similar to: IRQ Problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "IRQ Problems"

2006 Apr 04
2
Fax over 2 bridged TE110P channels
Hi, I have an asterisk installation with 2 E1 cards Software version is Asterisk 1.2.6 Libpri 1.2.2 Zaptel 1.2.5 I'm having problem with fax transmission, let me explain better my setup: My fist TE110P E1 card is connected to the telco line the second TE110P E1 one to an Nexspan PBX so the server is basically sitting between the line, and the pbx. every call coming from the line is
2005 Mar 22
6
IRQ headaches
Excuse my ignorance here, but I am desperately trying to isolate the IRQ for my TE110P card (shown below as t1xxp) Ive gone into my bios and disabled all usb , parallel, serial and some other devices, those that I needed to keep, I have moved off of IRQ 10 and onto IRQ 5, but everytime I boot up, I get usb-uhci and ehci_hcd using IRQ 10 as well as my Digium card. Does anybody know what these are
2006 Dec 28
1
TE110P with Qsig
Hi all, as good? I am trying to go up a board TE110P with link E1 ISDN PRI to establish connection with a central office Siemens HiPath 4000. But I am having the following errors: Server1:~ # asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.10, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer <markster@digium.com> Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty'
2007 Jan 25
2
TE110P and HDLC problems
Hi!, this issue makes me crazy. I read a lot of docs, also * mailling list and I try a lot of things without success. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the info: Hardware: -------------------------------------------- Supermicro Server with motherboard X7DB8, chipset Intel 5000P, Xeon 5050 Digium TE110P Software --------------------------------------------- Asterisk version 1.2.12.1
2005 Jun 29
4
PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1
I receive this error on the asterisk console and it is pretty much ALWAYS coming up. Sometimes there will be a break where it does not display. We had our PRI provider test the lines and they claim that there is no signalling problem. It doesn't matter if there are no calls or if there are 10 calls in progress the error is still displayed. I also get an annoying popping or clicking sound
2005 May 27
2
chan_zap.c:8534 pri_dchannel: PRI Error
hello all, i'm using TE110P and all configuration prosess is done. but after i do the 'modprobe' for zaptel and wcte11xp, follow by ztcfg -vv and asterisk -vvvgc i have this error. *CLI> May 27 14:44:33 WARNING[3059]: chan_zap.c:8534 pri_dchannel: PRI Error: We think we're the network, but they think they're the network, too. May 27 14:44:34 WARNING[3059]: chan_zap.c:8534
2005 May 02
4
DELL 2800 : PCI Parity error
Hi, I am struggling to get rid of a conflict on DELL 2800 : PCI Parity error (EB113 on the display) I am learning linux and asterisk as I go along, there might be obvious things I should know, but bear with me. >From demsg below my 2 digium cards installed are listed (no config or connections done to digium cards yet), the conflict is with the TDM400P card, without that card, in any slot, no
2007 Jul 26
10
Query
Hi, I am facing problem in configuring D-channel. I did the following configuration for TE-120P card /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf group=1 signalling=pri_cpe switchtype=euroisdn context=incoming channel=1-15,17-31 DIGIUM card is connected through cable to another end.On placing call from other end to
2006 Nov 22
5
TE110P and TDM400P
Hello all. I have here a TE110P (configured as E1) and a TDM400P (with four X100P - FXS). Both boards are recognized by the operating system as showed above: 0000:08:00.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX Modem/ISDN interface Subsystem: Unknown device b1d9:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 169 I/O ports at e800 [size=256]
2005 Jun 23
1
HDLC abort 6 error
I've read as much as I can on this error and still can't seem to figure out what's causing this error: Jun 23 20:54:58 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]:
2005 Feb 17
2
Sangoma A104 - D-Channel problem
Hello, I have following problem with Sangoma A104 card: CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7 Sentrej: 0 SolicitFbit: 0 Retrans: 0 Busy: 0 Overlap Dial: 0 T200 Timer: 1000 T203 Timer: 10000 T305 Timer: 30000 T308 Timer: 4000 T313 Timer: 4000 N200 Counter: 3 NOTICE[16509]: chan_zap.c:7494 pri_dchannel: PRI
2007 Feb 07
9
Digium TE110P
Helo, I have problem with Digium TE110P connected to CISCO 3640 (port on NM-HDV-2E1-60) wth PRI E1 link. I use CISCO now for testing but when I tried with real PBX problem was exactly same. I have this messages in Asterisk conole and log sometimes: NOTICE[1115] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Usually 2-5 such messages in series, can be repeated after 10
2005 Aug 31
2
PRI Identity Crisis
Just upgraded to most recent CVS and now I get this: pri_dchannel: PRI Error: We think we're the CPE, but they think they're the CPE too. when starting asterisk. Needless to say, I can't run asterisk without my PRI. Guess I'll start reverting code backwards day by day until I find the code that works. -Matthew
2006 May 12
1
TE110P on E1
Hi, I wonder if anyone is using Digium's TE110P card on an E1 connection. I have been try to, but so far it wasn't much of a success. It only works more or less in EuroISDN as PRI CPE. And even that config gives me some trouble with channel negotiation. My current config: *zaptel.conf:* span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=be defaultzone=be *zapata.conf:* [trunkgroups]
2007 Mar 07
1
Re: Back to back E1 - asterisk <=> toshiba pbx - Call droping
Hi steve and All, I'm attaching cat proc/interrupts out put, lspci -bv out put, zapa.conf, zaptel.conf for your information Thanks so much for the feedback and I do accordingly. Hope to get rid off this isue any how. To day also reported 10 call drops within 2 hours of period. fook forward to have your support on this regard. Thanks & Regards, Vidura Senadeera, Network Engineer,
2005 Apr 22
4
TE11OP -> Mitel 200Sx??
Hello all. I just received a TE110P and am trying to hook it to my Mitel 200SX has anyone successfully done this? My configuration is as follows. Asterisk -> TE110P ->Kentrox (csu/dsu) -> Mitel T1 Card. All I get is a blinking yellow on my TE110P card and an alarm on my Mitel. T1 card. Any advice would be great. Zaptel.conf span=1,0,1,d4,ami e&m=1-23 dchan=24
2006 Apr 10
7
te110p and interrupts
Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples
2003 Oct 15
2
Problem with T100P card in a new chassis
Due to some failed hardware on another platform, I've had to move a T100P card to a different chassis. After this move was completed, I am seeing some strange results on the T100P card that do not display to me any failure mode with which I am familiar. The card comes up, and shows "good" carrier and status, but Asterisk refuses to bring the D-channel up. Calls of course do
2005 Sep 10
1
TE110P reset
My TE110P reset some times in the day. E this cause an interruption in the service. How I decide this problem? my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 # set this to 1-15,17-31 for E1 dchan=24 # set this to 16 for E1 defaultzone=us loadzone=us my zapata.conf [channels] language=en signalling=pri_cpe switchtype=national echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=200 ; Asterisk
2016 Apr 18
2
GM108GLM?
Is there anything I can do in this regard? /smo On 2016-03-31 23:12, Pierre Moreau wrote: > Oh, hum, GM108 is NV118 and not NV108 which is Gk208… My bad! > > SMF from the bug report seemed to have some working setup, and since he didn't > pinged back, I guess it's working nicely. But some more checking might still be > needed? > > On 04:59 PM - Mar 31 2016, Ilia