similar to: which cvs versions are being used in production systems?

Greetings all. I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed all the Centos repos < 5.6 being listed. Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now? Here's the output of the aforementioned yum command - sorry it's a little bit long: [root at karsites ~]# yum --enablerepo '*' --disablerepo

I've been a RH/Fedora guy since the RH8 days. When Fedora came along, I moved to it, but its been a bit painful beta testing software all the time. I ran Ubuntu for a while, but I found their package management to be difficult... I do a lot of technical work, development and loading and building special stuff. I much prefer RPMs over other methods of package distribution. Presently

Hi, I just (~1100h CET) pulled the current wine release from CVS (as I do almost every morning ;-), compiled and now my Lotus Notes client does not complete its startup anymore (yes, I know CVS is bleeding edge...) I get lots of fixme:file:LockFile not implemented in server fixme:file:UnlockFile not implemented in server messages, the window is being created, the menu bar is being drawn and

Does anyone have any experience with iax.cc/sixtel? Are they a legitimate company? From their website it looks like you can get a private incoming 800 number for 30 cents/month plus 2 cents/minute. Somehow that pricing seems a little cheap for a DID number. I assume there has to be some minimum usage or something. Any info as far as actual costs and/or voice quality would be appreciated.

Dear LLVMers, If you live on the bleeding edge (i.e. CVS version), please read! On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Do you really want external patches for this ? A simple Perl script > that runs on all *.h and *.cpp files, and a local commit from your > side would be much simpler. I'm in the process of doing just this as we speak. What this

Why not put all this into a pre-commit filter in CVS and be done with it? We'd never be bothered with it again as it would never be committed again. Reid. On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 15:11 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > If you live on the bleeding edge (i.e. CVS version), please read! > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:

I'm finally migrating from the 6/7/05 CVS version to 1.4. Had quite a run, I have to admit. Asterisk itself only segfaulted once or twice, but the dns issues have been bothering me. And the box just needs to go. Everything is going on a Ubuntu 6.06TLS server, that's been perfectly stable. I had 1.4.1 installed and running, but not configured. Yesterday I upgraded to 1.4.11,

On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16 >> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the >> PHP >> people one month ago [1]. >> >> Now, our developers want to use the new

Hello, I would like to consulate with you guys. I'm setting up an Asterisk server on Debian. The problem is that Rhino drivers are only compatible with Zaptel 1.2. By default debian stable offers asterisk 1.2 and zaptel 1.2, and that suits our needs. Is there a bleeding need to use latest version of asterisk? I have managed to install Asterisk 1.4 and Zaptel 1.2 but then i got the

Neil Nelson wrote: > When I was managing IT and the servers for a small company that > needed to be live 24/7 we used the latest Ubuntu LTS version > because we needed rock-solid performance as best we could get. > The software in the LTS version is tested and used by a large > user base with necessary updates and so we expected to have high > reliability. I used to work for

> On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:07 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 18:06 -0500, H wrote: >> On 11/16/2020 01:23 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: >>>> I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the >>>> motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS

On 08/23/2015 07:25 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 08:05 -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: > >> Thunderbird has a MITM vulnerability with its otherwise rather groovy >> auto-configuration feature. > >> https://librelamp.com/FooBird#security >> >> has what I think would be the easiest solution while keeping the >> ability to

Hi all, Before you read any further, I have been through the posts available on the Internet about missing text in application/winecfg, so I've made sure msfonts are installed, there are fonts in the drive_c/windows/Fonts directory & the .reg file is pointing to one which is in there. Everything was working fine until I updated my graphics so the pretty Ubuntu effects would work

> the default should not be to tell people to run CVS code, > that should only be for people interested in hacking on > the code and trying out bleeding-edge features. I second this motion. While I am not a developer I do notice that most projects tend to take this approach. The CVS is generally for those who want to experiment with the 'bleeding edge', and regular releases of

Juan, You need to be aware how RHEL distributes software. Please read https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue to be supported by Red Hat with security patches. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Juan Bernhard" <juan at

I've been having some issues with srtp. so I checked which version of libsrtp I built asterisk 11.6 against. I'm on fedora 21, so libsrtp-1.4.4-13.20101004cvs.fc21.x86_64. From https://github.com/cisco/libsrtp it seems that latest release is 1.5.1, released a couple of weeks ago. I'm not a fan of the bleeding edge, but using a version 4+ years old seems strange even to me. But,

Thanks for your response, Rowland. As far as newer versions of Debian/Samba, I actually started with Ubuntu 18.04, which had Samba 4.7. But I ran into another problem trying to use it, so I backed off to an older version that I was hoping was more stable. See: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13298 Meanwhile, I did find out more about what was causing this error by looking at the

I have been following the patches on nvme support on the list and was wondering: If I wanted to build a vm host to be on the bleeding edge for nvme and spdk fun in libvirt, which linux distro -- fedora/ubuntu/centos/etc -- should I pick?

Hello shorewall-users, now that I''ve got v1.4 problems solved I''d just like to ask a general question. Are there any real benefits to upgrading if v1.4 does what I want ? I''m not a fan of bleeding-edge in production and I don''t go for "v2 must be better than v1 because it''s newer" Tom, if you have a few minutes, what''s new in 2.0

On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: >> Kai, >> >> It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's >> not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. >> Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and >> long term support is absolutely crucial,