP phones, the time and date was displayed on the top status line. Firmware version 6.3. Using dhcp, tftp, http, and ntp servers for configuration all on the LAN (* box). Now that we have these working with *, the time/date display is missing. Any ideas? Thanks, Tom
2009 Feb 13
2
Cisco IP Phone 7940G.
Hello I recently get a Cisco 7940G IP Phone and I try to make several things with it and I en counted many difficulties: 1.) I tried to unlock the phone and to set manually IP Address, Netmask, Gateway etc. I don't get any luck. 2.) I tried to upgrade firmware like they said with tftp server... I downloaded: P0S3-08-11-00.zip and I uncompressed the files in tftpboot directory. I don't get
2005 May 22
4
Cisco 7940g Firmware load problems
I have a Cisco 7940G IP Phone. I am trying to load the firmware to SIP 3.2. The Phone just hangs in Defaulting CM to TFTP Server. It doesn't do anything else after that. I also have two other 7940g's that are the Universal Application Loader mode and say Protocol Application Invalid. I need to know what I can do to fix both these problems. I am running Asterisk@Home version 1.0. I have to
2018 Sep 27
1
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > >> Do we do better if we use signed arithmetic for the whole calculation? > > >> Then a small backwards movement would
2018 Sep 18
2
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at
2018 Sep 18
2
[patch 09/11] x86/vdso: Simplify the invalid vclock case
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:52 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018, John Stultz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto at
2004 Jan 11
1
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] More Success on the Cisco 7920 and SCCP !!!!!
Hi Siggi, > > 7960 and then "Call Ended" on the Display (curious about that !!!). > > That seems to be normal for the 7920. I've sniffed the registration > procedure with Cisco's newest 3.3(3) CallManager (+patches), and it's > doing the same thing. Maybe that's some odd way of testing if the > CallManager ("CCM") really works... >
2007 May 03
2
Can vista client can negotiage smb2 protocol with the samba server?
Hi, I have a specific question about the SMB 2 (or CIFS 2 version protocol). SMB2 was introduced with Microsoft Vista and is a redesign of the older SMB protocol. (http://wiki.ethereal.com/SMB2) Is current samba 3.0.xx release (or samba 4 release) support this protocol when vista client tries to establish session with the samba server. What are the features or advantages of getting this